Quick question /p/, can you help me identify this camera? [EXIF

File: image.jpg (110KB, 640x732px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 640x732px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	732

File: image.jpg (133KB, 640x721px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 640x721px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	721

File: image.jpg (113KB, 640x740px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 640x740px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	740

that is an olympus omd em5
it has a quarter sized sensor compared to typical cameras and thus suffers from many technical problems
use the gear thread, kill yourself, and/or never come back

>>2680216
>2000+15
>not recognising OMD master race

it's like you're a LEICA® shooter or something

>>2680210
>removed the eyecup
what a cuck

>>2680210
>using phone to take a picture of a picture inside a camera
hahahahahahahaha.
we need to go derper.

>>2680219
Anon but,
I have an olympus

Who is this semen demon, family?

>>2680210
He shoots with an A7 now.

And all these fuckers here not following ohrangutang...

>>2680216
I hear this song every time I look at that camera. I think lolympus missed out by not cross branding.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpoIWmLVpTE

>>2680216
>suffers from many technical problems
Care to elaborate?

>>2680210
>2015
>Still thinks that photo results like what are shown on the LCD are related in any way to the camera, rather than the abilities of the photographer.

Take any camera you can find, up to and including your fucking cell phone. Point it at a beautiful model who knows how to pose, in excellent light, and your results will be exactly the same. The dude could be holding a digital hasselblad, or a Rebel Xt, and the results would be nearly identical, for all intents and purposes.

>>2680210
you have the guy's instagram page, why not just ask him?

also

>buying a camera based on looks rather than performance aspects


LEL

>>2681135
No don't you understand??? If I had that camera, my photos of bushes and my shoes lit by a 60 watt lamp across the room will look like that! They'll be sexy, and beautiful! The camera will make my photos good! Look how good those photos on the back of the screen look!

>>2681127

He's a shitposter, don't engage.

>>2681118
>I think lolympus missed out by not cross branding.
considering enola gay was the name of the plane that dropped both the hiroshima and nagasaki bombs, i'm pretty sure that any lolympus marketing employee that suggested it would've been fired and forced to seppuke on live tv

>>2681231
OMD did have other "hits"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyl9enDp8Ls