[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 68. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: paris_128.jpg (457KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]
paris_128.jpg
457KB, 1920x1280px
I took this photo in some funky clothes shop in Paris and I thought it was really cool but I want to make the Japanese writing stand out a bit more from the background.

Can anyone make the background more unfocused and the white Japanese text more focused and more vibrant (sorry if I used the wrong word, I'm pretty new)
8 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>>/wsr/
>>
>>3114889
>requesting
>not resizing
literally tells you on the front page not to do this
>>
>>3114889
>white Japanese text
get your monitor calibrated, that's nowhere near white

File: yup.jpg (70KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]
yup.jpg
70KB, 500x375px
Thoughts you faggots?
10 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>implying anyone on /p/ has any taste
4 real, most on here have as shit taste as skill.
Also, most people will never read the point where they think it's perfect, just the one where it's good enough for others to be impressed, but it's still your people skills that will give you commercial success, for whomever is sorry enough to want that
>>
>>3114764
Delusion is the artist's greatest weapon
>>
Written by a jew that hasn't ever worked a day in his life.

Really makes you think

How is a photo similar to this one achieved. By that I mean the lighting being so smooth and uniform, especially in a house. No blown out highlights. Is it a composite, made by merging together different exposures focusing on the foreground, then hallway, etc? Guessing it shot around 18mm? Would a tilt-shift come into play in order to get nicer verticals? Are those used in interior photography?

Full set here:
http://www.seanfennessy.com.au/folk-residence/
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Off camera lighting is definitely used.
>>
>>3114732
This. Basically whole lots of soft lighting to just brighten the whole place up. You can see near the bottom of the columns where it gets darker because of the lack of lighting
>>
They either used off camera lighting

Or took advantage of some large windows, and placed parchman or some paper over them to diffuse the light a bit

File: D3S_6098-1200.jpg (227KB, 1200x925px) Image search: [Google]
D3S_6098-1200.jpg
227KB, 1200x925px
Are pentax K1000's worth the 80 Canuck bucks? Thinking of getting one as my first film camera. The light sensor is in "great condition" if that makes a difference.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
9 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
alot of them have that mold like damage in the viewfinder
>>
They're worth about 350
>>
>>3114574
How hard would it be to get rid of them and how noticeable are they?

File: 41NrAdYkQ-L._SX355_.jpg (16KB, 355x272px) Image search: [Google]
41NrAdYkQ-L._SX355_.jpg
16KB, 355x272px
>saw this at thrift store and bought it out of impulse
what the hell is it and was it worth $7, seems to have everything working
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
It's a $7 hunk of plastic that's had its film discontinued over a decade ago.
>>
>>3114501
Nice blog
>>
>>3114501
it's cool dude, instant photo printout, you can still get film for it, german hipster company sill on that shit

File: IMG_20170714_200116.jpg (2MB, 3200x2400px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170714_200116.jpg
2MB, 3200x2400px
>tfw doing lens repair

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera ModelZTE B2017G
Camera SoftwareP852A12-user 6.0.1 MMB29M eng.zte.20160909.214507 release-keys
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)4 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:07:14 20:01:16
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/1.9
Exposure ProgramNot Defined
ISO Speed Rating384
Lens Aperturef/1.9
Brightness0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length3.70 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3200
Image Height2400
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
19 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3114426
I just stick the broken lens in a microwave for 5 days and it welds itself back together.
>>
use superglue desu
>>
>>3114439
This, and post results.

File: Fuji-X-T1-Top-View.jpg (33KB, 520x226px) Image search: [Google]
Fuji-X-T1-Top-View.jpg
33KB, 520x226px
Does anyone feel like people overrate Fuji's classic SLR control layout?
>constantly use command dial anyways to tweak things because using on full stops is retarded
>auto ISO 1600/3200/6400, manually adjusting with FN button for the rare occasion is no big deal

It was cool at first, but I realized it was nowhere near the make-or-break that prevented people from using other systems

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareGoogle
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width520
Image Height226
59 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
>>3114103

A labeled shutterspeed dial is kinda nice, but not make or break, really. I tend to shoot aperture mode more often.

The higher level Sony bodies are just as good when it comes to controls.
>>
You'll feel like they're overrated until you use one, and then you'll wonder how you ever made do without.
>>
>>3114198

Also this is doubly true for the x100 series with the beautifully built aperture ring.

File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
NO_FILE_GIVEN
0B, 0x0pxpx
Why do digital photos look so shit and lifeless compared to film? Why haven't digital cameras caught up to film yet? What's taking so long.
13 posts and 0 images submitted.
>>
>>3114102
Wow, that is really some very, very bland background. You know... a shot of black in their trim paint would have changed it just enough to be more interesting.
>>
>>3114102
Because film is objectively better, in all situations, than digital. Anyone who says otherwise is objectively stupid.
>>
>>3114102
are you really this dumb or is this another summer troll thread?

File: 3235.jpg (80KB, 1400x840px) Image search: [Google]
3235.jpg
80KB, 1400x840px
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/12/monkey-selfie-macaque-copyright-court-david-slater

> A US appeals court has debated whether or not a monkey can own the copyright to a selfie, while the photographer whose camera captured the famous image watched a livestream of the proceedings from his home in the UK.

> David Slater could not afford the air fare to San Francisco to attend the hearing on Wednesday. Nor can he afford to replace his broken camera equipment, or pay the attorney who has been defending him since the crested black macaque sued him in 2015, and is exploring other ways to earn an income.
21 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: 2000.jpg (119KB, 1240x1550px) Image search: [Google]
2000.jpg
119KB, 1240x1550px
>The story of the monkey selfie began in 2011, when Slater traveled to Sulawesi, Indonesia, and spent several days following and photographing a troop of macaques. Slater has long maintained that the selfies were the result of his ingenuity in coaxing the monkeys into pressing the shutter while looking into the lens, after he struggled to get them to keep their eyes open for a wide-angle close-up.

>“It wasn’t serendipitous monkey behavior,” he said. “It required a lot of knowledge on my behalf, a lot of perseverance, sweat and anguish, and all that stuff.”

>The photographs became popular, and Slater said that he earned a few thousand pounds – enough to cover the cost of the trip to Indonesia. But the images became the subject of a complicated legal dispute in 2014, when Slater asked the blog Techdirt and Wikipedia to stop using them without permission.

>The websites refused, with Wikipedia claiming that the photograph was uncopyrightable because the monkey was the actual creator of the image. The US Copyright Office subsequently ruled that animals cannot own copyrights.

>“Every photographer dreams of a photograph like this,” Slater said of the image of a primate grinning toothily into the lens. “If everybody gave me a pound for every time they used [the photograph], I’d probably have £40m in my pocket. The proceeds from these photographs should have me comfortable now, and I’m not.”
>>
>>3113871
o_0
>>
>In 2015, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta) filed a suit against Slater on behalf of the macaque, which it identified as a six-year-old male named Naruto, claiming that the animal was the rightful owner of the copyright. A judge ruled against Peta in 2016, saying that animals were not covered by the Copyright Act. Peta appealed to the ninth circuit court of appeals, which heard oral arguments on Wednesday.

>Among the points of contention were whether Peta has a close enough relationship to Naruto to represent it in court, the value of providing written notice of a copyright claim to a community of macaques, and whether Naruto is actually harmed by not being recognized as a copyright-holder.

>“There is no way to acquire or hold money. There is no loss as to reputation. There is not even any allegation that the copyright could have somehow benefited Naruto,” said Judge N Randy Smith. “What financial benefits apply to him? There’s nothing.”

>At one point, Judge Carlos Bea considered the question of how copyright passes to an author’s heirs.

>“In the world of Naruto, is there legitimacy and illegitimacy?” Bea asked. “Are Naruto’s offspring ‘children’, as defined by the statute?”

>For Slater, it was a painfully ironic line of questioning in light of his concerns for his own seven-year-old daughter and his continuing belief that the copyright is his. “I can’t afford to own a car. There’s no camera equipment for her to inherit if I die tomorrow,” he said. “She should inherit this [copyright], but it’s worthless.”

>The lawyer for Slater’s publisher, which is also a defendant, also raised the question of whether Peta has even identified the right monkey – something that Slater disputes.

File: Cy2JjSFVEAAktVD.jpg (189KB, 799x1200px) Image search: [Google]
Cy2JjSFVEAAktVD.jpg
189KB, 799x1200px
I've been trying to figure out Alex strohls editing style for a while now but can't seem to get it down right.

Any ideas? How does he get the skies so like and pastel yet his foregrounds sharp bright?
33 posts and 7 images submitted.
>>
>>3113768
Light*
>>
A medium format camera, with a fast, sharp lens
>>
>>3113770

He shoots full frame digital though.

File: 1499860820956.jpg (382KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]
1499860820956.jpg
382KB, 1840x1232px
How to get this "granular" or analogic effect? According to Flickr, the guy who made pic related used a Fujifilm SLP1000SE and Adobe Lightroom.
15 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
File: 35396644481_e3af269947_o.jpg (2MB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]
35396644481_e3af269947_o.jpg
2MB, 1840x1232px
Another pic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSLP1000SE
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:06:26 01:20:12
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: 28440134881_19baed2474_o.jpg (1MB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]
28440134881_19baed2474_o.jpg
1MB, 1840x1232px
Last one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSLP1000SE
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:07:25 01:54:00
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
>>3113735
Fujifilm SLP1000SE is a Fuji minilab scanner

so these were shot on film. It's not an effect, it's just what film looks like

so shoot film or use VSCO if you can't hack shooting film for real

File: fp620m.jpg (17KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]
fp620m.jpg
17KB, 450x450px
I am being asked to help some folks out with photography: head shots and the like.

What does /p/ recommend on a tight budget, two sets of two options:

Studio flash units or shoe-mount flash units
--and--
Should I set up to go to them, or have them come to me?
8 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Speedlites will work fine.
>>
https://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Speedlite-Monolight-Location-Photography/dp/B0043GT9Y0/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1499893137&sr=8-4&keywords=photography+strobe

I bought this guy and it hasn't failed me since.
>>
>>3112828
I'm at least keeping an eye on guide numbers. I can get either for about the same price (going cheap).

So one for speedlights.

>>3112832
And one for studio flash.
Is that unit higher output than a speedlight?
Does it impede mobility?

And do either of you prefer to bring your clients to you, or to go to your clients?

File: IMG_20170711_164901.png (209KB, 720x422px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170711_164901.png
209KB, 720x422px
Which one is better?
36 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
A6000
>>
>>3112285
Canon, for the pure virtue of the better supported system.
>>
>>3112290
What do you mean by that?

Tfw when painters are better at landscape photography than photographers are..
10 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: neatroll.gif (150KB, 500x419px) Image search: [Google]
neatroll.gif
150KB, 500x419px
>>
>>3110264
>Tfw painters can manipulate all aspects of a scene to emphasize subject and compositional elements

Apples and tangerines faggot
>>
>>3110264
But look at how soft the focus is

File: Capture.png (1MB, 934x697px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
1MB, 934x697px
>M43? You might as well use a cellphone camera!
Where does sentiment come from, and does it actually hold any weight?
180 posts and 18 images submitted.
>>
>>3110256
Depends on the image sensors dummy
>>
no m43 crushes any and all cellphone cameras
even the cm1 only has a 1" sensor
>>
>>3110256
No

m43 is the best format, nice compact size, great lenses

and better IQ, and dof than a FF camera with slightly worse, but usually on par low light performance

it can even throw blows at MF cameras

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.