File: IMG_0625.jpg (101KB, 576x1024px) Image search:
[Google]
101KB, 576x1024px
How come award winning pictures taken by professional photographers are always taken on full frame cameras? Are they really that good?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 576 Image Height 1024 Scene Capture Type Standard
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
yes, award winning professional photographers are that good
>>
>>3114282
yes, everyone who has ever owned a FF camera has won a photography award
>>
Stop with these terrible bait threads
File: 140924_ef50mm_01.jpg (39KB, 550x412px) Image search:
[Google]
39KB, 550x412px
when
9 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
now
>>
>>3114194
How soon is now?
>>
>>3114210
When will then be now?
Catsby (ID: !RqPRxvq4p6)
Catsby's May blog: random edition 2017-06-16 02:28:17 Post No.3096400
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Catsby's May blog: random edition 2017-06-16 02:28:17 Post No.3096400
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Catsby's May blog: random edition
Catsby (ID: !RqPRxvq4p6)
2017-06-16 02:28:17
Post No. 3096400
[Report]
[View this topic]
Some snaps.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
108 Posts / 76 Images
View this topic
>>
File: photo-2.jpg (483KB, 996x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
483KB, 996x1000px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
File: photo-3.jpg (370KB, 1000x799px) Image search:
[Google]
370KB, 1000x799px
My new cat, Herr Mann, or Mr. Man if you want, he refuses to answer both.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
>>
File: photo-4.jpg (490KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
490KB, 1000x667px
Leftists can be neckbeards too
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi
File: s-l1600.jpg (247KB, 1600x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
247KB, 1600x1200px
Just baught pic related.
So, how much did i fuck up /p/?
Never been on this board before, from /g/ originally.
How do i know what films to get? Is there a comparison website?
23 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3116045
You did great, no fuck ups. Just read the manual, and take it easy when shooting, learn the basics.
As for film, start with the cheap shit first, so you get the technique down.
How much did you pay for that F-1? In that condition?
>>
>>3116047
360 USD and i also baught a Canon FD 100-200mm F/5.6 to go with it in good but not perfect condition for 40 USD:
The price i guess was a little high but that was the price the local markets was on in my country anyway (expensive to live here). I wanted something really good and found out that the F-1 was a flagship in its time so thats why i went for it.
Been doing alot of reading on shooting, i want to do some cyberpunk night time photography, B/W or colour, does not matter, however im curious to if i need a tripod when using no flash on a 400 ISO film with that 50mm aperture.
>>
>>3116050
*Bought
$360 is a lot, but whatever, F-1 is great.
Yes you do need a tripod, and 400 speed is fine, I would also suggest getting a shutter release cable to minimise shaking.
Also you mean 50 mm focal length, because the 1.4 aperture is fine. 50 mm is kind of tight, but you can make it work.
Sprod (ID: !sprodiehes)
Recent Photo prize box 2017-07-15 12:19:11 Post No.3114684
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Recent Photo prize box 2017-07-15 12:19:11 Post No.3114684
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: TMB Begins.jpg (686KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
686KB, 1200x800px
Recent Photo prize box
Sprod (ID: !sprodiehes)
2017-07-15 12:19:11
Post No. 3114684
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hello friends, over the past two weeks I walked the Tour du Mont Blanc.
I came, I saw, I photo'd
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 13:07:15 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800
30 Posts / 17 Images
View this topic
>>
File: walkers.jpg (772KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
772KB, 1200x800px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 13:08:31 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800
>>
File: Rifugio La Casermetta.jpg (713KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
713KB, 1200x800px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 13:11:01 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800
>>
File: Courmayeur snug.jpg (1MB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1200x800px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:07:15 13:26:12 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800
File: LightR2.jpg (2MB, 4896x3264px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 4896x3264px
Just some snaps from around my County.
I primarily shoot rurex and landscape snapshits for fun.
Almost all photos on my trusty Xt10.
Be prepared for malicious use of white borders.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-T10 Camera Software Google Color Efex Pro 4 4.3.24.12 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 800 dpcm Vertical Resolution 800 dpcm Image Created 2017:07:01 11:20:01 Exposure Time 3 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Brightness 1/2 EV Exposure Bias -1.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4896 Image Height 3264 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
20 Posts / 14 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 34510318523_4f8f2eb5e0_k.jpg (2MB, 1365x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1365x2048px
>>3113620
>>
File: 34804582880_90b45b5702_k.jpg (709KB, 1365x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
709KB, 1365x2048px
>>3113624
>>
File: 34834040184_c4cc2e8dde_k.jpg (944KB, 2048x1365px) Image search:
[Google]
944KB, 2048x1365px
>>3113625
Anonymous
/rpt/ - recent photo thread 2017-07-10 08:02:06 Post No.3111454
[Report] Image search: [Google]
/rpt/ - recent photo thread 2017-07-10 08:02:06 Post No.3111454
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_20170708_024805_853.jpg (502KB, 1616x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
502KB, 1616x1080px
/rpt/ - recent photo thread
Anonymous
2017-07-10 08:02:06
Post No. 3111454
[Report]
[View this topic]
ITT we post snapshits and pictures that don't deserve their own thread
If you post a lot just make a new thread (to keep /p/ from dying)
Previous >>3109028
251 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_4382-1.jpg (1MB, 1000x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x1500px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 760D Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Exposure Time 1/2000 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias -1.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Focal Length 24.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: DSC00273.jpg (2MB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1200x800px
Meh
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2017:07:10 21:58:32 Exposure Time 1/1600 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 320 Brightness 3.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: DSC00239.jpg (982KB, 1200x800px) Image search:
[Google]
982KB, 1200x800px
Meeh
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2017:07:10 22:00:38 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Brightness 4.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
File: nikon 1.jpg (121KB, 1419x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
121KB, 1419x1500px
Last year I bought a Nikon 1 J1 on the recommendation by a friend. Cost me around $100, bit of a starter camera. I was getting into photography as a hobby and it served me well. It took me until last month to decide to buy a tripod. I found one at a Goodwill and brought it home.
It was pretty busted, though still functional. I mounted my camera and took pictures. Worked fine. Today, I was bringing it from my room to another and the mounting piece that attaches the camera to the tripod popped off. My camera tumbled to the ground hitting conveniently placed throw rugs, and it snapped in half.
I was mortified. I know little about photography and less about cameras. I did some research and my bayonet mount ring broke? I read that these on this model are notoriously cheap. Made from plastic and easy to break. So, now I'm looking at repairing a device that I am totally unfamiliar with by using parts that I know nothing about.
My cheapness has caught up to me. Using faulty and busted equipment to hold my camera. I feel like an asshole. Tell me, /p/, is it worth it to spend the $10 on a replacement bayonet mount and attempt to fix it myself? Or, should I use this time to upgrade? Buy a better camera and save myself the hassle. What would you do?
This is my fist time posting. I'm sorry if this doesn't belong. I'm looking for advice. Not necessarily the steps involved in fixing my camera. I'm not made of money. But, I also want a better camera. I feel like such a piece of shit breaking my camera. But, I also feel like it was going to happen eventually.
35 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3110044
Replace the part but also look into getting a better point and shoot. I'm also an owner of the nikon j1 and it's pretty flimsy. The build quality is dogshit, made of plastic and so are the lenses. It doesn't take bad pictures, it's just that it doesn't have support for older lenses and you have to get an adapter even for nikon lenses. Save up for a starter dslr kit.
>>
>>3110044
Is this system dead yet?
>>
>>3110063
I'm gonna level with you. I love taking shots of nature. Natural shots, trying to capture energy. But, I mostly use it for lewds. I can't figure how to program the timer and I have to go up to it between every shot I take. I don't have the remote. I bought it used. I've handled one of those cameras you speak of just last month. It was very nice! It had a lot of options and took great pictures. I want something that takes good pictures and videos of me and also outside shots of nature. Do I really need to drop $500+ on a kit to do that? I dream of taking quality shots. Learning more about lighting and composition. I guess I need decent equipment to do that?
>>3110071
I don't know what you mean.
29 Posts / 10 Images
View this topic
>>
>>
File: stream.jpg (126KB, 533x800px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 533x800px
3
>>
File: P11674_143214_10.jpg (42KB, 1040x1536px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 1040x1536px
Noob here who only have an old Canon 300D and a Xiaomi Mi4. How to take meaningful photographs?
11 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3113196
use the mi 4 for snapshits
get a 50 prime, a 35 prime
and a zoom 70-200 for non snapshits
>>
did you take that? I love it
>>
File: P11674_143322_10.jpg (206KB, 1040x1536px) Image search:
[Google]
206KB, 1040x1536px
>>3113229
No, no. Of course not.
It's a Wolfgang Tillmans's photo, from a collection about the Concorde.
Lads I present to you the only camera you will ever need.
82 Posts / 20 Images
View this topic
>>
What about the G2?
>>
>>3110666
Electronic Clusterfuck: The Camera
Enjoy your fancy paperweight kid.
>>
>>3110666
I wish they would do a Contax G2 revival. It's like with all the other good film cameras - what will happen when they'll break? All of them.
I mean all those mechanical Nikon f-whatevers are here to stay. But it's sad that eventually all the mju 2s and Contax Gs are gonna die.
It's sad that almost nobody produces 35mm film cameras anymore. Only ones that are left are xpan and Leica (?)
File: Fujifilm_CZ_135_36_Fujicolor_Superia_152720[1].jpg (48KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
![Fujifilm_CZ_135_36_Fujicolor_Superia_152720[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/F0ZuvU6.jpg "Fujifilm CZ 135 36 Fujicolor Superia 152720[1]")
48KB, 500x500px
Why does this exist? Everyone knows that no one has ever taken a good photo at ISO 800 or with a lens slower than f/2
10 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Because digital noise doesn't correspond to analog grain. Color negatives doesn't even have grain, simply you'll get a correct exposure at that iso as it happens with 400 or 160 or 100 ASA. Also not always the value of a picture comes from sharpness, deep depth of field and correct exposures.
>>
>>3115456
>no one has ever taken a good photo with a lens slower than f/2
WHAT?
>>
>>3115503
2.8 masterrace.
File: DSC00070.jpg (1MB, 3376x4803px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 3376x4803px
Hey /p/ where do you guys go to print your pictures?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model ILCE-6000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.6 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 57 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:06:04 23:36:03 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/16.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/16.0 Brightness 9.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 38.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
20 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3115245
at the "Resize Your Snapshits" store!
>>
>>3115247
>my retarded dial up internet can't load an image .4mb over the request in the sticky
>I'm autistic and need to let EVERYBODY know because change is hard
>>
File: IMAG0939.jpg (3MB, 1791x2483px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 1791x2483px
>>3115245
At the photo store
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model HTC Desire 620 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.3 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1824 Image Height 3264 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:09 14:31:08 Exposure Time 1/36 sec F-Number f/2.4 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 600 Lens Aperture f/2.3 Brightness -4301/125000 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Unknown Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 2.96 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1791 Image Height 2483 Exposure Index 314 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Digital Zoom Ratio 1.0 Scene Capture Type Unknown Gain Control Unknown Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
File: 1002880[1].png (85KB, 700x700px) Image search:
[Google]
![1002880[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/nyPjtRa.png "1002880[1]")
85KB, 700x700px
I feel like knocking one of those anti μ 4/3rds troll threads off the board.
I'm not a pro photographer. I have a different job. If I was shooting for a wedding or something more dignified like scat porn or sports, or photo journalism sure I'd use a full frame with one of those f/2.8 zoom lenses. But I am not and you know what? For most of the history of photography we didn't have this 1,000,000,000 point autofocus super sharp glass what ever bullshit.
People took great photos with fast film and f/8. People still take great photos on even this board with point and shoots or lomo. Hell there are billions of photos that more people will look at that were taken on cell phones than any of the shit you have taken.
It doesn't matter what gear you own, the best camera is the one you have with you when you see something that needs a photo taken.
And all the megapixels, lens sharpness, sensor size and what ever bullshit don't mean shit if you aren't able to take a picture of anything interesting.
31 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: VöÄäÄäÄäÄ.png (84KB, 248x378px) Image search:
[Google]
84KB, 248x378px
>And all the megapixels, lens sharpness, sensor size and what ever bullshit don't mean shit if you aren't able to take a picture of anything interesting.
Go back to taking photos and don't embarrass yourself by posting truisms like this.
>>
>>3115165
>a picture of anything interesting
Can we have a argument about what is and isn't interesting please.
>>
>>3115171
Hot girls are interesting.
File: floppy_feat[1].jpg (159KB, 1600x840px) Image search:
[Google]
![floppy_feat[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hidr2z7.jpg "floppy feat[1]")
159KB, 1600x840px
> he has never used a floppy disk camera
14 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
You obviously don't know what you're talking about.
>>
Its all I shoot
Everybody knows
CCD noise>>>> film noise>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shit>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CMOS noise
>>
This was my introduction to digital photography in high school. It blew my mind that I could take a photo and have it on the computer. Mind blown in 2001