Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 287. page

>>2945256
Find a new teacher

>>2945265
Look up Bill Foley
Is he just that disinterested in his students?
He seems to hate his job.

>>2945256

i like it a fucking lot.

light in her face is pretty dramatic, also, lots of character, is she an actress? colors are a bit shit. show more.

>I found these in my garage.

unless they were in cold storage don't expect much out of them.

the agfa does x-process well so you might give that a try regardless

File: Lincoln vs Leon XV Promo.jpg (224KB, 1102x514px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 1102x514px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: hXrHt5k.jpg (16KB, 356x356px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 356x356px

>>2943264
Please please PLEASE scan those covers and post them here.

You have no idea how much I would appreciate
it.

hi bby
I missed you

File: 1469275063412.jpg (277KB, 324x632px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 324x632px

>>2942359
>dat velvia
erryteim

File: 2image131.jpg (535KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 1024x1024px

>>2942362
I missed you too.

>>2942366
Oh yeah, Velvia pushes it to the limits every day.

Another from that same mountain range but half hour later in more golden hour light.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Alex Burke
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5725
Image Height	5753
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:10:07 13:24:21
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	1024

>projecting his suicidal thoughts this hard
it's okay OP we're here for ya

File: 1450714553313.jpg (98KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 960x960px

>>2936677
pretending to know anything about psychology in a photography board

>old stuck in old ways
>old dog cant learn new trigs
>gotta pull a trig from the old bag since i will never agcept new tegnology
>oh these yungsters, better try and poke at their ego
>why am i carrying 25 lbs in lenses
>oh its because that yungin wants to kill himself yeah yeah
>kys senpai 1999 was a long time ago


>pic related taken with the superior master race iphone 7 plus

File: IMG_0019.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

I got the 7 Plus a couple of days ago but have only managed to test the camera in low-light situations so far (pic related). The 56mm lens is only f2.8 so I look forward to seeing what it can do in actual daylight.

ps
also ask darkroom questions excreta

what sort of chemistry do you use

File: image.jpg (150KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 720x1280px

>>2933918
Jesus Christ that looks like a fucking unit.
I don't have picture of my actual set up but it's cheaply rigged up but I don't mind the results and it's impossible to find equipment out here. I'm using a vivatar e34 for 35mm and 6x6, always use Ilford chem for dev and fix, rapid fixer and pq dev (I think that's what it's called) and an old used set of contrast filters that I have to handhold over the lens because the mount broke and they're the circular ones not the square insert style (ala Ilford multigrade). I do have a question though, the e34 didn't come with the 6x6 carriers and I've tried making some and they don't preform as well as I'd like, what's the best subsitute for carriers or is there anybody (long shot) that has used a e34 or any E vivatar enlarger that has a solution? Supposedly Holga rebranded this enlarger not long ago and there were replacement carriers sold new but they're no were to be found now. Oh and also what's a good 75mm lens for 6x6, and what easels do people use when you're printing larger then 8x10?? And sorry about the image size it's straight off Instagram chat no clue its size.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Instagram
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	720
Image Height	1280
Scene Capture Type	Standard

There's no noise, but it's soft as fuck and shows corner smearing.

>>2949682
Thanks,

I read after I got the lens that the Makinon was soft and the edges were bad. Only paid 20 for it. I recently watched a youtube tutorial about using apeture mode with zebra-ing and red peak focusing.

Think this is going to help me make sure more is in focus.

I noticed though that the f-stop on this lens clicks into place but I don't see much difference when shooting. Don't see any less light or more light from turning the f-stop.

Theres no noise in this photo. Tue colored edges are called chromatic aberrations, and are a function of that shitty lens design.

I use adapted lenses on my A7ii, and cheap ones are this bad.

Try stopping down, and it will make this picture sharper

im on it!

File: 1476919172071.jpg (308KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1000x750px

here you go :0)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6s Plus
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:20 01:38:57
Exposure Time	1/2404 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	25
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	10.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	750
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 1476919172071 (Copier).jpg (523KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 1440x1080px

:D

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6s Plus
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:20 01:41:26
Exposure Time	1/2400 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	25
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	10.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

Was wondering the best way to grow your photo Instagram Accts??? Thought this would be the best place to ask :)

>>2949526
1. Post stuff worth looking at

2. Follow people and like their pics

>>2949538
I figured following others will help me branch out maybe get them to check out my stuff as well

But anyone on her have a lot of followers? like 10K and up?

>>2949498
This is from a lamp right? I don't know how to edit this but it seems like the flicker frequency on the bulb/lamp is fucked up. I do video work and a lot of times I encounter this bullshit from cheap lights, lowering refresh rate usually mitigates it, so I would imagine shooting at a lower shutter speed would help this next time you encounter it while you're shooting.
Your mask idea sounds like it'll work well imo

>>2949498
Why no depth of field in this? That looks completely unappetizing the way you've presented it. Pull back a little and shoot it so the plate is in focus front to back. Chef spent all that time preparing it and making the presentation just right and you go and fuck it up with 'my bokeh'.

>>2949631

Can you help me understand your aesthetic preference here? I wanted an intense close up, but I think what you're suggesting is put all three dates into focus, right? I don't want it to look too clinical, but I do want to use DoF better, like you're saying. I figure if my composition includes at least some representation of the ingredients, chef would be ok.

People who rarely use their cameras to take photos are brandnazis, prove me wrong.

>>2948876
Nikon cuck fanboi detected***

>>2948867
ME NIKON, YOU JANE

>>2947657
there is a box in the way ..

>>2947657
no, it's shit. the model looks disgusting, nappy hair, shit makeup, random blue eye liner, nigger shoes, random box with ugly colour palette. framing is shit, lighting is shit.

into the bin it goes. wh

>>2947667
thank you

File: DSC_1912 (1).jpg (241KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Aperture 3.6
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:29 18:32:45
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: DSC_1894.jpg (271KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1000x667px

that's all from me!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Aperture 3.6
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	52 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:09:29 18:26:21
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: edit1.jpg (4MB, 4000x6016px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4000x6016px

>>2947272

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3200
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	970
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	51 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6016
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:16 05:22:09
Exposure Time	4 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	34.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6016
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 29638491043_f8c46e0e0e_c.jpg (228KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 800x600px

2/13

File: 29638498473_a0a3a2c0fe_c.jpg (236KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 800x600px

3/13

File: 29972017880_24015f80ef_c.jpg (242KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 800x600px

4/13

you could have used google to find an answer. jpeg is compressing your image and making your image smaller so to say. With that loss you might not be able to work on your picture properly and won't be able to get things out of the lost information. Shoot in raw and work with photoshop. Jpg is only an end product while raw is a in between step.

File: PA110852.jpg (797KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]

797KB, 640x800px

>Jpeg: Select white balance before you shoot. Raw: Select white balance after you shoot.
>Jpeg: Choose from very basic picture profile options before you shoot.
Raw: Carefully create a picture profile of your own, by hand, tuned for each individual image. Or, select from one of many high quality plugins, presets, filters, etc. Or a combination of the both.
>Jpeg: Be stuck with default in-camera noise reduction and sharpening, which is crude and vague due to the speed at which it must be processed on such a small device.
Raw: Carefully clean up & do spot removal after creating a custom noise reduction profile for each image. Resize your image to whatever size you need, and use any of many very high quality post sharpening tools to pull detail from your camera you might not have though possible after shooting jpegs.
>Jpeg: Highlights which go to 256 white are lost forever.
Raw: Highlight range extends past the normal "256/100%" barrier, and modern raw converters like Lightroom can interpolate vague yet colored highlight detail even beyond the raw limit.

These aren't all of the benefits of raw, just a handful which may be relevant for your next steps in photography.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

I've been shooting RAW/JPG(fine) with two separate memory cards since my camera has two slots. Am I wasting space shooting JPG?

>>2944501

>tfw the OP image of this thread is the most marketing Pentax gets all year

>>2944501
Too late senpai >>2944488

File: 26687943012_ec95798c52_k.jpg (487KB, 1362x2048px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 1362x2048px

>>2944518
why don't people like cute cameras