File: nicolasjanowski_a-city-blurred-4.jpg (2MB, 5411x3607px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 5411x3607px
What is the best way to take quick and close flash pics with a digital/mirrorles camera.
Best config? and focus settings?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.5 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:08:26 15:37:41 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 500 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 5.04 m Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
21 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2949723
>with a digital/mirrorles camera.
cucked.
also why dont you email nicolas?
>>
>trying to emulate gilden
>digital
>flash
>focus settings?
lmao at your life.
>>
>>2949733
>digital/mirrorle
reflexxxx
File: saudek-hyperbole-31.jpg (479KB, 1200x1698px) Image search:
[Google]
479KB, 1200x1698px
Is there some magical way to obtain reasonable resolutions of known photographer's works? I do not plan on stealing/printing them, I just want to be able to see some details without traveling to Prague or paying 500$+ for a single reprint and the ones available/fount on google are in really, really bad quality.
Jan Saudek is fine example of that, I'm unable to find any of his works really in reasonable resolution.
Is there a way?
Also favorite photographers and inspirations threat.
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2949653
Google reverse image search.
Specify large.
Hope for the best.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=jan+saudek+art&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJk6Vn0EhmPHAaiwELEKjU2AQaBAgCCEMMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEiiSDucPlxmAGpgZxA_11EfMYxg_18EdQs1yy8OtUs_1S2nJLY6_1i3tI-wjGjCemYXkMPf-HpOgPxYrYVcFgzB2UKdknoNQWYKit39ArJTQlCgYfB4iOfOTG6Jn9S4gBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBLm18UoM,isz:l&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj13MnSnujPAhVK2GMKHaUWA4gQ2A4IHigE&biw=1472&bih=689
>>
What are you? Stupid? Every famous photographer has books out there. And if you don't look for a limited original edition shittery, you can get a second hand collection book in a big format for 25€, for example from saudek. Are you retarded or something?
>>
>>2949958
herpin teh derp
http://www.saudek.com/en/jan/eshop.html?typ=3
File: Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-G7-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GX8-size-comparison.jpg (50KB, 720x343px) Image search:
[Google]
50KB, 720x343px
I think I have narrowed my choices down for a video shooting DSLR to a GX8 or a G7.
My reason for leaning towards the GX8 is the body is weather sealed and im not looking to hold onto it forever plus I live in NYC and winter is coming.
However idk if the g7 and gx8 are the exact same video wise.
Anyhow, I get a g7 I will use the kit lens for now but idk about the gx8, you guys have any good lens recommendations for it?
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Get the G80/81/85.
It has better IBIS and is also weather sealed.
I have the G7 and no IBIS does suck. Especially with non-perfect equipment
>>
>>2949515
>>2949470
Pressed Reply too early.
First: Go into the /gear/ or /vid/ thread!
Second: Don't buy with kitlens.
If your Budget is small get the 25mm 1.7. it's below 200 bucks.
If your Budget is big get the 12-35mm 2.8. it's parfocal and stabilized, which is awesome for Video.
Also, look into some Vintage lenses. It's Fun as fuck. Check out a nifty fifty for Portrait. And some 180-300mm primes like the Chinon 200mm 3.5. it's a Blast.
>>
>>2949519
Thanks man I will do both of those things, is the /vid/ thread actually popular?
File: spyder-spyder5-datacolor-pro-calibration-screen-print-photography-slrlounge-7.jpg (126KB, 649x443px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 649x443px
Do you colour calibrate your monitors? What do you use? Thoughts?
I'm planning to get one but it's really hard to tell differences between many models.
30 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
I need to... but, first I need a better notebook...
>>
>>2949298
Really doesn't matter too much as people who view your stuff will always see something different, from phones to TVs, to computers, also doesn't matter unless professional work, but at that point you're invested and you can probably afford pricey monitors at $1000+ and they don't really need adjusted
>>
I use a ColorMunki because it was cheap and does well enough.
>>2949312
Nope. Even $3000-5000 monitors have to be calibrated. Higher end monitors give you a larger color gamut and stay accurately calibrated longer.
The goal of calibration for electronic viewing is to ensure the image has been created in an environment that is as accurate as possible so that the variance of color and density seen on other devices is due only to the inherent limits of that device and not compounded by the inaccuracy of the device on which it was created.
For print applications, color calibration is even more important since the print directly reflects the accuracy of the device on which it was created.
File: a83ca084dc5b11bb32aa776690c1dcbf.jpg (120KB, 564x749px) Image search:
[Google]
120KB, 564x749px
Hi guys, would love some help here.
So ive been reading, lurking, watching videos for what feels like forever now. I am not a rich man but I want to make movies very badly, at the age of 22 I feel my potential time frame to make such things happen is closing (though that may seem stupid, idk)
Anyhow, after lurking and almost buying a T5i I think I may have decided upon buying an old Panasonic GH2 and installing the Sanity hack but I cannot decide on what lens to get. I do not think I will be holding on to the GH2 for very long as I want to upgrade to a GH4 in a few months but right now I really want something to practice on.
With that in mind what lenses should I look at? The most popular lens that I have seen is the sigma 18-35, im not sure if I would need a converter for this lens though.
What do you guys think I should get? Am I making a bad decision buy getting the GH2? There are so many fucking cameras and they all have flaws and depending on who you ask you will always get a different answer...
>Inb4 get a sony a7s
I would love to but no they do not go under 1k.
10 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2949049
my tipp is to use the video thread.
>>
>>2949049
Same doubts as yours.
Gone for a G7.
Goddamit camera, is perfect, and a wonderfull way to practice on.
I'll dump some screenshots from some frames of scenes I've made.
Remember, moreover, it's not important the camera, but what you have in the front of it
>>
File: 2016-10-19 (4).png (643KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
643KB, 1920x1080px
>>2949389
File: s40_front_blk.jpg (25KB, 450x282px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 450x282px
What's your no need to upgrade camera?
33 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Bronica SQ-A. Haven't seen the need to upgrade for 10 years now.
>>
Any of nikon's D3××× series since D3200.
Brilliant cameras.
>>
>>2948900
Xpan and this desu, with the 40, 80 and 150 I don't even feel the need for new lenses.
File: bridge_itn.jpg (443KB, 801x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
443KB, 801x1000px
Posting some stuff from a walk around new york on sunday. Shot my 8x10 loaded with expired Fuji Internegative film, rated at ISO 1.5. I was able to do 8 second exposures in full sun, and got some great motion blur. Still scanning and editing but overall, pretty stoked.
This was 2 minutes at F/11, just after the sun went below the skyline in Manhattan.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1200 dpi Vertical Resolution 1200 dpi Image Created 2016:10:18 17:21:57 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 801 Image Height 1000
33 Posts / 10 Images
View this topic
>>
File: wallITN.jpg (981KB, 801x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
981KB, 801x1000px
This wall was covered for 40 years by a granite facade and when they removed it to renovate, they exposed graffiti from 1976. South Street, tip of Manhattan.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Created 2016:10:18 17:17:18 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 801 Image Height 1000
>>
>>2948813
thats cool as fuck. great stuff.
>>
File: bridge 2.jpg (409KB, 1000x800px) Image search:
[Google]
409KB, 1000x800px
>>2948822
thanks! It's really hard to color balance and I'm on a laptop but I'm super excited. I think I underexposed this and the V700 did a hail mary to recover what it could. The motion blur on people is what attracted me to it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1200 dpi Vertical Resolution 1200 dpi Image Created 2016:10:18 17:58:11 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 800
File: 7bfe7a1ba0f4ae37572e65f672c48954.jpg (34KB, 500x334px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 500x334px
How do you get this painterly look of film with digital?
I don't have good editing skill so I can't put my finger on what exactly creates it. It's not the grain. It's not the lack of sharpness. It's something else but I don't know what.
19 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
just find some good pre-made filters for light studio and voila
>>
>>2948691
The digital look almost always shines through these filters. I think some more sophisticated editing is required.
>>
>How do you get this painterly look of film with digital?
u cant.
that glow you see there is light leaking through the positive film. real soft light fusing with the actual image. cant fake that
>inb4 digiplebs claim to be able to emulate that look
>inb4 digiplebs wont upload a single picture proving that claim
michaeljacksonpopcorn.jpg
Anonymous
Any reason why CCD noise looks better than CMOS noise? 2016-10-18 03:34:54 Post No.2948381
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Any reason why CCD noise looks better than CMOS noise? 2016-10-18 03:34:54 Post No.2948381
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 25439-4429821.jpg (74KB, 1023x787px) Image search:
[Google]
74KB, 1023x787px
Any reason why CCD noise looks better than CMOS noise?
Anonymous
2016-10-18 03:34:54
Post No. 2948381
[Report]
[View this topic]
CMOS noise gives some really ugly green dots.
Meanwhile CCD noise looks like film noise.
When will CCD tech catch up with CMOS tech?
18 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2948381
>film noise
you mean grain?
cmos is shit but gives a larger scope for post processing in computer. That's the only advantage it has.
>>
>>
>>2948381
Because the photosites of a cdd are bigger than the photosites of cmos. Cmos have a convertiser lum/singal in each photosite and cdd have a convertiser in each line that make bigger place for the sensibility surface and less noise
File: stock-photo-178141531.jpg (124KB, 665x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
124KB, 665x1000px
Newfag here. Like.. new. Very new. Hi!
It says I should expect to be judged harshly so come on please, I'm ready.
This shot has been taken during a training session with a friend, a beginner model. No expectation whatsoever, as she needed to be..."broken" on the self confidence level.
Still much work to do, hence the name of the picture: Shy
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 998 Image Height 1500 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:10:18 02:05:56 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 665 Image Height 1000
20 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>2948285
get out from here, we don't need your well done bw portrait meme.
pretty nice actually. But don't expect much from this board.
>>
>>2948292
hehe I'm 15 years late to the party and pretty much knew 4chan from when its best or its worst come up on other platforms
However, I discovered /p/ tonight and am happily surprised to see people answer newbie questions, share advice and critiques... That's a community in its own way!
Thank for the feedback
>>
>>2948285
I get that she is shy, which is perfectly fine, especially since she is new. But the way she has crinkled that shirt and puffed it up in the chest area doesn't look good to me. Also her covering up her chin is kind of distracting.
Also whatever you did to the lighting on her face in post doesn't look very good to me.
Otherwise, great work anon. And don't be intimidated by this board. Most users on here are fucking losers who are just jealous and angry they suck so much. But occasionally you'll get a good critique or have a nice conversation.
File: DSCN0961.jpg (3MB, 4608x3456px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 4608x3456px
I took this photo yesterday as practice for an upcoming airshow this weekend. How did I do?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON Camera Model COOLPIX P900 Camera Software COOLPIX P900 V1.3 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.7 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 320 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:10:16 18:22:08 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 57.10 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4608 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Down Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 100 Color Mode COLOR Image Quality NORMAL White Balance AUTO Focus Mode AF-F ISO Selection AUTO AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Auto Focus Single Area, Top Scene Mode AUTO Noise Reduction OFF
8 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
You should start by buying an actual camera I guess
>>
>>2948239
KEK
>>
>>2948227
Seems alright, ignore the gearfags. Keep ISO low and shutter speed high and you'll be fine with your camera. If it gets dark, sacrifice the low ISO (Noise is better than blur) in order to maintain a shutter speed that's the same as your focal length: If you're zoomed at 400mm, make sure the shutter speed is 1/400th or faster.
Try to pan with the aircraft as well.
Anonymous
OMG I laugh at amateur photographers. 2016-10-17 01:10:01 Post No.2947725
[Report] Image search: [Google]
OMG I laugh at amateur photographers. 2016-10-17 01:10:01 Post No.2947725
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_6142.jpg (21KB, 262x192px) Image search:
[Google]
21KB, 262x192px
OMG I laugh at amateur photographers.
Anonymous
2016-10-17 01:10:01
Post No. 2947725
[Report]
[View this topic]
> If you don't agree, guess what you are...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 262 Image Height 192 Scene Capture Type Standard
20 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
xD
I agree. OMG people who shoot with anything other than an Sony Alpha series cameras are just amateurs lol.
>>
>>2947725
Lol epic fail :3
>>
File: 1464456135912.png (160KB, 260x259px) Image search:
[Google]
160KB, 260x259px
>There are people on this board not shooting wet plate exclusivley
I need a fucking DSLR interchangeable lens camera that can support an external mic and isn't trash. (Fuck the Rebel T5) under $400. Any suggestions?
10 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Yeah kys
>>
>>2947281
cant get pentax k5 bodies on ebay for like 300. pretty sure they have a mic jack, and they are pretty damn nice camera's
>>
>>2947281
also there are literally millions of super nice old vintage pentax lenses out there you can get dirt cheap and are wonderful for video. a smc 50mm f1.8, 1.7 or even a 1.4 super takamar smc which is considered by many photographers who know wtf they are talking about to be one of the top 5 lenses ever fucking made and they are fucking awesome for video. anybody tells you other wise tell them to fuck of and die because they don't know what they are talking about. the smc super takamar 1.4 is a little radio active tho just so you know but who give a fuck its a sweet ass lens
Anonymous (ID: !!Me2iIexFVez)
Goes to moon. Forgets hood. 2016-10-13 02:26:01 Post No.2945587
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Goes to moon. Forgets hood. 2016-10-13 02:26:01 Post No.2945587
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: sddefault.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 640x480px
Goes to moon. Forgets hood.
Anonymous (ID: !!Me2iIexFVez)
2016-10-13 02:26:01
Post No. 2945587
[Report]
[View this topic]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86fJfKYi3fM
29 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
Even high tier scientists know that hoods are for plebs.
Their only purpose is to gouge money from amateurs. Real pros can handle the flare.
>>
te ala mierda con tu foto maricon inbesil jajajaja
>>
>>2945615
This guy again
File: 20161005-scan243.jpg (655KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
655KB, 1000x1000px
Hi /p/.
It's been quite some time since I made a thread, so here we go. Got a bunch of film developed. I'll be posting as I get these cleaned up and exported over the next few days.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 264 dpi Vertical Resolution 264 dpi Image Created 2016:10:12 14:04:34
119 Posts / 69 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 20161012-scan294.jpg (493KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
493KB, 1000x1000px
I don't really have any theme for these or anything, either. Just my adventures over the last year or so.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 264 dpi Vertical Resolution 264 dpi Image Created 2016:10:12 14:05:01
>>
File: 20160914-scan309.jpg (608KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
608KB, 1000x1000px
This is the same location as the OP pic.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 264 dpi Vertical Resolution 264 dpi Image Created 2016:10:12 14:05:32
>>
File: 20161005-scan319.jpg (546KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
546KB, 1000x1000px
forest fires suck
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 264 dpi Vertical Resolution 264 dpi Image Created 2016:10:12 14:05:42