Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 167. page

File: 1423642630696.jpg (10KB, 247x247px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 247x247px

It's digital. ;)

Easy digital

>>3041359
OP here. Left it out of original post by mistake.

>Please explain your reasoning behind your answer.

Because its a stupid movie about dinosaurs and only stupid people watch it.

>>3040842
It's not a movie, it's a flick

>>3040836
m3 came out before, and was marketed as a more pro model. that brown leather is disgusting though

Yes, obviously, the mirror box makes absolutely no sense anymore

Its just a fad. Optical viewfinders are superior.

Maybe if they introduced a mechanism that protected the sensor between lense changes it would get more popular. But we already have that in DSLRs.

File: _RTK6501.jpg (160KB, 800x622px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 800x622px

>>3040570
>a mechanism that protected the sensor between lense changes

Like Sigma DSLR's have.

Why isn't this more popular?
It makes so much sense.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3S
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.4.1
Photographer	Richard Kilpatrick
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.5
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	802
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	220 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2011:06:26 18:22:12
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	1.58 m
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	220.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: wintery-2.jpg (553KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: wintery-3.jpg (444KB, 690x1000px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 690x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: wintery-4.jpg (475KB, 1000x800px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 1000x800px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

www.criterion.com

File: f33a2e1a35fbc1ebd951886fe85a13f8.jpg (79KB, 535x701px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 535x701px

>>3024183

>her
>10/10

lol fuck off

Memento

>>3021483
What's the point, so you post pictures that they can use. What's there to accomplish on Instagram? Just posting pointless pictures for shallow people to like and follow you back?

>>3021492
Its just a bit of fun to do. Nothing to take so seriously.

>>3021492
99% of your pictures will be shit anyways its not like they're worth licensing otherwise you'd only post your work on stock websites which are the cancer of photography.

instagram is a good tool to get yourself known so you can make actual money off of photography doing photoshoots that you like and posting your creativity on the web for other people who appreciate it to hit you up for a shoot. unless you just take snapshits all the time for fun that you're afraid won't get any likes so you refrain from posting them anywhere other than an anonymous image board in fear of harsh criticism

way to go pal

baitu desu

>>3044198
They do use sony sensors
and they still are behind the competition
it's almost a work of art.

It's kinda like leica, only without rangefinding, awsome lenses and top notch image quality.

>>3043552
All I see is 6 people that will have, generally speaking, the same boring picture. I would have walked away right there

>>3043553
I left within the first hour. It was ridiculously stupid. It began with about 100-200 people waiting around half an hour after it was supposed to start, before some random hipster crawled on top of a picnic table and began introducing the names of several IG famous models and photographers who were there that day. Then he went on to ask some random trivia question about his publication (Does anyone know where ____ Magazine originally started?) It took four minutes for someone to finally answer, and he "awarded" them a copy of this magazine. I guess it's cool, though, that they're giving away a free Fujifilm XT-20 to the best picture taken at the event.

>>3043552
Looks like beta losers drooling over the only girl there.

Just like any meet up on 4chan/

>>3042453
Big part of the appeal is the era when those pictures were taken.

>>3042454
lol, that sounds retarded. says who, by the way?

>>3042463

Says me bitch suck my dick

File: IMGP5966.jpg (685KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 1200x798px

Prime example of a chameleon fox, in this photo it is imitating a big hairy snake.
Not in this photo: shaking off the water nicely before lazily running away. Just foxy things.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMGP5992.jpg (743KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

743KB, 1200x798px

Some kind of moose.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: IMGP5994.jpg (747KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 1200x798px

Must be some kind of diving water moose. In this photo, you can see it is testing the depth of the water but it was too shallow.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

Who gives a fuck

>>3042332
This.

/thread

File: katze.jpg (244KB, 674x1000px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 674x1000px

there you go..

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1200D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:19 11:35:32
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: tiger.jpg (190KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 667x1000px

and another one..

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:19 11:35:32
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: DSC_0617.jpg (621KB, 1222x812px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 1222x812px

as usual

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D90
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	736
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2014:08:18 13:13:00
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

Is that the F?

>>3040222
yes im jelly.

that hanimex must be ass, but looks 80s as fuck.

cameras used to have killer looks, now they all look like bland shit or gay retro memery, what went wrong?

The shit I'd give for a full frame sensor in a mju ii body goddamn

File: 1457652851203.jpg (166KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1024x681px

I'll try, if you explain this one.

>>3039104
Halloween gone wrong..

I explained it. Now your turn.

>>3039108
US version of arian cleopatra gone wrong.