How good are your photographs, /p/?
https://everypixel.com/aesthetics
>>3040929
>98.6%
Not even good enough to be a 1%er, let alone a 0.01%er.
>>3040929
bullshit
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
ahahahah
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:03:17 19:20:16 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1398 Image Height 503
Recent Portrait Thread
The lens is focused on her tits, not on her face. Relatively bad mistake.
I think the pose is overall pretty good, as is her hair makeup and clothing.
In a perfect shot, there would be more light on her face but then you need a dedicated light for shooting. Looks like you just used a lamp that was already next to the bed.
Is this your one portrait? It's generally frowned upon on 4chan to create a thread if you only have one thing to contribute.
>inb4 "b-b-but it's a general!!"
>>3027758
I have more.
anybody knows what these are called + where I could find them?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Bottom, Right-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2968 Image Height 1668 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3057883
those are tennisrackets anon, i'd try a sports supply store
obvs. not the rackets but thanks haha
I mean the translucent picture with the metal frame
>>3057883
They are in fact tennis rackets, try jerry's on the corner of 37th and main street, jerry sure knows his rackets.
>Tfw suck at landscapes
>Wanna git gud but I feel crop is hindering it
>Line up shots in viewfinder looks nice, F16
>Take photo, looks meh
>Get home still looks meh
>Mom randomly printed some of my shitscapes
>Suddenly look a bit better
I just want to take good landscapes
Also I shoot pentecks, and I'm too poor to be jumping up to f00l frame.
>>3057763
Don't shoot at noon. Don't clip highlights.
Blaming a crop sensor for your shit technique is like blaming the car for losing the race when you can't even get it into second.
>>3057763
crop has nothing to do with whether your photos are good or not you fucking pleb, you suck not the camera
this is probably bait tho
kill yourself
>>3057763
Dont need ff for landscapes nigger
wtf
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
I'd be there too if I lived in the area to be honest with ya
>>3057686
Their angles are fkin terrible. No good image will come from them
>>3057690
I wouldn't. Being around that many autistic photographers would just piss me off. And while I'm sure they all got some great pics, I don't want the same photos they got. I want something different.
Taken by canon 80d 24-70 f2.8
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 80D Lens Size 18.00 - 135.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.1 Lens Name EF-S18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Left-Hand, Bottom Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:04:13 19:04:26 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 135.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Center-Weighted ISO Speed Rating Auto Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Large Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Unknown Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 133
>>3057561
>4.21 MB, 6000x4000
Fuck you.
Resize I ain't clicking that shit
In lower quality
How do you stay dry while shooting?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D200 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Photographer Matthew Saville Baldon Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 1038 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 775 Image Height 528 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2012:10:12 14:40:07 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Comment COPYRIGHT Matthew Saville Baldon Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 650 Image Height 434 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Hard Saturation High Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>3057544
pentax
Umbrella
>>3057544
They bags for like $7, this isn't even worth a thread
This thread is the new micro four memes meme format. Dude smaller sensor is better lmao
T. Lolympusonic
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1149 Image Height 832 Scene Capture Type Standard
No one says that a smaller sensor is better. They all say that a smaller format body and superior lenses is worth the tradeoff of slightly worse-than-aps-c performance.
>>3057142
t. olympucuck
>>3057144
I shoot full frame nikon and aps-c fujifilm.
Sorry mane. Try to samefag your thread as much as you want, though. You might get some bored trolls to respond.
Posting some pictures of Wisconsin. Post nature photos of whatever area you live in.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot G11 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:04:14 23:00:18 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/4.0 ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 6.10 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Blue jay I think? Not sure
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot G11 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:04:14 22:38:06 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/4.5 ISO Speed Rating 125 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.50 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot G11 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:12:28 20:31:13 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/5.0 ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias 2 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 7.41 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon PowerShot G11 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:10:29 22:48:41 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/4.5 ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 6.10 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
Opinions ? It was taken with a 18-55mm kit lens. I dislike the framing , with the fence in the bottom right and the concrete support structure of the bridge being cut off.
Yeah, it's bad composition. Also the lighting is shit. Don't try to take landscape photos between 10am and 4pm unless you're being real intentional about it.
>>3057151
On a side note , do you think it's wrong to photograph something if you love to photograph the subject for all the wrong reasons?
>>3057166
You're talking about irony but it only works if it's obvious and if there's a narrative. This photo doesn't have either.
Hello, absolute noob here.
I got a Canon AT-1 as a gift a while ago and it's recently started acting up a bit. See pics for examples. It seems to only happen with very bright shots.
Can anyone offer any advice? Is it fucked?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 9.02.001 2008.01.13 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3088 Image Height 2048
Light leak. Probably the hinge seal that's fucked.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI Camera Model QSS-32_33 Camera Software QSS-32_33 9.02.001 2008.01.13 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3088 Image Height 2048
>>3056908
Thanks.
DUDE MY PHOTOGRAPHY RELIES UPON THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF MY MODELS LMAO
in that case i'd suggest photographing paler girls.
>>3056879
I only take pictures of cute girls. Why the fuck should I take pictures of dudes if I don't care for them?
>>3056879
show me a good photo with an ugly chick
Film guys: how do you even use sub 400 film for portraiture?
>> Digital / Nikon FX photofag here.
>> 30 years old, never shot film before this year. Had to watch a youtube video to learn how to wind camera.
>> Love shooting manual primes, I think old nikkor / voigtlander lenses produce better photos than my 70-200 f/2.8 Tamron.
>> Bought a Nikon FG for $20 on a whim off of ebay, replaced the battery / light seals and I've been thrilled with it.
>> Always used Fuji pro 400H; aperture priority. Outstanding. Requires good light and wide lens to avoid a tripod, but overall very doable.
>> Got excited to try some lanscapes and loaded Kodak Ektar 100 into my camera.
>> Took like 15 frames, decided I'm done shooting landscapes.
>> Spend the next week trying to photograph anything handheld with 100 film speed.
>> Last night, I was waiting for some friends at a park, and some college girls were messing around with an entry level camera, so I offer to take photos for them on their memory card with my d750
>> Perfect sunset, also try to take photos with FG. Metering @ f/1.4 says shutter speeds still below 1/15. Seems still bright as fuck.
>> Do some quick math trying to figure out if my camera is fucked up or it's just me. Nope, camera is fine, I'm just an idiot.
>> Have the realization that I'm a faggot because I've always been so dependent on higher ISO capabilities with my digital DSLR.
My question is this:
How the fuck did anyone take photos of people with this shit in less than blinding noon-day sun without carting around off-camera flash and a tripod?
My understanding is that an f/2.8 was considered a fast lens just a couple decades ago. Today, I tried shooting a flag with a 200mm Nikkor AI-S open at f/4 in full sunlight with a tripod and couldn't even freeze the motion on a flapping flag. Did everyone outside of a studio just use 800 or higher back then?
For fun, I'll also post one of the photos I took of said girl with my D750 @ 58mm, f/1.4; ISO 800.
>>3056648
Here is the photo of the girl from that same night taken with a Voigtlander 58 f/1.4 on my d750.
>>3056648
>>3056651
Another question. Said girl has a particularly red face, not sure if makeup or skin color. Sunset also provided very warm light. Basically looked like her skin was super red. Ok, with my DSLR I just adjusted white balance and color profile in Lightroom and in 15 seconds it's fine.
Is the only option with this film camera to just carry around a pile of warming / cooling filters and gels? How did anyone keep all this shit with them casually without having a giant gear bag?
Basically, I somehow believed that being proficient at manually shooting my fancy DSLR might make me capable of film. Nope. I'm an idiot.
Here's another photo of said girl.
>>3056648
Shoulda posted in /fgt/ my man. But there are some options here. Basically use a flash, use proper film for skin colours, shoot b&w, use filters, or just say fuck it and shoot digi if you really don't care for film. Shooting low iso film just means either good light, fast lens or artificial light. Just cause you are lazy with a dslr doesn't mean it's more work with film just that with film you ought to make the image properly in camera, were as digital lets you be sloppy and do most of the work in post.
I've been shooting with a 35mm point and shoot for a while, and wanted to upgrade. Is the Yashica Electro 35 worth purchasing? If not, what is a good film rangefinder/SLR to upgrade from an Olympus Trip 35?
Buy a Nikon FE, one or two prime lenses and you're set.
>>3056632
How is the Yashica Electro?
>>3056661
IDK about quality, but I hear it's technically unreliable
What else do I need to do in the post processing part to get more out of general pictures?
>remove unusable pictures
>white balance
>crop and level
>batch process to jpg
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS REBEL T2i Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.9 Serial Number 1123501006 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2017:04:08 14:35:19 Exposure Time 1/50 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 30.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 667 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Program Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Continuous Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 2 Sensor ISO Speed 288 Color Matrix 129
it helps to kys my man
also, it helps to have an idea of where you'd like to take the photo, and work backwards from there. does that make sense? if your goal is to have a fairly straightforward representative photo, then you might not need so much editing. If you want something that's more dramatic and stylized, then it helps to have an idea of what that looks like in your head and work towards it. There are many paths to the same destination in Photoshop, and it's up to you to find them.
>>3056526
Is this one considered usable or not?
>>3056533
Dubs of truth.
KYS
Y Y
SYK