Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 128. page

It's a good cam. The flash is annoying sometimes though

>>3067166
Oh what's the problem with the flash?

For that price, go for the Ricoh GR1v.

because the people who designed the emulsions are better than most people at editing raws

also because that image has godlike light in the perfect direction against nice appealing objects

>>3065092
Well shouldn't there be digital photographers able to find the right lighting and have good editing skills?

>>3065095
There are but this is all irrelevant to you since this is just a bait thread anyway

>>3062373
Manatees go in the wildlife thread

>>3062373
what filter to get this effect

use a camera

>>3073396
Think of the picture you want, and take the steps necessary to get that picture.

>>3073396
Find the best portraits, then imitate them.

>>3073009
>Is VSCO (speaking of the LR presets) seen as a tool for plebs around here?

Everything short of large format film cameras is seen around pleb around here, so that's not a good question to ask. And obviously each person will say something different.

With that being said, I use VSCO kinda often. I do my own edits, but it's helped on a few shots where I just couldn't get the color right, so I'd just skim through some of them find one that was close to what I wanted and made changes to it. And it actually did teach me how to use some of the more complex tools in Lightroom. I'd say go for it, but don't use it as a crutch for your photos

>>3073009
Memepresets only for total losers.

Hence I always use them.

>>3073009
No worse than instagram filters senpai

Actually a bit better, now that I think about it.

However! VSCO is a lot less jarring if you shoot with specific filters in mind, so the more work you put in, the better your shot will be.

...a lot like everything else really.

File: frig.jpg (769KB, 1000x670px) Image search: [Google]

769KB, 1000x670px

Fug, forgot to resize!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:09 19:26:27
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	670

File: oorbecks.jpg (553KB, 1000x670px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 1000x670px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:09 19:27:51
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	670

File: milk.jpg (721KB, 1000x670px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1000x670px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:09 19:35:26
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	670

All of them.

>>3072495
Ex-Yugoslavia

>>3072495
Are you planning a trip? You'll need to provide more info for a real suggestion.

Neither to poor, nor to scared. I just don't care.

>>3072093
>too scared to put real prints in front of real people for real critique ??

Page, I've sat in on photoschool crits. It's a bigger backpatting circle jerk than Flickr. Art school crits are all cotton candy and soft blankets.

Go to architecture school if you want ego-shattering critiques. I've heard seen working professionals tell students they should just drop out.

>>3072128
that's badass

no its the best mirrorless system right now

Fuji film sure isn't

>>3071890
Great LF lenses, good MF lenses
Shit cameras since they abandoned the Super CCD
good colour film
shit B&W film
great but discontinued pull apart Polaroid film

Specs like these are almost irrelevant since stuff like this has been worked over so thoroughly in post.

In other words, boost your shadows my man.

>>3071805
Why would you want to waste your time with the most played-out area of photography: astrophotography

>>3071858

this isn't astrophotography, it's landscape photography with some stars in it.

File: IMG_2595.jpg (4MB, 2619x3492px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2619x3492px

>>3071498
Some market back in Seoul

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2619
Image Height	3492
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_2694.jpg (5MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 4032x3024px

>>3071499
Top of Maokong in Taipei

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_2761.jpg (4MB, 3936x2624px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3936x2624px

>>3071502
Does portraiture ever have any merit?
This was my first roll of film, Tmax400 in some shitty point and shoot, and my favourite shot is actually some portrait of my grandpa

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3936
Image Height	2624
Scene Capture Type	Standard

I honestly want to do a gallery exhibition of just xeroxed asses.

>>3071058
Are you telling me that arranging things on a scanner in very interesting and compelling ways, then hitting the scan button is not art? Because it could very well be a great concept if done well

>>3071058
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanography

>>3070934
Maybe not, but at least he's not as annoying as jew knows photo.

His shots in the double exposure video were pretty interesting.

File: IMG_2325.jpg (1MB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 6000x4000px

>>3070934
His videos make me raff at reast.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Ver.1.01
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Left-Hand, Bottom
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:26 20:18:31
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3070934
He actually do some pretty decent landscapes

It's just that his videos at drtv had to follow the format of him walking the streets of Hong Kong, so all he could shoot was le trolleys

he just prove himself to be a /p/ lurker. lol
I remember some of those arguments in some threads

>>3070753
>2017
>caring what some ugly gook has to say
You're never going to make it brah.

>>3070756

http://erickimphotography.com/blog/2017/05/05/how-to-ignore-your-haters/

looks like it

Large aperture lens (f1.4 - 1.8), Photoshop and some curves and tint fuckery.

>>3069604
Wonderful. I'm the pro now.

>>3069597
VSCO plus fujicuck camera