If anyone wants to watch check out the xbox twitch channel.
>>16440018
>console
Fucking peasants
>>16440087
Link idiot
>>16440087
>controller
Why even bother?
What is /o/'s favorite racing game?
obligatory personal fav
racing is stupid
>>16425432
That game was dildos, OP forza 4 was last good racing game
What does /o/ think of Starwood Jeeps?
Are they worthy DDs for those that can afford it?
>inb4 anti-fca posts
>>16439972
>the i'm never going to touch a dirt road starter pack
Fuck regular normie Wranglers.
>>16439976
Rather pick up groceries in this than a Highlander senpai.
>Eco
>Boost
Pick only one
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=38507&id=20475
Power from displacement is more efficient than power from turbos. When will the turbo meme die?
Never. Turbos are better for performance.
>old gt has 550 HP
>New gt has 630 HP
>New gt has same hp as old gt
Wow you really showed us OP
>>16439777
>Same mpg
Derp
Help me pick a "new" car.
Say I have around 5K and another 7K trade in value - about 12K.
Car needs to be:
Petrol
Higher than 100BHP
Prefer an NA rather than a turbo, less to go wrong.
Newish (2010 +)
Dont care about size wise, can be a two seater or a 5 door saloon.
Britfag.
>>16439482
import a twingo.
>>16439482
Bedford Rascal fits your criteria
>>16439486
Not for me, but fun cars
>Amerifat (((luxury)))
lol amerifats
Europoor luxury
Pic related
Can France do anything right?
Crossiants are pretty good.
>>16438692
French fries are pretty good too.
Their military surplus. Never used, only dropped once.
Sup /o/.
I have a 2016 WRX, about 7k miles on it. I'm considering trading it for a 2016 Challenger Scatpack. Thoughts? Good idea/bad?
Pic related, the car im looking at.
Pic is my current car.
Wrx not pulling tail like you expected? Just have depreciation fetish?
Realized your actually a baby boomer?
>>16437870
Never got the car to pull tail. I got bored of the car once I realized the stock tune on it is incredibly deceptive and it has no power aside from a short burst of turbo pull around 4k rpm. I've considered keeping the car and just modding it, but to get what I want out of it is going to take a lot. I'm not a baby boomer, I do love classic rock though.
Found this supercharged 2000 C230 that spent its entire life in Texas, with only 79,000 miles. It's $2,900. Is there something horrible about this car why I shouldn't go for it? It has a big scratch on the bumper but that's it. The history checks out.
>>16437139
go for it
>>16437139
>is there something horrible about this car?
yes. It is a merecedes
Well it's a 17 year old, supercharged Mercedes and its $2900. If you plan on daily driving it, you're probably going to spend more than that each year keeping it running.
Is it a true landbarge?
get out
>>16436970
Only if it's body-on-frame
is it?
>fwd
>Make sense
>No v8
>Targeted to chinks
What are /o/'s thoughts on the brand? I feel as if its market and design doesn't particularly focus too well on young adults, but rather those 35+.
I kinda like the new 2017 LaCrosse.
they do quite well in jd power.
1 or 2 year old ones with under 20,000 can be quite a bargain.
You can pick up a 2015 or 2016 regal 2.0T for 16,000 to 17,000.
They are still one of my favorite brands, but they've tried moving their place in the market and it kinda hurts to see them change on their formula, as necessary as it is.
After 2008, it seems like they're trying to position themselves more like how Opel is positioned, and making cars that feel more European in execution. I liked what the century used to be, I liked what the skylark used to be. It was a luxury brand in comfort only, without pretension, and their new cars don't seem to have that.
Their older cars from the 90s are terrific in value though, many are very low miles (below 60k) to be had for less than $3k.
They only exist because of China.
>that guy who has "support our troops" on his car despite being in the military
>>16436648
>Make tea not war
>US army
I have some fucking questions here.
Fuck Christians.
Fuck Muslims.
Fuck Jews.
Fuck Mormons.
Fuck Wiccans.
Fuck them all.
I have a question for you guys. EUfag here.
I'm pretty good at hand painting cars with a Paintbrush.
Is there a market left anywhere for my skills?
It seems like everyone is using sprayguns nowadays because they're easier, cheaper and quicker.
Paints have changed too. They used to flow out a lot better and cover more.
When I first started painting 15 years ago, I was turning down jobs, and worked on cars, trucks, and buses.
All the old guys were retiring or dying at that time and I guess the job died with them.
Because now I barely get one job every other month, and always from the same ever dwindling pool of people.
I haven't had a new customer in years.
I'd be happy with my own small niche.
I'm hoping it still exists somewhere.
Also discuss Rustolem method, $50 paint job, etc I guess.
>>16433606
It depends, what's special about a brush job vs spray? What makes it likely worth the extra cost and time? I understand it's likely more in depth and personal with each job, but why should a customer care? You gotta have something to market it man, I think it's neat, but whats the benefits?
Do you end up with just as good or better paint jobs? Can they be show quality? How much more time goes into prep and painting? How much extra work in finishing, cutting, buffing, etc.
>>16433606
I guess you should learn to use airbrushes, make new clients and see if those new clients might be interested in hand painting for whatever advantage that technique may have.
Or go try to get into the antique cars business, those old people might be more interested in your skills
>>16433671
This guy's got a good point. Classic restorations may have a want for that, you could even see if a local shop could use you. If you're skilled you could probably get into doing interior focused work, fine detail, pinstriping and designs, possibly murals/artwork if you're artistic at all.
Alternatively, move to the states and paint weabo things for neets who like things like the jap rising sun on their hoods.
fuck it