>2011+6
>not going on cathartic drives to forget about stress, women, and work
ISHYGDDT
>>16920552
This is a good way to deal with stress imo
>>16920552
How fast to u go on your local toe gay to forget about your oneitis
>>16920552
>going out in austin traffic to relieve stress
>no good driving roads around without driving out pretty far
Good one. Shitposting here is about all the car-related catharsis I can get.
Hello /o/ I am a 6'2 250lb person and I am about to import a 1992 nissan the r32. I was wondering if I would fit in one.thanks
Pic unrelated
>>16920530
If youre scum, you should fit just fine
>>16920530
>importing shitty jap cars for 10x what you paid for the car
Why live
>>16920551
It'll be around 2500 for the car plus 2700 for import
What's the best color for Itasha?
Should i repaint my Mazda2 to teal and put Miku stuff in there?
>>16921563
White
Is it the only acceptable custom "paint job"?
Hey /o/ I'm taking my drivers test tomorrow and was wondering if there's any good pointers, tips, tricks, etc. you guys have for me. I'm in cali btw
>>16920273
Handbrake whenever parking.
don't drive "normally"
Drive the way you did when you first started. They're looking for nervous, super conservative drivers. Go exactly the speed limit until/unless your instructor tells you "speed up a little".
Pay attention
>pulling out of dmv
>make a right here
>turns on blinker for a left
>start turning left
I SAID RIGHT
I still don't know how I managed to fuck up that bad, still passed though.
Who was in the wrong here?
>Cyclist launches road rage attack calling driver a 'f***ing lunatic' and 'terrorist' after the car failed to stop at a pedestrian crossing
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4358436/Cyclist-abuses-driver-Canberra-road-rage-incident.html
>>16920214
the cyclist is always at fault m8
>>16920214
Who was in the wrong here?
I'm sure you'll get an slew of rational, non-biased answers here on 4chan's automotive board.
>>16920219
this, they need to stop pretending they're lance armstrong and stay off the fucking roads
Miat fags, are the mazdaspeed turbo versions worth the extra cash? Or just buy an NA and turbo it?
>>16920058
Buy a Mustang. Fucking queers.
>>16920087
Nah, I like good cars.
>>16920099
And poop on your dick. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Where does this go?
In the garbage because it can brick your ECU
>>16919964
up your ass
>>16919964
Under the steering wheel senpai
Why aren't there more cars with the engines in the rear?
>>16919616
Its dumb
Twingo is RWD and rear engine
>>16919618
/thread
What kind of truck is this?
Spotted in S01E05 of True Detective
Definetelly a dodge, probably a stratus with bigger tires and a small lift.
Thats a second gen bronco dude
>>16919479
looks like a 78 bronco to me
before they were made ugly
Let's take turns and invent one stupid car tecnology
>>16919051
forward ejector seats
Ecoboost
>>16919051
Are priuses gay cars?
>>16918975
no car is gay. only OP.
>>16918975
Stupid summerfag /o/ thread
>Tuesday edition
You can hipermile in them, which is fun if you are stuck in a city with traffic.
Since there's a daily "should I get an old Porsche as my first car" thread then I guess this might be pertinent. Have you guys noticed how the 1970s-1990s transaxle era Porsches all seem to fall into a sort of a Project Management Triangle? As in, instead of having to choose two out of three in the "Fast, Cheap and Good" scheme, you have to choose between these:
>Performance
>Reliability
>Affordability
The 924 is by far the most affordable Porsche and, since it was mostly engineered with sturdy Volkswagen and Audi parts that are widely available on the aftermarket, you can at the very least expect some reliability, but the performance is nowhere on the pace of its successors. It was conceived as a slower and mildly affordable touring car to succeed the 914, much like the Boxster is nowadays, rather than an actual performance car. The North American version is particularly bad in this regard, for some weird reason it had 1/3rd of the horsepower cut down from the original European version, hence why so many Americans disdain it as not being a "real Porsche".
The 944 is still pretty affordable and the handling is widely praised as being amongst the best for a 1980s sports car but relying on it as a daily drive without any form of back-up is pure madness. Same goes for the 928, it's even more powerful than the 944 and, despite being slightly more expensive, you can still find one in decent condition for less than 10k, but don't expect anything but pain when the rare and expensive engineering intricacies and the incredibly obsolete engine computer dies down on you. Both are cheap and perform well even for modern standard but don't expect reliability from them.
The 968 is easily the most well engineered out of the four, it has superb performance (especially the Club Sports version) and, being the most recent, it is also easily the most reliable, but you're certainly not going to find one in proper working condition for less than 10k.
So yeah, take your pick, fools.
Does this go here?
>>16918270
Damn right it does, I do sort of miss /pog/.
>>16918262
>pick 2 of
>>Performance
>>Reliability
>>Affordability
Don't this kind of apply to all cars
>What's the cheapest best sports car that a man can buy these days?
>Pic and specs wanted.
Thanks.
>a man
what about women you shitlord
>>16918031
Miatn is always the nswer.
>>16918045
I'm a man so...sorry...love ya ladies.
Who is this marketed towards?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlYoAiMKGC4
Yurop gets cucked again, nothing new here.
I'm not clicking your clickbait, just point out said 10 differences.
OBJECTS IN THE MIRROR ARE CLOSER THAN THEY APPEAR
Any conceited fucks here like to take vanity pictures of your shitbox?
Post em.
>>16916924
yes
>>16916924
>VAG cars
>Vanity
KEK
More like "validating our bad taste in cars"