Nurses Open Body Bag to Check Out Big Dick

More shit nurses to make my occupation look shittier.

Aw yiss bb check my rigor mortis

>>175871
>viewed a deceased patient’s body and talked about it

I fail to see why this is a disciplinary offense. It's not like they did this in front of the stiff's family. It's just shop talk. Bantz. Black humor to cope with the morbid nature of the job. Nursing sounds like a cucked profession.

>>175936
This. If they were talking about it in front of the party of the deceased then it would be disgusting. What they did was just fuckin' about.

Were the nurses men or women? A mix of both? This is an important piece of information that fuels motive and should be taken into consideration.

>>175945
You can like harvest organs without consent. By this logic, even as a corpse, he has to right to not have random people look at his cock.
It all depends on if you think a dead person has rights.

>>175936
I'm with you here
can anyone provide an explanation for why this is a problem?
I don't understand what this guy is talking about with organ harvesting >>175947
but I think it's not that they lose the right, it's that they lose the capacity for caring about people looking at and talking about them. I think we should have codes of conduct about the way dead people are treated, but looking and talking shouldn't be one of them.

>>175964
correction
>looking and talking shouldn't be one of them
at least in the context of the op*

>>175947
A corpse absolutely has rights, but the medical professionals working on the corpse have every right to look at the subject of their trade.

This article literally says some nurses were making some jokes, then a month later another nurse decided they were offended and reported them. That they even got suspended is a mockery of the human psyche's coping mechanisms.

>>175945
Yeah, no. By that same logic a necrophiliac that is a doctor or nurse should also be free to do what he wants as long as he doesn't fuck the corpse in front of the family it's all good right? Just because you work with corpses doesn't give you the right to do whatever or treat them however you want. This counts double for medical personnel, patiens put their life, health and dignity into their hands and these nurses violated that trust.

>>175986
You know, the more I think about it the more I'm coming to realize that I don't actually agree with the sentiment that corpses have rights.

I think in this case it does come down to "what they don't know won't hurt'em". If someone fucks my corpse and I get interred or cremated just the same and no one is any the wiser, who actually cares? The necrophile gets their rocks off, my family sees me laid to rest, and I get to be useful one more time. If someone wants to talk shit about my corpse, by all means let them, just don't offend my family with it. If a bunch of people want to look at my dick and talk about how big it is then by all that is just and right, let them look. While you're at it, let them harvest all of my organs, just as long as the organs I donate on paper go to people who need them. if the rest is going to be stuck in the ground, then by all means take what you need and compost the rest.

Corpses don't have rights. Get over it, if they want them they can lobby for them.

>>175988
So should wills be declared invalid too?

>>175986
Abusing a corpse is a crime. Making fun of a dead person's wang is not.

>>175964
Maybe it was a group of faggot nurses. Faggots are usually quite degenerate by nature, so might have been a good call to discipline them.

>>176153
Well if they're into corpses, a little pain play is nothing.

>>175990
Did a corpse somehow write one?

>>175988
I'm with you 100% on this one

>>175990
They were written by a living person as a legal document to be executed upon their death. The contract is sealed, justice demands it be satisfied. Take your bullshit logic out of here.