Kamala Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand will lead Democrats to 2020

Oh that's cute, they still think democratic elections will exist.
When republicans gain a super-majority in 2018 they'll have a constitutional convention where folks like lindsey graham and ted cruz are going to decide what our constitution should look like going forward. They're going to enable their state legislatures and governors to further rape voter rights beyond recognition and the votes will exist to appoint farther right supreme court nominees.
They basically won't have a choice but to break the system because most people will be so disgusted with them at that point that they'll have nothing left to lose in preserving a sensibly representative system of government.

>>174678
They don't have to change anything. They just have to enforce what is already law. The constitution explicitly says that only "WHITE PERSONS OF GOOD CHARACTER" can become citizens. No one else has any voting rights whatsoever.

>>174678
Democracy is failed and evil system anyway. It grants temporary command to a group of people that then steal everything. And they MUST steal as much as they can. Because anything they leave on the table will be used by the next guy against them. Widespread corruption and debt and decay are inevitable consequences of Democracy. Democracy is a system without ownership. Even just having a king is better, because then people at least know who to blame.

>>174680
Oh boy, monarchist LARPers are leaking out of /his/

>>174681
Modern day Democracy and Socialism are jewish inventions designed to destroy the white man.

If you really want democracy then only a free white male landowner should have the right to vote. As it has always been.

>>174679
>All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

>>174683
At that time only free landowners were considered legal persons and it was illegal for anyone but whites to own land.
Therefore if you interpret the Constitution correctly it is clear that "Person" as defined by the constitution applies to white people only.

JUST GET A PARLIAMENT ALREADY YOU FUCKERS. THAT'LL DEAL WITH THE PRIMARIES BULLSHIT.

>>174685
Yeah, nah, parliaments a shit.

>>174680
It's literally the least evil system known to man brainlet

Every other system is the butthurt havenots seizing power and money from the haves, and then becoming the new haves / dictators. And then tyranny just swaps hands forever and the people live in misery.

>>174684
>At that time
Guess what it's not that time any more dipshit

>>174684
[citation needed]

>>174731
That's when the Constitution was written. For definitions it is important to go back and look exactly what they meant. And it's quite clear what the had in mind when they wrote down "people". Free white landowners. No one lese.

>>174733
>For definitions it is important to go back and look exactly what they meant
Show me exactly where the Constitution says the things you're saying it does, or show me the laws that say "niggers aren't people"

>>174733
Right, and since we are able to amend the Constitution, we can adapt what they said to our time.

>>174678
Good, the left are the enemy

Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Kirsten Gillibrand

Oh God the Democrat party is on worse shape than everyone thinks.

>>174740
Why? What's wrong with these two? Seem like normal people.

>>174669
>Career prosecutor
No fucking thanks

>>174741
Far left women who are only being considered because of their gender. The half nigg have even been in office a year and she has the hero of the Democrats?

>>174669
>it’s undeniable that soft support from the “Bernie wing” of the party contributed to her historic loss.
I deny it.
Clinton ignored the interests of the Bernie Bros and they rightly were not enthusiastic about her.
I'll support the Democrats when their platform states that Single Payer Healthcare is achievable in four years, not one hundred years from now.
I'll support the Democrats when they challenge the Citizens United decision and make solid proposals to reform excessive campaign costs and backroom finance deals.

>>174855
I'll be right there with you, but we both know it's not happening as the dems are too corrupt and beholden to corporate interests