https://youtu.be/wCtw__MfUcM
When a French journalist talk about America.
>>101836
Right wing in France are as mad as in the rest of the world it seems.
Saying shit like 'Obama hates America' and justifies it with poor jobs figures (fake facts) and claims that 'Obama is a Muslim at heart' (racist pseudo-insult) because he won't say the words islamic terrorism. (more fake facts?)
Obama had great approval ratings.
>>104782
That's just what the LYIN PRESS wants you to think!
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/316655-trump-attacks-ny-times-washington-post-in-tweets
Trump attacks NY Times, Washington Post in tweets
President Trump took to Twitter early Saturday morning to attack two of the nation’s most prominent newspapers, the New York Times and Washington Post.
“The failing @nytimes has been wrong about me from the very beginning. Said I would lose the primaries, then the general election. FAKE NEWS!” Trump tweeted just after 8 a.m. Eastern on Saturday.
“Thr coverage about me in the @nytimes and the @washingtonpost gas been so false and angry that the times actually apologized to its … dwindling subscribers and readers.They got me wrong right from the beginning and still have not changed course, and never will. DISHONEST,” he added.
>>105106
It was not immediately apparent what prompted Trump to launch his attacks. He frequently attacks the media in general and has specifically singled out both the Times and Post before, as well as CNN, NBC News, Fox News, BuzzFeed and others.
Both newspapers closely covered Trump’s Friday signing of an executive order suspending refugee entry into the U.S. and barring immigration from seven Muslim nations.
Despite his regular attacks, he granted an interview to the Times days ago.
-------------------------------------------------------------
>Thr
>gas
>>105110
>It was not immediately apparent what prompted Trump to launch his attacks.
I'm pretty sure Bannon fills his head with a new liberal media conspiracy every day right after breakfast. Who knows what shit he made up to tell him THIS time.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/business/media/stephen-bannon-trump-news-media.html
>WASHINGTON — Just days after President Trump spoke of a “running war’’ with the media, his chief White House strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, ratcheted up the attacks, arguing that news organizations had been “humiliated” by the election outcome and repeatedly describing the media as “the opposition party” of the current administration.
>“The media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for a while,” Mr. Bannon said in an interview on Wednesday.
>“I want you to quote this,” Mr. Bannon added. “The media here is the opposition party. They don’t understand this country. They still do not understand why Donald Trump is the president of the United States.”
>The scathing assessment — delivered by one of Mr. Trump’s most trusted and influential advisers, in the first days of his presidency — comes at a moment of high tension between the news media and the administration, with skirmishes over the size of Mr. Trump’s inaugural crowd and the president’s false claims that millions of illegal votes by undocumented immigrants swayed the popular vote against him.
>>104620
>Mr. Bannon, who rarely grants interviews to journalists outside of Breitbart News, the provocative right-wing website he ran until August, was echoing comments by Mr. Trump last weekend, when the president said he was in “a running war” with the media and called journalists “among the most dishonest people on earth.” Mr. Bannon’s remarks added to the growing acrimony between the press and a president who made attacks on the media a rallying point of his election campaign.
>Among Mr. Trump’s advisers in the White House, Mr. Bannon is responsible for putting into action the nationalist vision that Mr. Trump channeled during the later months of the campaign, one that stemmed from Mr. Bannon himself. And in many ways Mr. Trump has acted on that vision during his first week in office — from the description of “American carnage” he laid out in his inauguration speech to a series of executive actions outlining policies on trade agreements, immigration and the building of a border wall.
>Mr. Bannon is one of the strongest forces in an administration with competing power centers. A savvy manipulator of the press, and a proud provocateur, he was among the few advisers in Mr. Trump’s circle who were said to have urged Sean Spicer, the new press secretary, to give a confrontational, emotional statement to a shocked West Wing briefing room on Saturday, when the White House disputed news reports about the size of the inauguration crowd. He shares Mr. Trump’s view that the news media misunderstood the movement that the president rode into office.
>>104622
>Speaking by telephone on Wednesday, Mr. Bannon delivered a broad indictment of the news media as being biased against Mr. Trump and out of touch with the American public. That is an argument familiar to readers of Breitbart and followers of personalities friendly to Mr. Trump, like Sean Hannity of Fox News.
>“The elite media got it dead wrong, 100 percent dead wrong,” Mr. Bannon said of the election, calling it “a humiliating defeat that they will never wash away, that will always be there.”
>“The mainstream media has not fired or terminated anyone associated with following our campaign,” Mr. Bannon said. “Look at the Twitter feeds of those people: They were outright activists of the Clinton campaign.” (He did not name specific reporters or editors.)
>“That’s why you have no power,” he added. “You were humiliated.”
>>104623
>Mr. Bannon spoke in blunt but calm tones, peppered with profanity, and humorously referred to himself as “Darth Vader.” He said, with ironic relish, that Mr. Trump was elected by a surge of support from “the working-class hobbits and deplorables.”
>The conversation was initiated by Mr. Bannon to offer praise for Mr. Spicer, who has been criticized this week for making false claims at the White House podium about attendance at Mr. Trump’s inaugural, for calling reporters dishonest and lecturing them about what stories to write, and for failing to disavow Mr. Trump’s lie about widespread voter fraud in the election.
>Asked if he was concerned that Mr. Spicer had lost credibility with the news media, Mr. Bannon chortled. “Are you kidding me?” he said. “We think that’s a badge of honor. ‘Questioning his integrity’ — are you kidding me? The media has zero integrity, zero intelligence, and no hard work.”
>“You’re the opposition party,” he said. “Not the Democratic Party. You’re the opposition party. The media’s the opposition party.”
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/01/25/world/europe/ap-eu-russia-domestic-violence.html
>MOSCOW — The Russian parliament on Wednesday passed the second reading of a controversial bill to decriminalize some forms of domestic violence.
>The State Duma voted 385-2-1 to eliminate criminal liability for battery on family members that doesn't cause bodily harm. The bill that makes battery on a family member punishable by a fine or a 15-day day arrest has yet to be approved in the third reading. From the Duma, it would proceed to the upper house, largely a rubber-stamp body, and then to President Vladimir Putin's desk.
>The bill stems from a Supreme Court ruling to decriminalize battery that doesn't inflict bodily harm, but to retain criminal charges for those accused of battery against family members. Conservative activists objected, arguing it was a threat to parents who might spank their children.
>Activists picketed the Duma on Wednesday morning to oppose the bill, which has caused controversy and attracted more than 200,000 signatures online against it.
>Olga Batalina, one of the bill's co-authors, rejected suggestions that the bill would sow impunity for those who beat up their families.
>"The Criminal Code still carries criminal responsibility for battery, but now it will be applicable only for repeat offenders," he told state television. All those "who terrorize their family members, who do it repeatedly ... will face criminal responsibility."
>Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov wouldn't comment on the bill.
>A survey this month by state-run pollster VTsIOM showed that 19 percent of Russians said "it can be acceptable" to hit one's wife, husband or child "in certain circumstances." The nationwide poll by phone of 1,800 people was held Jan. 13-15. The survey had a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points.
yuo see ivan
>>103552
From the outside it seems so barbaric, if there's any Russian anons I'd love to hear what you think about this
https://youtu.be/uXom0OP3Rwk
Michael Flynn, President-elect Donald Trump's choice for national security adviser, held five phone calls with Russia's ambassador to Washington on the day the United States retaliated for Moscow's interference in the U.S. presidential election, three sources familiar with the matter said.
>The calls occurred between the time the Russian embassy was told about U.S. sanctions and the announcement by Russian President Vladimir Putin that he had decided against reprisals, said the sources. They spoke on condition of anonymity, citing internal U.S. government deliberations about the issue.
>The calls raised fresh questions among some U.S. officials about contacts between Trump's advisers and Russian officials at a time when U.S. intelligence agencies contend that Moscow waged a multifaceted campaign of hacking and other actions to boost Republican Trump's election chances against Democrat Hillary Clinton.
>On Dec. 29, U.S. President Barack Obama announced he had ordered the expulsion of 35 Russian diplomats suspected of being spies and imposed sanctions on two Russian intelligence agencies over their involvement in hacking U.S. political groups.
>The administration told Russian Ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, an hour before the decision was made public, one of the sources said.
>The phone calls between Flynn and Kislyak were first reported by Washington Post columnist David Ignatius.
>A Trump official confirmed one phone conversation between the two men on Dec. 29, and said their understanding was they did not discuss the sanctions.
>The three sources stressed to Reuters that they did not know who initiated the five calls between Flynn, a former three-star Army general who headed the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency under Obama, and Kislyak. Nor did they know the contents of the conversations, and declined to say how they learned of them.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-idUSKBN14X1YX
>One source said there was nothing intrinsically odd or wrong about a Russian diplomat speaking to a member of Trump's team following the U.S. announcement. Moscow, the source added, probably would want to have some sense of what Trump's team thought about the measures.
>That sentiment was echoed Friday by State Department spokesman Mark Toner. "This building doesn’t see anything necessarily inappropriate about contact between members of the incoming administration and foreign officials," Toner said.
TIMING
>The other two sources, however, said the timing of the calls raised a question about whether Flynn had given Kislyak any assurances to soothe Russian anger over the U.S. moves.
>If that were the case, it would have raised a possible entanglement with the Logan Act. The 1799 law bars unauthorized U.S. citizens from negotiating with foreign governments with which the United States has disputes. It is aimed at preventing the undermining of official U.S. government positions.
>Alexey Mosin, a spokesman for the Russian embassy in Washington, said: "The Embassy does not comment on multiple contacts, which are carried out on a daily basis with local interlocutors."
>Flynn raised eyebrows among some U.S. foreign policy veterans when he was pictured sitting at the head table with Putin at a banquet in Moscow in late 2015 celebrating Russia Today, an international broadcasting network funded by the Russian government.
>However, Flynn has also expressed skepticism about Moscow's intentions - a view that does not seem to fit Trump's vision of closer ties with Moscow.
>Classified documents that the heads of four U.S. intelligence agencies presented last week to Trump included unsubstantiated information compiled by a private security firm suggesting Moscow had compromising personal and financial details about Trump. Trump called a dossier that contains salacious claims about him in Russia "fake news" and "phony stuff."
>One of the sources said the U.S. actions "took the Russians by surprise." Russian officials threatened to shutter the Anglo-American School of Moscow, the source said. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov proposed tit-for-tat expulsions.
>But on Dec. 30, Putin announced that he would not retaliate. Trump praised Putin for the decision, writing in a Twitter post, "Great move on delay (by V.Putin). I always knew he was very smart!"
>Trump spokesman Sean Spicer earlier Friday said Flynn and Kislyak had spoken on Dec. 28, the day before Washington announced the expulsions and sanctions.
>But a Trump official acknowledged later in the day that they held one conversation on Dec. 29 about setting up a telephone call between Trump and Putin after Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, was aware of only one phone call between the two that day and did not know if they spoke again since.
>After the Nov. 8 election, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told the Interfax news agency that the Russian government was in touch with members of Trump's political team during the U.S. election campaign and knew most of his entourage.
>At a news conference on Wednesday, Trump declined to answer whether anyone connected to him or the campaign had contact with Moscow during the campaign and said he had no loans or business deals with or in Russia.
>White House spokesman Josh Earnest on Friday said it remained unclear whether such a call between Flynn and the Russian ambassador would be objectionable .
>"It depends on what they discussed," Earnest told reporters. He said he could not weigh in without knowing the content.
Isn't that literally their job
Trump has put in charge of the fcc a man who has repetedly stated he wants to repeal net neutrality suffice to say this could be the end of 4chan as the site doesnt bring in enough income to pay for sufficent bandwidth.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2017/01/year-donald-trump-kills-net-neutrality/amp/?client=safari
>>104949
>this could be the end of 4chan
This is why we can never have a ptoductive discussion about this shit. Emotional fuck.
>>104949
it just doesn't stop for the libtards; they just can't handle the Trump train riding into their pussies.
>>104949
>his could be the end of 4chan
good things like that don't happen m80
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/27/nbcs-chuck-todd-media-knew-how-hated-hillary-was-h/
NBC’s Chuck Todd confessed that he and others in the mainstream news media played down just how despised Hillary Clinton was in the heartland due to the fear of appearing “sexist.”
What’s more, he admitted, the mainstream media failed to “tell the stories of all Americans.”
>Mr. Fleischer replied. “And, because I do submit they’re largely from the same liberal caste, they see things through the same type of ideological lens, they’re so much more susceptible to that damning political correctness that blinds them. And they don’t see what you just said.”
>washingtontimes
lol moonies
No shit, everyone with a brain figured that out ages ago. I guess it's nice to hear one of them actually say it out loud, despite being after the fact and now inconsequential.
Thanks I guess, Chuck, for getting the truth out after the war is over. You're a real hero.
>>105244
Die Lügenpresse of the world need to go
http://tvline.com/2017/01/27/law-order-svu-roger-ailes-fox-news-episode-gretchen-carlson/
>An upcoming episode of Law & Order: SVU will be ripped from one of Fox News’ most embarrassing headlines ever.
TVLine has learned exclusively that the NBC procedural is developing an episode loosely inspired by the sexual harassment scandal that pitted ex-Fox News personality Gretchen Carlson against the network’s CEO Roger Ailes, a kerfuffle that ultimately forced Ailes to step down. Carlson, who alleged that Ailes fired her after she refused his sexual advances, ended up walking away with a $20 million settlement.
But they’ve backed off from televising their Trump inspired show… oh well.
>>105165
Considering Law & Order's tagline is literally "Ripped from the headlines," I don't see how this is /news/ rather than /tv/. And before anybody tries to go "muh librul hollywoood nbc fake news," Law & Order does all kinds of right-of-center shit, considering it's a blatantly pro-police show. During the Bush years especially it was glorified how the Patriot Act could be use to get library and phone records from *suspects* in criminal cases (having nothing to do with natsec), how laws would be manipulated and misused to strongarm suspects into giving up rights (and how even if they turn out innocent the cops would justify it with "well the asshole was having an affair anyway"), or just in general how cops acted like dicks with unnecessary force and profiling and how the show tried to justify it.
So yeah, L&O is if anything right-leaning, so don't get your panties in a knot over this /pol/tards.
>>105187
OP here. I felt that this was news about news so it fits the thread.
I totally agree that L&O is right leaning but, over the years, it has questioned many issues including the death penalty, abortion, gay rights, legal and political corruption, etc. so it can lean both ways.
A few years ago, a filmmaker friend of mine was detained in NYC and got questioned with the good cop/bad cop technique, “…just like Law and Order”. He said he had a hard time keeping a straight face.
>>105165
I still remember the episode they did with David Reimer. Shit was fucked up.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/01/trump-signs-executive-order-banning-syrian-refugees-170128033811131.html
US refugee programme suspended for 120 days and Syrian refugees barred until further notice.
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order suspending the US refugee programme for 120 days, specifically barring Syrian refugees until further notice.
Trump signed the order at the Pentagon, saying the moves would help protect Americans from "terrorist" attacks.
"I'm establishing new vetting measures to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America. Don't want them here," Trump said earlier on Friday.
"We only want to admit those into our country who will support our country and love deeply our people," he said.
I don't know what I was expecting
>"We only want to admit those into our country who will support our country and love deeply our people,"
Saudis, like the 9/11 hijackers? Pakistanis, like the San Bernadino terrorists?
>>105048
Its only been a few days jeez
How much is a life worth?
That was the crux of the argument between a Louisiana man and the woman who gave birth to his son in 2010 after taking his sperm without permission from a fertility clinic and being artificially inseminated.
The case, which has a long wound its way through the courts, landed Wednesday at Houston's First Court of Appeals where a three-judge panel was asked to reverse a trial judge's decision cutting a jury award from $870,000 to $1,900.
"The (judge) decided, in his opinion, that the law didn't allow those damages, which leaves a gap," said David Bernsen, an attorney for Layne Hardin. "We, as a society, have to decide whether this type of behavior is acceptable in Texas and I don't think it is."
Hardin won a lawsuit in 2015 against his former girlfriend, Tobie Devall, and Texas Andrology, the sperm bank that gave Devall two samples without Hardin's permission.
She gave birth to Hardin's son, then refused to allow any custodial rights with the boy, now 6. The two had a long custody battle in Louisiana, where Hardin lives.
Hardin and girlfriend Katherine LeBlanc, who have a long history and a teenage son, went to the sperm bank in 2002 in preparation for a vasectomy. The couple later broke up and he began dating Devall in 2006.
While they were dating, Hardin and Devall met with doctors at the sperm bank to discuss artificial insemination, court records show. Devall apparently never had permission to use the sperm she later took after they broke up.
In 2015, Hardin and LeBlanc won their lawsuit against Devall for taking the sperm, and Texas Andrology, for releasing the sperm without authorization.
http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Sperm-theft-lawsuit-leaves-appeals-court-weighing-10884311.php
After reviewing the verdict, state District Judge Jeff Shadwick said the law did not allow a money judgment for mental anguish and slashed the award.
On Wednesday, lawyers for Devall said the case was complicated and the judge made the right decision.
"The case defies classification," said attorney John Hoffoss. "What's the value of this child's life? You cannot have mental anguish damages for the existence of that life."
While both sides had 20 minutes to argue Wednesday, appellate courts generally take weeks or months to hand down a ruling.
Ugh.. this is a good reason why not to have sperm banks. If you can't have children naturally, that's Nature telling you something and it's just too bad. Plenty of kids need adopting.
>>104224
Spicy bait.
>This is what Trump voters said when asked to compare his inauguration crowd with Obama’s
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/01/25/we-asked-people-which-inauguration-crowd-was-bigger-heres-what-they-said/?utm_term=.7f6707aba2fb
OP here, sorry all I meant to post this on /pol/
>>104460
You are not me.
>>104459
Spoilers:It's confirmation bias
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/12/13/scientists-are-frantically-copying-u-s-climate-data-fearing-it-might-vanish-under-trump/
>Alarmed that decades of crucial climate measurements could vanish under a hostile Trump administration, scientists have begun a feverish attempt to copy reams of government data onto independent servers in hopes of safeguarding it from any political interference.
>The efforts include a “guerrilla archiving” event in Toronto, where experts will copy irreplaceable public data, meetings at the University of Pennsylvania focused on how to download as much federal data as possible in the coming weeks, and a collaboration of scientists and database experts who are compiling an online site to harbor scientific information.
...
https://ischool.utoronto.ca/content/guerrilla-archiving-event-saving-environmental-data-trump
>>91688
>big scary trump is coming to take your spreadsheets away
This liberal hysteria only gets funnier with every incident
>>91688
>libshits
>>91729
As much as I also tire of seeing people on Facebook go full panic mode with everything, in all fairness Trump and his crew do openly deny scientific facts here.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/316233-gop-rep-building-a-wall-most-expensive-and-least-effective-way-to
>Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) is criticizing President Trump's push to build a wall on the border with Mexico.
>“Building a wall is the most expensive and least effective way to secure the border,” Hurd said in a statement late Wednesday, according to The Washington Post.
>“Each section of the border faces unique geographical, cultural, and technological challenges that would be best addressed with a flexible, sector-by-sector approach that empowers the agents on the ground with the resources they need.”
>The president signed an executive order Wednesday on his central campaign promise that directs federal agencies to begin constructing a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
>It was one of two executive orders on border security that Trump signed during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
>Hurd represents a district including miles of the U.S.-Mexico border. He said it is "impossible" to build a wall in some parts of his district.
>“Big Bend National Park and many areas in my district are perfect examples of where a wall is unnecessary and would negatively impact the environment, private property rights and economy,” Hurd said.
>Instead, he promoted an "intelligence-led approach."
>>104301
>“Building a wall is the most expensive and least effective way to secure the border,”
short term, yes
long term, it is by far the most cost-effective solution.
>>104301
I love when the dems and rinos appeal to conservative sentiments.
Next we'll hear that the wall will cause more gay marriage. Those were the days.
>>104333
So where exactly on the Rio Grande do you want the wall to go?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/anonymous-porn-site-naked-women-1.3942831
Bonnie Hannah had no idea there were revealing photos of her posted publicly on the internet until CBC News contacted her for this story. Her nearly nude image is among dozens being traded by strangers.
Anonymous people speculate about her ability in bed. One offered cash to anyone who could snag a photo of her completely naked.
Hannah's personal email address is even posted beneath photos that showcase her cleavage.
Her face blanched when she was told what was posted online.
"Why? Why would they want to do that?" she asked.
"It's not fair. It's not right."
Posting nude images dubbed 'wins'
Hannah is one of dozens of women in the Montreal area whose pictures are posted on this message board, apparently without their consent, for anyone to ogle and download.
In all, 238 images have been posted — some in which the women are naked, some almost naked — over a period of six months.
CBC News is not naming the website to avoid driving up traffic.
The Montreal thread is one of many Canadian threads. Most major cities in Canada — as well as some campuses, including McGill University — have similar message boards, where those who go to the site are encouraged to post pictures of local women.
McGill
A McGill University thread exists to solicit suggestive images of women who attend the institution.
Those posting the photos use their own vocabulary — language that reflects their lack of regard for the women depicted in the photos.
Posting nude images — or "wins," to use the board's nomenclature — is discussed by users as though it's a sport.
In some posts, people ask for photos of specific women the person posting claims to know personally. Others say they'll "dump" their archive of pictures if others do the same.
"Julie I went to school with her," says the writer of one post. "Hoping for a win on her or her friend Tiffany."
Whats the link to Vola?
>>103688
What's the punishment in Canada for stealing nudes of someone and publishing them?
>The image-based bulletin board was launched in 2006, with the goal of anonymously posting leaked or stolen nude images of women. It has been shut down and reopened a number of times since then.
From a criminal law perspective, police have tools at their disposal to track online activity. A 2014 law gives police additional power to investigate cyber intimidation cases.
The law makes it an offence to share nude or sexually explicit images without the subject's consent. Anyone convicted could face five years in prison.
Literal North American Sweden
Keep America Great!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-new-slogan-is-from-the-purge_us_587f928ee4b0cf0ae8810f52
>>103351
Since OP is a giant faggot and expects people to actually click on a huffingtonpost.com link, I'm going to copypaste the article in all its slantted, clickbait glory for him.
>Yes, you have heard the phrase “Keep America Great” before.
>Everyone who thought the Trump campaign was something out of a horror movie, well, you were right.
>In a recent talk with The Washington Post, President-elect Donald Trump halted an interview about the origins of his “Make America Great Again” slogan to trademark a new one. And this one’s a real humdinger.
>From The Washington Post:
>Halfway through his interview with The Washington Post, Trump shared a bit of news: He already has decided on his slogan for a reelection bid in 2020.
>“Are you ready?” he said. “ ‘Keep America Great,’ exclamation point.”
>“Get me my lawyer!” the president-elect shouted.
>Two minutes later, one arrived.
>“Will you trademark and register, if you would, if you like it — I think I like it, right? Do this: ‘Keep America Great,’ with an exclamation point. With and without an exclamation. ‘Keep America Great,’ ” Trump said.
>“Got it,” the lawyer replied.
>“Keep America Great.” It just rolls off the tongue, right? The only problem is, it’s already taken ...
>Yeah, Trump’s new slogan is literally the same exact one used in the fittingly titled horror movie “The Purge: Election Year.”
>(You really can’t make this stuff up.)
>Actually, the movie basically made the slogan as a way to troll Trump. While discussing the film, star Frank Grillo told Comicbook.com:
...
>“In the beginning when we shot the movie it wasn’t called Purge: Election Year,” Grillo reveals. “Oddly enough, the guy who plays the President in the movie, he plays him like Trump - totally by accident. There’s a lot of parallels between the GOP race and the movie and the messages that are being put forward and then Universal got this great idea to call it Purge: Election Year.”
>And now, the president-elect wants to use the slogan from the film as his own
>Sad. Just sad.
>For those unfamiliar with the franchise, “The Purge” movies are about one night a year when all crime is legal. You can murder, steal and even shoot a gun on Fifth Avenue without repercussion. So yeah, that’s not really instilling confidence in the next four years.
>Yeah, we said that.
>Though, you can’t forget that Mr. Trump wanted to add an exclamation to the end of his slogan, which makes it super different.
>Just look:
>“Keep America Great” vs. “Keep America Great!”
>Way more excitement. Way more fantastic.
>Unfortunately, since Trump’s new tagline is technically already taken (by a movie that seemingly pokes fun at him), the president-elect may look elsewhere. For Mr. Trump’s reference, here are some other slogans that have been used before:
>1. “Who will survive and what will be left of them?” from Texas Chainsaw Massacre
>Hmm ... who will survive? Good question. Not this slogan, though. Sorry, ”The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” already called dibs. (Bryanston Pictures)
>2. ”When there’s no more room in Hell, the dead will walk the Earth.”
>The dead will have to just walk somewhere else. America is building a wall and this slogan is on the other side with ”Dawn of the Dead.” (United Film Distribution Company)
God it's so horrible. It just goes on like this. You get the point, no need to continue copypasting. OP you might as well have just posted the original WaPo article.
>Keep America Great
Has to make it great first.