/um/ Flowchart Thread

should i make a byrds flowchart or an rem one, which do y'all prefer?

>>65625781
why would you start with let it be

>>65625807

thought it would be interesting desu. felt a rubber soul or revolver start would be too obvious/expected.

and Byrds definitely, been meaning to get into them

>>65625781
The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as “the greatest or most significant or most influential” rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.

>>65625826

thanks for the copypasta senpai

>>65625781
This is true worst fucking flowchart I've seen in my life. Also why make a flowchart for the only band that is literally full-discography essential for cultural literacy (contrarianism aside, you can't just choose to not know the catalog)

>>65625898

"my music taste is superior compared to yours" get a fuckin life senpai

>>65625963
I didn't say anything like that, did I? I just said the flowchart is incoherent and unnecessary

File: radiohead flowchart.png (590KB, 1747x2994px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 1747x2994px

>>65625781

>>65626067

too bad turn blue was an absolute piece of shit.

>>65626069
Very helpful, thanks anon!

>>65625820
fair enough, i just didn't like let it be that much, so if i'd started there i'm not sure i'd have listened to something else by the beatles

i'm too tired today but if this thread survives until tomorrow i'll post it
if it doesn't survive i'll post it in the next flowchart thread

>>65626039
literally me tbqh

>>65625870
No problem always happy to effectively contribute to threads

>>65625781
>starting with let it be
are you fucking retarded?

>>65625781
this's definitely a joke. this is like an anti flowchart