>reverse lunga edition Post the tracks you're workin

File: lunga2morebeers.jpg (232KB, 885x886px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 885x886px

>>53384864
We're making an album! (or trying to).
How to join:
>Take a good look at this picture
>Be inspired by it
>that's it
Anything goes, feel free to find anons to collab and have fun with in any way you want. Or just work solo.
We're doing this for fun.

File: noteeyes.jpg (3KB, 120x117px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 120x117px

first for starting off a /prod/ thread the RIGHT way

First for Dave Smith fucking your mum

reposting because i'm insecure

https://clyp.it/kt5ggvmh

File: sorrydave.png (18KB, 313x230px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 313x230px

>>53384921
>didnt get first
not this time

>>53384940
10/10 would pay money for

>ambient techno?

https://clyp.it/abz2uu4x

WIP

Any of you guys use Bitwig Studio? I've been hearing good stuff from its users.

>>53385168
it's the exact same thing as ableton that's why

>>53385247

minus track grouping (lel) and it has loljava under the hood (LOL)

>>53385268
>minus track grouping
oh wow lol, no wonder nobody seems to really care about bitwig

I've recently discovered the wonders of rutracker, what software should I not buy?

https://clyp.it/3dgygrx1
I'm pretty confident in the chord progression and overall vibe, but I have no idea how to arrange electronic music like this. Any tips to stretch this out into a full song?

>>53385268
>loljava
Pls go with your /g/ memes
>>53385168
It'll be better than Ableton once they reach feature parity, in my opinion

>>53385877
This is pretty nice, maybe a little to mud range, just a very tiny bit. Might be just me. As far as stretching it out, just try to write another part. Or maybe take a single layer of that part and write something different over it in the same key.

>>53385877
>https://clyp.it/3dgygrx1
put some more high end freq in it. it'd make it sound more "there" ya know? i feel like its to distant.

>>53385679
All of it.

>>53385042
Is this the ultimate compliment?

>>53385963
>>53385965
Nah there's definitely mud, I haven't bothered with mixing it at all yet. Do you think adding high end would make it stand up stronger? because right now I feel like anything past a minute and a half is repetitive, but maybe more presence would make it more compelling.

>>53386097
your clyp > subtract layers (drop) > clyp+new track with high end making it sound like a dif part.

>>53384940
Give it a couple of quiet layers to fill it out, increase the lengths of the plucks a little, give the drums some meat, and you've got something good. This is the part where a field recorder and some ambient samples would be helpful.

>>53384916
music theory is for prissy know it all collegegirl FAGS

File: 3.jpg (84KB, 600x399px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 600x399px

https://clyp.it/hozdkcwa

Bumo

>>53386244
hey do YOU know how to spell a G minor seventh chord?! HAH! checkmate!

>>53386546
yeah i might
lets see
here goes nothing
G M I N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
M I N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
I N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
N O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
O R S E V E N T H C H O R D
R S E V E N T H C H O R D
S E V E N T H C H O R D
E V E N T H C H O R D
V E N T H C H O R D
E N T H C H O R D
N T H C H O R D
T H C H O R D
H C H O R D
C H O R D
H O R D
O R D
R D
D
how did i do

>>53386546
good post. music thoery is important

>>53386611
looks like this man is qualified to review music here

>>53386631
what's music theory got to do with reviewing music?

>>53386211
what should I do about quiet layers is there a popular thing to do? are these things that should be at all audible or just like pseudo filler? Or could I just add something like another tape hiss..

>>53386661
shut the fuck up

>>53386488
bump

>>53386822
whoa and now it looks as if it's really you who's the one who is qualified to review music

>>53386863
whats being an assertive, opinionated douchebag got to do with reviewing music?

Any tips for this mix?

https://clyp.it/kyl5u44a

>>53386855
>>53386488
>https://clyp.it/hozdkcwa
i listened to this the first time you posted it. not as distorted but could definitely lay off the distortion a little more. make it a tad more clear and really love that drop :37. keep it up dude

>>53386888
mostly everything nowadays

keking because why are you talking about reviewing music in a production thread. im sure there's the nightly p4k is still in session

>>53386888
>assertive, opinionated douchebag
that's the basic qualifications for being a critique

>>53386945
sasauge fatten or boost some of your weaker values. overall good song but the sound is a little flat

>>53387098
cool. thanks man. im just trying to get a few more people to hear it before i change it too much. i think maybe theres a market around this kind of sound? no idea but i love making it.

File: 25111be0ee[1].png (9KB, 122x191px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 122x191px

>>53387221
That's the scary part man, I already did this to the master.

>>53387337
k did u individually eq any of the sounds that should stand out?

File: you.jpg (100KB, 402x427px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 402x427px

>>53385950
do you honestly think that running on the jvm isn't going to introduce latency and other issues?

man..when i make a track 90% of the time i'm just listening to it on repeat while i cruise the internet. like i make one part and spend a day listening to it then next day add a little more and spend the rest of the day listening to it; rinse and repeat. i never finish a track cause i get tired of hearing it after a week. it's a bitch tryna work myself to actually work on a song all day rather then just making on synth and melody and calling it a day. anyone else have this problem?

>>53387419
every track has an eq thrown on either to eliminate lows, boost them, or raise the high end

>>53387476
incredible. maybe its your rendering?