Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 5402. page

File: topsters2 (5).jpg (991KB, 1960x3416px) Image search: [Google]

991KB, 1960x3416px

>>72119681
sounds very intimate and nice, try maybe Nicole Dollanganger, Natural Snow Buildings

>>72119759
pretty nice, try Penfold, Chokebore, A Minor Forest, Noir Désir

File: IMG_0583.png (1MB, 1440x2592px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2592px

Recommendations?

>>72119615
mid & late....because early was atrocious

pre-9/11 early 00s > mid 00s >>>>>>>>>>>> early 00s > late 00s

>>72119769
So completely wrong.

Late >>> mid >>>>>>>> early

he dindu nuffin

>>72119556
good thread

French Canada needs to be banned from the internet, alongside Australia.

>>72119520
that, and stuff like early november, title fight, childish gambino, chance, and chvrches. middle school wasn't too long ago for me.

>>72119520
I listened to a lot of Slipknot and Mudvayne when I was little. I thought Nu Metal was the best thing ever

File: 1448200137102.jpg (67KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 960x720px

Black Metal and Video Game OST's

I was very popular.

File: 1490260709383s.jpg (1KB, 125x83px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 125x83px

https://soundcloud.com/111h111/tracks

https://111h111.bandcamp.com/album/beats

>chill
>beats
>ambient

File: cover1.jpg (378KB, 1400x1400px) Image search: [Google]

378KB, 1400x1400px

>soundcloud

https://soundcloud.com/90sneptune

>bandcamp
https://90sneptune.bandcamp.com/

fuck i forgot my youtube, i almost forgot i made one

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pwiv9DqxehI

>>72119460
uh oh it's that time of day again...how long before you post that evanesence pic?

File: 31289132831281328.jpg (8KB, 273x185px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 273x185px

>>72119460
HELLO HELLO HELLO HOW LOW
HELLO HELLO HELLO HOW LOW
HELLO HELLO HELLO HOW LOW

>>72119460
death metal

Don't have one.

File: 1480764460154.jpg (10KB, 351x351px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 351x351px

>>72119291
>earl sweatshirt
>never wears a sweatshirt

Actually same wow, this is my fav album ever

What is it?

File: 0e3.gif (510KB, 480x266px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 480x266px

>>72119289
it's fire. my aoty so far

File: mz08o8vwZG1rt5fkyo1_250.gif (999KB, 250x197px) Image search: [Google]

999KB, 250x197px

>>72119304
Can you read?
>>72119319
Honestly, didn't think he could top his last full length, but this just so damn epic.
Also perfect balance of pretty techno/ambient tracks and straight up stompers

>>72119275
nice thread

File: E_Sesame_Street_Julia_04112017-1-1.jpg (100KB, 354x338px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 354x338px

>>72119275

File: E_Sesame_Street_Julia_04112017-1-2.jpg (91KB, 355x338px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 355x338px

>>72119363

>>72119089
you probably just use apple's earbuds

>>72119089
Buy better headphones or sound system, don't judge your ears bro

>>72119089
It's 128 kbps VBR (which means it's much better than the regular 128 CBR) and it's AAC (better than mp3 at the same bitrate). It sounds about the same as an mp3 at 192 kbps CBR. Btw, check this:
https://blog.codinghorror.com/the-great-mp3-bitrate-experiment/
https://blog.codinghorror.com/concluding-the-great-mp3-bitrate-experiment/

>But what about the claim that people with dog ears can hear the difference between the higher bitrate MP3 samples? Well, first off, it's incredibly strange that the first sample – encoded at a mere 160kbps – does better on average than everything else. I think it's got to be bias from appearing first in the list of audio samples. It's kind of an outlier here for no good reason, so we have to almost throw it out. More fuel for the argument that people can't hear a difference at bitrates above 128kbps, and even if they do, they're probably imagining it. If we didn't throw out this result, we'd have to conclude that the 160kbps sample was somehow superior to the raw CD audio, which is … clearly insane.

>Anyway, between the anomalous 160kbps result and the blink-and-you'll-miss-it statistical difference between the 192kbps result and the raw CD audio, I'm comfortable calling this one as I originally saw it. The data from this experiment confirms what I thought all along: for pure listening, the LAME defaults of 192kbps variable bit rate encoding do indeed provide a safe, optimal aural bang for the byte – even dogs won't be able to hear the difference between 192kbps VBR MP3 tracks and the original CD.

yeah, it's literal dogshit

>>72118973
rapping is talking over a rhythm...that's all
I know you know this...but a lot of you don't know this.

It's a sub genre of hip hop and mumble rap is a sub genre of rap. You can't compare new school to old school because it's not the same at all.

File: ;_;.png (2MB, 2112x1188px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2112x1188px

>>72118764
that's a strange way of spelling run away with me

>>72118764
Sorry but Art Angels is the real AOTY 2015.

/thread

I was in 2015

File: 17663314_215444768940854_670553590154133504_n.jpg (195KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1080x1080px

peekaboo

>>72118691
depeche mode for dummies

>>72118704
nice meme

>>72118715
call it a meme if you want, it's a blatant rip off, trash album

>>72118503
No I cannot
What you are saying is correct

it isn't accurate

no way you cant tell me that bro i cant even for real right now you're all fuck bro