File: 1501308720198.gif (490KB, 350x264px) Image search:
[Google]
490KB, 350x264px
Post looping gifs and a song that goes with it. If you have no gifs then post music that you think would go better with gifs other people have posted.
You have to skip about 1 min into this song for this one.
https://youtu.be/hArkTJLjbUk?t=1m
10 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1468541568673.gif (335KB, 340x255px) Image search:
[Google]
335KB, 340x255px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1NAhlVRaZ4
>>
File: 1316509440239.gif (368KB, 380x298px) Image search:
[Google]
368KB, 380x298px
https://youtu.be/h9nE2spOw_o
>>
File: 1463069838927.gif (826KB, 500x375px) Image search:
[Google]
826KB, 500x375px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4fa44_sq2E
File: Resized_Edifier R1280T.png (1MB, 1000x666px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1000x666px
The /mu/ wiki has a bunch of guides on headphones, but not a word on speakers (nor on playback hardware that isn't a turntable).
Now, I have a PC with on-board audio and a very cheap set of Creative desk speakers. I was hoping you could advise me on:
- A sound card:
--PCI, or
--USB
(Keep in mind I want to use my headphones with it too, but that shouldn't be a problem.)
-Speakers:
--type:
---something like pic
---maybe cheap studio monitors?
--amount:
---2.0, or
---2.1?
(No room for more.)
I'm on a budget of ~€150-200 for the whole thing.
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>74232505
ask /prod/
>>
>>74232536
What's /prod/? I figured /mu/ would be the best fit for this question. My second choice would be /g/, since they have a headphone thread up currently.
File: macintosh plus.jpg (49KB, 600x450px) Image search:
[Google]
49KB, 600x450px
Is there anything this woman can't do?
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>she
>>
>>74232501
no one said "she" but nice job anon
>>
>>74232476
Yuck
File: CgldEYQU8AA2MPn.jpg (34KB, 493x585px) Image search:
[Google]
34KB, 493x585px
>drop money on a record
>its fucking colored vinyl
1 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
No replies in the DB for this post!
File: it's everyday bro.jpg (155KB, 1129x635px) Image search:
[Google]
155KB, 1129x635px
What's your favorite live performance of all time?
For me, it's https://youtu.be/flTHBQ3Aq6M
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>74232434
oh america
>>
>>74232434
Corporations ruined the Internet
>>
>>74232491
The dude from England is the meme. Don't blame us.
File: Cheap Trick.jpg (88KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
88KB, 600x600px
Best 70s rock band
3 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 0cb9827d5f9e4479b6ab0ae0da2e06fc.jpg (31KB, 300x300px) Image search:
[Google]
31KB, 300x300px
sorry whatchu say again?
>>
>>74232291
Jones and Bonham look weird in that pic.
Amazing hidden tracks that feel in place with the rest of the album
2 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 723340_orig.jpg (127KB, 640x480px) Image search:
[Google]
127KB, 640x480px
Never forget
File: 51EvJFIsugL.jpg (38KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
38KB, 500x500px
this is the best weezer album
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
queef
>>
>>74232149
true
>>
File: hurley.png (402KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
402KB, 500x500px
op here, i meant to post this pic
sorry for the confusion
File: c215655d5845f75280c1643fc263da2a.800x800x1.jpg (92KB, 800x800px) Image search:
[Google]
92KB, 800x800px
People who say that Linkin Park is shit have never listened to this album in its entirety.
8 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>74232089
probably, because they'd use even worse words to describe the dog shit it is
>>
>>74232089
or maybe, they have!
>>
it was the album that made me stop listening to them but I was fairly young maybe I need to give it a new try
File: Beck-Odelay-640x640.jpg (85KB, 640x640px) Image search:
[Google]
85KB, 640x640px
BEST BECK ALBUM
1 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
No replies in the DB for this post!
File: images (45).jpg (35KB, 383x384px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 383x384px
Why this song it's so perfect?
3 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>deftones
>perfection
choose one
>>
cuz this album has the best deftones sound
File: sampling.png (1MB, 1500x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1500x1500px
what does /mu/ think of sampling?
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Destruction is also a way of creation
>>
>>74231975
i love that pic lol
>>
>>74231975
It's good if you're creative and layer and warp samples to create your own mood and compositions (see Danny brown, Kanye West, DJ shadow, Travis Scott). Simple looping plus a lame percussion equals uninspired. Coming from a producer that knows my shit
File: 11fantaziasummertime-490x332.jpg (48KB, 490x332px) Image search:
[Google]
48KB, 490x332px
London and Berlin
Or
Detroit and Chicago
5 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Ibiza and Magaluf
>>
>>74231959
Chicago > Berlin > London > Detroit
>>
London and Berlin > Detroit and Chicago
Europe > The United States
The United States > Any individual European country (except it's really fucking close with the Great Britain)
Sydney > Any United States city
Australia, United States, and Great Britain are all neck-and-neck
10/10 live albums
6 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 71Kfy6AvujL._SY355_.jpg (43KB, 355x355px) Image search:
[Google]
43KB, 355x355px
>>74231924
>>
File: 220px-Jpunleashedintheeast.jpg (16KB, 220x219px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 220x219px
>>
File: images (47).jpg (26KB, 385x382px) Image search:
[Google]
26KB, 385x382px
>>74231924
I think that In Rainbows is their weakest since Pablo Honey. Of course, I do consider myself a Radiohead fan (yeah, yeah, they’re not particularly original, and I hate everything that the ‘90s stood for musically, but they had certain qualities that I found myself deeply drawn to, which I’ll discuss in the following paragraph), so maybe my perspective is a little different. But on the other hand, everybody else seems to love this thing, so maybe I’m just an anomaly.
With In Rainbows, they seem to be attempting a very bare, minimalist musical approach, with a very relaxed and calm atmosphere. But I don’t think that it works. The two things that I always loved most about Radiohead were their sonic instrumental arrangements, and the emotional resonance that they managed to create through an atmosphere of frantic urgency (a la Exit Music for a Film or Idioteque). Of course this album is far too stripped-down and laid-back to accomplish either of these things. They seem to be working under the assumption that the bare melodies are enough to carry the songs, but I just don’t think that any of the melodies are very strong at all. I find this to be a very weak and underwhelming (not to mention disappointing) musical experience. A low 6/10 for me.
6 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1458632631745.jpg (17KB, 512x480px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 512x480px
I hated this album. I think it's their worst, worse than Pablo Honey even! Sure, that album was generic, but then it was also fun in a dumb-rock way. This album isn't fun, isn't funny, isn't sad, it's not very interesting at all. It seems like this entire album was an afterthought, like an "Aww, do we HAVE TO record an album?" The weird way in which it was quickly released gives more credibility to the fact that Radiohead just don't care anymore. And what's really odd is that I agree with all of your other reviews 100% -- but this album is just... ugh. It's odd, too, almost every website on the internet seems to be glowing with appreciation for this work, yet everyone I know in real life was really disappointed with this album. Because do you honestly think you're going to be spinning this one as much as, say, Hail to the Thief or Kid A? I know I won't. Ugh.
>>
It's so average. It's just like they went back and reheated The Bends and Pablo Honey and chucked some of their token "faux avantgarde" (apparently that means "pretending to be avant garde whilst actually playing mellow pop") in there.
Oh, but I agree that Thom Yorke is an ugly piece of moaning crap. Jeezus Christ, who does he think he is; Jesus Christ?
>>
I like Muse too