[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Extra juicy! | Home]

If authors intent is dead/irrelevant, can I make a romantic love

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 4

File: 1438715612108.png (42KB, 386x269px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1438715612108.png
42KB, 386x269px
If authors intent is dead/irrelevant, can I make a romantic love story out of Mein Kampf?
>>
I don't know about you OP, but I always read mein kampf as a love struggle between a troubled artist, and a nation that refused to love him back
>>
File: images.jpg (4KB, 163x156px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
images.jpg
4KB, 163x156px
>>7327185
>>
Is it possible in principle to pull a Pierre Menard and perfectly reproduce the text of Mein Kampf word-for-word, but with the intent of writing a love story? If yes, the answer is yes.
>>
>>7327185
Which nation? German loved him.
>>
>>7327273

Not on their first date. Bavaria rejected him when he tried his first Putsch in 1923.
>>
File: shit son.jpg (7KB, 250x253px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
shit son.jpg
7KB, 250x253px
>>7327279
>>7327185

> mfw reading this shit
>>
> taking post-modernist and post-structuralist bullshit serious

This isn't 1970 anymore
>>
>>7328124
>implying intentional fallacy and death of the author didn't predate pomo and post-struct by decades

senpai onegai
>>
>>7328127

Yeah, and burning jews in ovens predated the Holocaust, but that doesn't imply that it was the Nazis who perfected it.
>>
>>7328138
>it wasn't*
>>
File: 1414001887428.gif (2MB, 394x394px) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1414001887428.gif
2MB, 394x394px
>>7327279
>>7327273
>>7327185
>>
I find this thread both mildly disturbing and arousing
>>
>>7328138
Kekd
>>
>>7327161
10/10, would read
>>
> 2015
> still believing in author's intent
>>
>>7328830
>2015
>still believing in intentional fallacy
>still believing in death of the author

ghost of barthes pls go
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 4


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.