What are some Great Books by SJW authors? What books should

SJWism is just Plato's Republic, but instead of philosopher kings, it's led by the oppressed

Pynchon still is alive, you idiot

>>7325342
>tfw Pynchon will die someday and we might not know for months

>>7325342
Is Pynchon sjw? We don't known much he doesn't even have a twitter. Is "Thomas Pynchon" even a real person? Maybe. But taking in mind Postmodernism is SJW, so 'he' Could be actully a committee of transgenders collectively churning out cultural Marxist agitprop under inconspicuous white male pseudonym.

I'm tempted to say Invisible Man, but half of that book is about large social justice movements not being able to recognize an individual.

Richard Wright better captures the modern notion of an SJW, but it does NOT hold up, apart from some of his poetry.

File: 1438791950268.jpg (53KB, 505x604px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 505x604px

>>7325362
>tfw Pynchon will die.

SJWs were made up by internet reactionaries who were too lazy to understand contemporary philosophy, and too scared to think critically of their own behaviour

>>7325381
His early stuff is good.

>>7325320
dumb frog poster

>>7325430
kek, for some reason it wouldn't surprise me if you actually believe that was true.

>>7325430
>contemporary philosophy
More like contemporary ideology. What's the point of debating with people who make unverifiable claims, especially with a 'holier than thou' attitude? When SJW theory has been proven wrong time and time again we are constantly reminded that these discrepancies are just a distraction from the main issue, yet they never actually explain what that 'main issue' is. Wholly anti-intellectual and quite honestly offensive to everybody who even dares to go against the norm.

>>7325473
T/b!-h it wouldn't surprise me if you turned out to be an internet reactionary who's too lazy to understand modern philosophy or think critically about his problematic behaviors

>>7325504
I'm not a reactionary at all. I'm actually a very conservative liberal.