is this heidegger in a nutshell? http://www.atimes.com/atime

>>7325009
incredibly better
being cryptic in matters of knowledge is for faggots, it serves no purpose

>>7325009
>>"What be 'Be'? You cain't say that 'Be' be, cause you saying 'be' to talk about 'Be', and it don't mean nothing to say that 'Be' be dis or 'Be' be dat. 'Be' be 'Be' to begin wit'. So don't you be saying 'Be' be 'Be'. You wanna talk about 'Be', you gotta talk about what ain't be nothin' at all. You gotta say 'Be' be what ain't 'ain't-Be'. Now when you ain't be nothing at all? Dat be when you be daid. When you daid you ain't be nothing, you just be daid. So 'Be' be somewhere between where you be and where you ain't be, dat is, when you be daid. Any time you say 'Be' you is also saying 'ain't-Be', and dat make you think about being daid."
HAHAHAHAH, this is hilarious. ;_;

>>7325085
They're only being "cryptic" because language makes the matter difficult to communicate effectively, they in doing so are actually only trying to make their point as clear as possible, ironic in a way.

>>7325085
Heidegger wasn't just trying to be cryptic.

This anon is right >>7325096 and also Heidegger is full of chuckles if you read him in German. He's a punny guy, especially in his lectures.

>>7325009
I think I get it now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u51fdqvcs5A

>>7325123
>German humor

hilarious article
his understanding of Strauss is at least half true

>>7325085
he isn't being cryptic his thought is pushing the limits of language, something you wouldn't know about except when you get excited at the mcdonalds drive thru and order multiple value meals simultaneously. Numb-b-nubm 334 4 quarter pounder bIGMAcc icihcken fries

>>7325211
>Numb-b-nubm 334 4 quarter pounder bIGMAcc icihcken fries
10/10 lol.

>>7325211
>trying to define a word is pushing the limits of language

>>7325294
>Trying to define a concept
FTFY