Who else here /free/? How does it feel knowing that any problem

>>7220692

sounds like an explicit kind of willing slavery

Sounds pretty gay lol

>>7220697

>freedom is slavery

Anyway, I'm more into Nietzsche, but Stirner also seems like an okay guy

>you can think yourself to freedom

And this is why Marx will always be better than Stirner

>>7220697
You've said nothing

>>7220704
Tell us how to be 'free' mad marx

>>7220711
Lordship and bondage arise from material conditions. When our productive abilities advance enough to make these social relations obsolete, we can revolt and introduce a new social order without the wage slavery the working class experience.

>>7220724
What if someone says they don't care about the order? Why should it be everyone's cause?

>>7220724
>>Lordship and bondage arise from material conditions
no, Lordship and bondage arise from personal desire to always ease the personal life which leads to a desire of gain.

>>7220734
It isn't everyone's cause. The working class are the ones who lack freedom and always will as long as there is a distinction between them and the class which employs them. They are the ones who need to overthrow the existing order. The bourgeoisie benefit from this existing order.

>>7220742
>human relations come from thinking

You all really need to read the German ideology

>Lordship and bondage arise

Is enough of an argument against OP's alleged freedom

Neither slave or master are free from the condition of their bondage

>>7220734
just because you don't care about the order, that doesn't mean the order isn't imposed on you. You can't just start having money because you don't care that you haven't the means to attain it.

File: fox grapes.png (112KB, 688x1434px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 688x1434px

>>7220697
Good God the slave morality in this post.