How does one read "correctly"?
http://www.cosmoetica.com/TOP.htm
With interest.
Break it up into syllables: cor-rect-ly
Who was in the wrong here?
The autistic, sick, fucked up kid
Which means its the parent's fault
>>9648940
He was actually right in giving the sailor an Honorfull death
there isn't a right or wrong in this story or in life
>“Look, some people prefer they,’ Alex said. ‘They’re non-binary or mid-spectrum or whatever. If they want you to use they, then that’s what you should do. But for me, personally, I don’t want to use the same pronouns all the time, because that’s not me. I change a lot. That’s sort of the point. When I’m she, I’m she. When I’m he, I’m he. I’m not they. Get it?’
>‘If I say no, will you hurt me?’
>‘No.’
>‘Then no, not really.’”
Nice meme /lit/
Riordan used to be kid kino.
He should've stopped at The Last Olympian orThe Lightning Thief
What am I in for?
>>9648292
difficulty. have you read Limited Inc? start there with Derrida. it's much more concise and programmatic.
>>9648292
Read Emile.
>>9648292
Difficulty indeed. Also, depending on your age, don't let it influence your writing too much.
Ingrid Salazar, is a 20-year-old girl who wakes up in an empty room and an alone door. Every day remembered his days with his mother while they were walking along the park … it was happening also when some it presents of white they were making it return to sleep. In some dreams it saw beings who did not seem of this world, which they were saying to him that he was in a "bad" place and that they her would help to escape if it uses his "skill"; she forgets almost everything the dialog on having woken up of the quiet forced by these personitas of white.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZMPcP5dKb0
Damn
I want to learn more about moral virtue/ethics.
what are some good introduction books and foundation material? textbooks included.
Beyond Good and Evil
>>9647913
>recommending video games
/lit/ is lost at this point
>>9647912
Old stuff like Aristote may seem far away, but start with that, Nichomacian Ethics is a must. Then find Ethics of Aquinas and move onto contemporary/modern authors, G. E. M. Amscombe, Alsadair MacIntyre, Philipa Foot, David Oderberg are your go to authors.
Happy belated Bloomsday, /lit/
who?
Who was right?
Raskolnikov
Pauly Marivelli
/pol/ (always)
Should I get into Peter Sloterdijik? Can anyone intro me to his philosophy and style?
>>9647777
Depends on what you want, Sloterdijk wrote quite a bit and a fair amount of it is translated. "Rage and Time" for example is decent even if you're not conservative and a rather easy read.
Princeton's website for Dante (Hollander translation) is currently offline and I'd really like to read the 4 final cantos of Paradiso.
Anybody got access to a pdf or a text willing to share?
>>9647638
I have the physical book, but it's the Mandelbaum translation.
we should all take criticisms compliments and advice like any other gentle breeze. we accept and acknowledge the ones we appreciate and move out of the way or push through the ones we don't care for. but we don't do we.? we take every gust of wind that blows in our direction as a slap in the face. For a species bred from cavemen we've become a pretty and fairly fragile lot... oh I'm sorry.. did I say cavemen? I meant bred by gods. And why would the sons of god take the words of man as an offense? Why should demi gods, high as we are on our thrones of piety, take any offense whatsoever? and yet, religious types, son of Suns, are the touchiest sorts of people. Consider the wars and deaths and tragedies done in jealousy or to prove that one mans god is more real then another. If a man came to you in the broad light of day and told you the sun didn't exist, you might laugh in his face. You wouldn't start a war to prove him wrong. Unless you were the man who claimed the sun didn't exist. all those people telling you
"it is real," and
"It does exist!" laughing in your face, pointing to that big bright light in the sky you just cant explain. you would probably try and gather just enough people who didn't believe in the sun to start a really good bar fight.
And holy shit, wouldn't ya know it. theres about a million other dumb motherfuckers who don't believe the sun exist either. you would be the captain of your own army.
and a little while after the "right now" you didn't know could have happened a couple seconds ago, if you wait just a few milliseconds before the "now" you didn't know was gonna happen right now, "it" would happen. you would be internet famous. you've got your own cult following. youre the new cathutlu. whom the fuck is cathulu? who gives a fuck? fuck em. the sun is a meme. a billion year lie. What now? or, you know. Ahora que? I'm assuming Spanish is the new english.
ITT: We bash ANALytic (((philosophy))). Wittgenstein is off limits
>>9647470
what the fuck do I need to read to understand her, /lit/?
hell, I'll settle for not being totally lost.
>>9649634
Funnily enough, her translation of Sappho is shit
Does /lit/ project ( docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1 ) cover aesthetics well enough or at all? Are there reading lists I can supplement with that link, memes or links
>>9647015
Did you mention marxists.org for finding books and resources?
>>9647039
Are you going to actually contribute something
>>9647015
for aesthetics I`d recommend
(cronologically)
>Baumgarten - Aesthetica
>Lessing - Laocoön and the limits of painting and poetry
>Kant - critique of judgement
>Schiller - Letters on Aethetics
>Schelling - Characteristics of the work of art
>Hegel- Lectures on Aesthetics
>Heidegger - The Origin of the work of art
>Lukacs - the soul and the form/Art and class consciousness
>Benjamin - the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction/(the origins of the german tragedy/essay on the work of art/essay on the mimetic capabilities)
>Adorno - Aesthetic theory
>Satre - what is literature?