Finally! Release date in sight and just preordered my copy. It took long enough.
Fuck you
>>9757860
fpbp
Is this the last one?
Do any of you listen to music while engaged in one of those 2. If so what do you listen to?
>>9757782
Yeah but not classical because classical demands full attention to be appreciated and certainly demands more respect than being treated as background music.
>>9757782
>Klaus Schulze
>Brian Eno
>Steve Roach
>>9757793
shut up retard
ITT: middlebrow writers
how desperate are you for attention?
how desperate are you for attention?
how desperate are you for attention?
Is there any literature that gives you a similar comfy feeling that you get from watching slice of life/romance anime?
>>9757764
no, I'm specifically asking for literature.
>>9757749
yes, slice of life children's books
Well I'll be fucking damned. This guy actually reads Nietzsche the same way I do. I thought he was just a meme, but he seems to have his shit together much better than /lit/.
>reading Nietzsche
>not living it
>>9757589
>dat profound gaze
>dat amor fati
>dat aphoristic determinism
>dat authenticity
Peterson would be raped cucked by rape nigga no question
>>9757586
If one is still Peterson after reading Nietzsche, 45 minutes on one paragraph is a waste of time.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bZWVp_qrD8o
>Harold Bloom ain't got SHIT on me
What did he mean by this?
Harold Bloom is the Scaruffi of /lit/ whereas this guy is the Fantano.
>>9757540
OP here. Real question. What is the deal with everyone in Dostoyevsky's books getting brain fever?
>>9757540
fuck off
Is it acceptable to read poetry in languages that you don't understand? I read through The Divine Comedy; had no idea what was going on, but it was obviously pretty good.
>>9757442
It's fine. You wont get the full experience as the poet intended, but you can glimpse enough aspects of it's greatness through a proper translation. Point in question; my Homer is Lombardo and I prefer his swift style of delivery over Lattimore's faithful adherence to the Greek.
It really depends on the poem, though. For Dante, I'd like to focus on his philosophical aspects, for which reason I prefer the accuracy of Longfellow.
>>9757442
I looked at a facsimile of one of the oldest daodejing scrolls the other day and felt elevated
>>9757514
I meant to ask whether or not it is acceptable to read untranslated poetry that is written in a language one cannot understand.
Do any of you just collect books and never get around to reading them? I readily buy books but don't read all of them, I just like looking at them.
Am I weird? I still read some of them, but I have like 100 books that I haven't read.
pic related, Arcadian Books in the French Quarter, where I get all my books, he's got some old and classic books
At least half of the population of hobbyists don't read/watch/listen to the media they collect.
>>9757408
100 unread books is not bad if you have many more that are read. If your collection is all read books you're doing it wrong. Any reader is afraid of not having a reserve on hand.
My pride myself on my every growing library. Although I haven't read every book on my shelves, it's comforting to know that at any point I can pick from my collection of my own personal backlog.
Were Transcendentalists basically hippies a hundred something years before hippies?
>>9757402
Transcendentalism is just transcendentalism.
Bohemianism is just bohemianism.
Dada is dadA (unless it's Da-Da)
Hippies where just the baby-boomers coming of age and not doing much at all with their potential.
Menand's book on them is good.
>>9757454
I'm new here but I really hope you're not a regular. You seem awful.
>>9757475
Hark, a wild baby-boomer appears.
I mean does Menand claim they are basically hippies?
Who are some good anti-egalitarian writers/thinkers?
Judging by your picture, are you sure you aren't looking for anti-relativist writers ?
>>9757407
Nietzsche was a moral relativist, so no.
Not him.
Try
>Sam Johnson
>Hal Mencken
>Tom Carlyle
>Jack Randolph
>Ed Poe
>Ed Burke
what the fuck was this guys problem?
What stands in the way of Liberté, Equalité, Fraternité? The fulfillment of the promise?
Turns out it was capitalism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wkO3qsZY_U&list=PL80E7B20E05FD7651
>>9757212
I'm sick of "wtf was his problem" threads. People who post threads like that want others to do all the work for them, they never explain why they think someone has a problem.
Oh, and it's Karl Marx. A person that you know 99% of /lit/ hates.
So your post is really unoriginal and low-effort and should never post a thread like this again.
>>9757236
No it was the pipe strip
https://youtu.be/NAh9oLs67Cw
Help me /lit/
I just bought these four books. What order should I read them in?
If you don't read them counterclockwise, starting from bottom right, something bad will happen in your sleep
It doesn't matter. Please stop making these kind of threads.
>>9757173
As You Like It
I really like the idea of debunking spooks but a whole philosophy dedicated to self interest- thats not my thing at all. I mean the world would be a shitty place if we werent benevolent and stuff. I like doing selfless stuff sometimes. It's obvious from reading the Wikipedia article that sterno was Pro capitalist, how do you guys on the left deal with that?
>>9757108
Stirner realized that his spook for debunking spooks was a spook itself. Mankind would be better off without spooks, but yet spooks are essential to our fundamental being.
>>9757108
Just read the book, kid.
He's about as "pro capitalist" as anyone living in this world. Yeah, he tried to start a business, so what? He was also hounded for the rest of his life by debt collectors and died in impoverished filth. The perfectly valid truth of his philosophy can be applied to capitalism.
No The "ego" isn't a spook. That's not what the German word means. Unless you're some kind of solipsist.
lol
>>9757076
Fall
Patiently waiting for Mcelroy to die so we can finally get that 3rd printing. he's 86, so fingers crossed.
From the goodreads group '"I received an update from Dzanc today. Be assured, the book is still in the works. Joe has been editing this thing with the aim to make it "a version of this book that he can pick up and not find a single mistake in". There is at least one more process of working in his corrections and returning it to him for further possible corrections. Basically, Dzanc is doing the edition that Joe himself will be as pleased with as possible.
As to the cover art, it is a painting by his wife and he "feels it captures the book perfectly".
Dzanc does understand the frustrations expressed in this group with the constant delay. It's their frustration too. But again, they are committed to producing an edition that Joe is happy with. I think that's some pretty cool stuff from a publisher.
We don't have a firm release date yet, but I think it's reasonable to expect it by the year's end. If anyone's got any other question, please do let me know. I'll pass them on to Dzanc. Perhaps I should've inquired sooner with them, but basically what they've told me has been my understanding--it's taking some time and it's going to be done to Joe's own standards. [but not to Nick's standard of calf-bound hd ; but at least there'll be a print edition.]"' so yes, we won't see a third print til Mcelroy's dead.
From "Under the Dome"
>The chuck realized he had been spotted. To his right and just ahead was a fallen birch. He would hide under there, wait for the man to go by, then investigate for any tasty —
>The chuck got that far in his thoughts — and another three waddling steps — although he had been cut in two. Then he fell apart on the edge of the road. Blood squirted and pumped; guts tumbled into the dirt; his rear legs kicked rapidly twice, then stopped.
>His last thought before the darkness that comes to us all, chucks and humans alike: What happened?
This honestly terrifies the shit out of me. That the very last thing we will think before we die is "what happened"? We often think of our deaths as being meaningful and that act as a "close" on our lives, but one of my biggest fears is that my last thoughts right before death will be "wait wha-?" and thats it.
>>9757050
that's why you must prepare for death in advance
as in, all the time, starting right now
>>9757719
holy shit thank you
>>9757050
Harold Lauder's last scene in The Stand did this for me
(although that actually plays into a grand narrative so it's a less good example)