>reading on public transport
Is there anything more disgusting than this? How can you immerse yourself n what you're reading when you're surrounded by smelly, noisy retards and the sound of "VROOM VROOM" ?
>>9798558
>the sound of "VROOM VROOM" ?
Trains aren't VROOM VROOM though
Looks like we got ourselves a reader!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwkdGr9JYmE
>>9798558
By not having ADHD you spastic retard. Reading is how I deal with being surrounded by noise and shit. If you don't have the ability to shut out the world and focus completely on what you're reading then you've never really read anything seriously before in your entire life.
How long do I have to shill HD until you guys recognize her genius?
She does too little.
>>9798385
You cheeky cunt, don't think your pun went unnoticed...!
>>9798364
I'd rather shill Akhmatova desu
>learning from others
or
>experiencing things and forming your own thoughts
I don't know which is better. Are you "tainted" or "lazy" if you read books? Aren't you better off by forming your own opinions on things instead of reading the opinion of someone else and regurgitating it?
This is something that has been bugging me. I want to go to university, but it feels like a path of comfortable mediocrity and not going the other way of forming your own thoughts and writing them down. I don't think you get multiple chances at stuff like this.
Think about it like this:
I'm 22. People typically reach their intellectual zenith at around 25 +- 2 years before very very slowly declining for the next several decades until they eventually start getting major problems in old age. Whatever you're going to do, the best of it will statistically be in your mid-twenties. This goes for scientists, painters, mathematicians, musicians and producers, athletes, whatever. Typically, your most CELEBRATED work in life, will have been accomplished around your mid-twenties.
>>9798313
cont.
Something that I've noticed is that people who I find exceptionally intelligent or clever, or whatever you want to use to describe how noticeably sharper they are than everyone else you see every day, have the following qualities across the board, every time, no matter what, no question..
1. They read books and have for most of their lives, making them well-read and cultured - they know what they're talking about and don't bullshit anything
2. They are strikingly articulate when forming arguments, partially by using "big words" fluently that most people don't even know the definition of
3. If they attend(ed) university, they don't pay much attention to the work and instead focus on their own thoughts and projects outside of class for their own purposes
4. They are eccentric enough to be noticeable(aspergers, etc), but normal enough to function in society.. i.e. live on their own, have a job, what have you...
5. They only have original thoughts, and never regurgitate anything.
What i'm describing, I very, very rarely if ever see go to university and use it as some kind of path to higher learning... or act like it means anything. I don't know how to explain it. They take everything into their own hands. They form their own opinions ALWAYS, and very rarely give a shit what other people think on any subject.
I don't see THESE people working hard on their term papers and sweating to get a 4.0 because they JUST HAVE to get into law school, or whatever, you get the point. These people don't listen to professors, or give a shit about what their peers think AT ALL. It's like they're incapable almost, or think it's 100% a waste of their time.
They form their own path. These qualities just don't fit the mold of university, do they? Am I wrong? Regular people do not act like this, and they go to university because "it's what you're supposed to do". I think it is a positive correlation.
Here's the thing, OP: reading books and having your "own original thoughts" are not mutually exclusive. The only way to learn to think for yourself is by apprenticing yourself to someone way smarter than you; ie, by reading the great books of the past. You have to get your ass kicked by someone way smarter than you. Since the professoriate in this country has entirely abdicated that responsibility, you might have to do it on your own by reading.
You don't become an original thinker by sitting alone in a room and having deep thoughts all by your self. In fact, NOT reading is a surefire way to become a parrot of someone else's opinion.
TL;DR: You have it backwards. Reading is what prevents you from becoming tainted by pop culture and NY Times op-eds.
Addendum: Find a tradition and apprentice yourself to it. This is the only way to be original.
What should I read to learn about Ethical Intuitionism?
>Ethical intuitionism (also called moral intuitionism) is a family of views in moral epistemology (and, on some definitions, metaphysics). At minimum, ethical intuitionism is the thesis that our intuitive awareness of value, or intuitive knowledge of evaluative facts, forms the foundation of our ethical knowledge.
>Reasons in support of moral intuitionism:
>Any well-meaning person seems to have an immediate sense of right and wrong
>Human beings had moral ideas and convictions long before a system of ethics was created
Start with the Greeks.
>>9800782
Cool, what’s next?
One last bump
How did this sell >1 million copies?
>>9798152
the intersectional oppression of women, their status as victim of the first world. rupi reinforces this status.
/thread
That's not a bad poem at all.
women is a trip
Post your bookshelf and then other anons, based on the novels you own and your taste, recommend authors missing from your collection that you'd likely enjoy.
>>9798127
Based on your shelf and your humor, I recommend John Green.
>>9798137
Based on your thread and your pic, I recommend reddit.
What languages are you learning, /lit/? How is your progress? What is your strategy.
I think I may have finally broken through on Russian. After about 3 weeks of doing Duolingo and reading childrens' books intensively (6+ hours a day), I can more or less slowly read the Russian version of 4chan. I focused my study more on reading than on writing or listening, so I cannot quite shitpost yet, but I can understand them. There is an odd feeling of 'intelligence' that one feel upon finally understanding idiocy in another language.
I also have middling reading ability in Ancient Greek but material available is less conducive to rapid progress than for a living language.
What the fuck kind of life do you have where you can do Duolingo and read kids books for 6+ hours a day?
>>9797780
Lately I haven't tryed to learn any language.
Months ago I tryed german with Duolingo. I was going okay even, but lazyness cought me and now I am suffering with plebian talk of:
Portuguese [Native/Native]
English [Accented/Accented]
Spanish [Broken/One-Way]
I wish I could get the strenght to start learning russian or japanese.
>>9797895
Vocaroo you speaking English
How do I start with Lovecraft?
>>9797468
You read one of his stories.
>>9797468
Read his story's while bathing in blood.
Oh yeah, I suggest you start will Call of Cthulhu first, at least, it was this one who got me into Lovecraft.
>>9797468
Here: >>9797438
Where to start with Carl Schmitt?
From the first page.
>>9797563
ok thanks
Concept of the Political. Just don't expect any actual explicit Nazism or Fascism.
You should refresh up on your Hobbes, Kant, and Rousseau before you start too, it helps.
what the fuck are we talking about edition
Fantasy
Selected:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21329.jpg
General:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21328.jpg
Flowchart:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21327.jpg
Science Fiction
Selected:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21326.jpg
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21331.jpg
General:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21332.jpg
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21330.jpg
NPR's Top 100 Science Fiction & Fantasy Books:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21333.jpg
Previous Threads:
>>9786011
>>9775050
>>9768174
>>9757955
>>9750631
>>9739913
>>9730551
>>9718098
anygayfantasy?
Any mech kino recommendations?
>>9797037
No, we all grimdark now.
Any good protestant books?
>>9796835
The bibble and that Burpo kid's book, Heave is For Reals.
>>9796835
>Protestantism
>>9796835
Protestantsim is heresy, you heretic faggot.
Have you ever refused to buy a book because of its cover?
>>9796380
Only from online purchases.
Most my books don't have the best covers. But I am a picky artist sort.
This cover for one is so much better than the white and green thing I picked up
>>9796380
sometimes, but fantasy cheese like OP are a plus not a minus
Not entirely related but the other day a friend if mine showed me a pic of a girl he likes. It was an instagram pic if her laying over a boulder with a copy of The Hobbit next to her. It had a caption over it that read "A perfect moment of quietness and reading".
Now. Not only was the book The FUCKING Hobbit but it had the movie adaptation bookcover. To add salt to the injury the photo was taken very clearly at nightime with literally only the light of the flash. How I hated that picture. I punched my friend in the stomach just out of pure anger.
why do so many people disagree on its meaning? which writer had the most accurate description of the term?
Some people use it to refer to a stateless, classless commune, and other people use it to refer to any government built on communist ideology.
>>9795955
I like this one
https://www.marxists.org/archive/camatte/wanhum/wanhum04.htm
>>9795955
I think communists probably have the best handle on what it means, as literally thousands of them have written literally hundreds of thousands of pages on what it is
But, you know, communist manifesto is a good guide to what the historical program and aims of communist organization were. If you're curious I would start there, takes like an hour to read.
Just how bad is this book?
Fifty Shades of Grey tier
Literally just posting his face triggers hysteria from atheists. Is it because Peterson is exposing their insecurities and the degeneracy of their cult of atheism?
It probably explains why theists are so much more well adjusted than atheists. If you engage an atheist in dialectical discussion he suddenly shrinks back, thinking "I've been found out."
>>9794447
nah it is the mediocrity of a rationalist who love to think his opinions matter.
>>9794447
i know nothing about Peterson and will use this thread to ask general questions about him because I can tell you're the type of anon who won't be able to resist.
Who is Peterson and why is he all over /lit/ and youtube and wherever else? He just looks like every other meme-psued only with a 'surrogate dad' angle which has made him a fuckload of money
>>9794457
>I don't know who he is but I'm going to psychoanalyze him and the entirety of the people who like him
Yeah... sure. How about actually watching a lecture of him, instead of acting like you're Freud or Lacan on the internet.