Is suicide morally wrong? If so, how and why?
>inb4 "MUH BIBLE"
Christfags need not reply
>>9843266
>Is suicide morally wrong?
no.
It would make my mother very sad, and then she would have no family.
I am honestly amazed by men who commit suicide when they have a wife and children.
I can't do it now and from what I understand about being a partner or even more a parent and being able to still take that final step is impressive.
Post a book.
Post a name.
Read that book if your name is called, anons. Some people are desperate to have their weird Slavic-Japanese fusion name called out that is supposedly very common btw.
Gordon
Dennis or Denis
I think you'll appreciate a guy flying to Heaven on a giant insect rather than a pegasus just in case if the insect gets tired then the guy can feed it his farts
Tyler, Edward or Robert
got any Kens?
What do I read before him, apart from the Greeks ?
Spinoza
>>9843237
Bible
Code of Manu
>>9843237
schopenhaur
This is genuinely the most thrilling thing I've read all year.
> Agamemnon and Achilles have a falling out
> all of the Gods are either mega cunts to each other or mega cunts to the humans
> Hector becomes corrupted by his power and it leads to his downfall
> Achilles, legendary runner, cherished fighter, acts like a massive baby, becomes a cool guy fighter again and then becomes a horrendous, disrespectful monster
> soldiers bartering for their lives are insta-killed
> Diomedes is a crazy motherfucker
> Achilles' own golden shield tells stories of Greek cities, of music and violence
How the fuck does anybody not enjoy this? It's amazing.
Iliad thread, my dudes. What was your favourite aspect of it? Least favourite? Overall impression? Also general Homer discussion is cool too.
least favorite no doubt was the ship catalog but it's really not too long for it to put me off the rest of the book, definitely one of my favorite greek works
wanting to read aeschylus' prometheus bound next desu. want to read the oresteia too sometime.
> Patroclus' insults after beheading some Trojan dude
> "haha don't lose your head, my main man, haha this is crazy"
> body falls over
> "wow, I didn't know them there trojans were also skilled in acrobatics, wow they have such great poise lmao, do another trick then, dickhead"
Patroclus deserved what he got, desu.
>>9843214
I was somewhat siding with the Aecheans at first because they were failing and I felt awful about Achilles getting fucked over by Agamemnon, but by the end, when Achilleshas killed Hector and intends to desecrate his body rather than return the body to his familyI can't help but think Achilles was clearly an asshole all along.
Is this a good list? Which books can I add to it?
>inb4 go back to your containment board
pls no, it's comfy here
Doesn't matter what you read, just read, and stop wasting your time here.
>>9843195
I find it hard to believe that Plato and Machiavelli are on the same level as Orwell.
What exactly is wrong with this translation?
I'm diving headfirst into Dosto starting with Crime and Punishment but this is the only one I can find.
Doesn't flow well
Get McDuff
>>9843158
Just read it you fag it doesn't matter as much as you think
Has anyone read this? What should I expect?
>>9842974
Not only have I read it, but I read the pictured version (ML Giant), same old dust jacket even. It's loads of fun, with Carlyle as if literally calling the play-by-play. Whenever a participant he dislikes gets killed off, Carlyle both addresses him and removes him 'from the stage' Vaudeville style, as if a longish cane is extended into the narrative to hook him by the neck and yank him gibbering into hell. It's weird (this playing critic or absurdly wrathful God) kind of like a cartoon, even, but famous (among other reasons) for C's hero-worship of Mirabeau. One detects Dickens' (moreso than say Emerson's) huge stylistic debt to Carlyle in this piece. There's nothing even remotely like it among history books.
One caution. Have a sense of the timing of events from the Tennis Court Oath to the death of Robespierre or you may feel lost in places.
>>9842974
It is a highly stylized and partisan account of the revolution, in high english prose; as such it is a joy to read.
For a more modern accounting, Citizens by Schama
>>9843698
Citizens is good, but really a kind of Howard Zinnification, and therefore only helpful if you know the traditional casting of events along with it.
It seems like a huge contradiction. Unprovable thought experiments like pic related seem like a retarded way to prove that knowledge is impossible. We should be able to admit, accept, assume, etc that we aren't in a state of dreaming or just a brain in a vat. Why can't we all just admit that "we just aren't"?
Why is the "brain in a vat" thought experiment posed to non-skeptics by skeptics, who ask them to prove that we aren't? Shouldn't they have to prove that we ARE first?
>>9842972
It's an irrelevant point for most discussion anyway. If you simply agree that we are all brains in vats and move on with discussion then nothing changes.
Similarly the idea that we all live in a simulation poses no real change to experience because we have no means of doing anything with that information even if we could prove it.
>>9843008
So to 'solve' the scenario in a sense, can't you ask "what happens then if you kill yourself / when you die?" If you're a brain in a vat, it doesn't change anything of what death is; your brain is no longer running and you're dead. Killing yourself to get out of the simulation wont work because you would cease to exist in both worlds.
Like you said, we have no means of doing anything with that information. We all aren't in different simulations where the rules of universe are different, so we need to just move on with the discussion.
Traditionally, skepticism is couched in terms of lack of belief, not positive disbelief. Sometimes the Greeks called the latter negative dogmatism.
Anyone know of some good books on neuro linguistic programming or mass psychology? If you were an elite what would you read?
48 laws of power
>>9842962
>mass psychology
The propaganda portion of Mein Kampf and the documents of the Kims, Mao and Stalin.
>>9842962
The Crowd by Gustav le Bon is the OG book on mass psych
What are you thoughts on pic related? I don't read often and a female friend recommended this.
>female friend recommended this
dropped
>>9842902
I barely remember it, since I read it in middleschool, but I remember enough to know that it's not good. The plot hardly made any sense, and the writing is what you'd expect from a YA novel. It's basically a story about Nazi Germany with all the artificial feels that women love to consume.
>>9842903
She reads a lot and seems to have decent taste.
>read Crime and Punishment
>realise that Raskol means schism in Slavlanguages
>new interpretations open up before your eyes
>>9842890
>watch X-files for the 48time
>realise Duchovny means spooky in slavlanguages
>mfw Spooky Mulder is Spooky
>listen to Queen
>realise queen is faggot in slang
>freddie is faggot
>read Crime and Punishment
>empathize too much with Raskol'nikov
>have panic attacks as if I killed those 2 women
Nice.
What did famous author Bret Easton Ellis mean by this?
>>9842884
Who, who and who?
Jim Acosta getting btfo'd by Stephen Miller and Bret Easton Ellis both? What a day.
>>9842891
Fuk u m8
Coul you recommend me some books similar to Death on Credit?
>>9842869
Hey, I've never read Celine but intend to. What is Death on Credit like?
>>9842869
I wanted to read the Journey first, actually.
>>9842869
There isn't much like Celine but WS Burroughs is somewhat similar.
admit it
this book is about nothing, a waste of time hidden behind big words and inane ramblings
everyone claiming they enjoy or 'get' this book are lying
>>9842794
I agree, the Wake is much better
>>9842794
yeah i mean life is a story told by a stupid guy full of noise and anger meaning nada right
>>9842794
It' just a bunch of references coated in really nice prose.
6.3/10 wouldn't quite recommend it
Is it worth it to read a translated version of this, /lit/?
I can't find the English version for an affordable price where I live, and I'm skeptical of the translated version since the rising numbers of threads here about translations. It's the first time this is translated to my native language, so I don't have anything to compare it to.
I normally don't have that much of a problem reading translations, but I've heard somewhere that this particular work relies heavily on its prose to get its immersion and overall feel across.
Help me /lit/.
>>9842613
How the fuck should I know I don't even know what language you speak
>>9842623
Portuguese.
>>9842626
Read it in English if you are fluent. Wait until you can order one online or something. Use the time to get introduced to some of his easier work.