What are some arguments against antinatalism?
I don't know, but your existence is an argument in its favor.
>>7491863
Great literature discussion
>>7491863
>supporting antinatalism
Worth reading, or pretentious self indulgent garbage?
Also same for JR by Gaddis or Against the day by pynchon
>>7500514
oh crap meant this pic
>>7500515
Read libra and mao II first.
Underworld is fucking amazing
ATD is also fucking amazing but gets dry in the middle, if you push through to the finale its entirely worth it and by far Pynchon's best
JR by Gaddis is imo worth reading but only after you've read all of his other works or it comes across as pretentious self indulgent garbage. that or you need the patience of a stone.
also fuck Franzen.
Here are some books I've recently enjoyed
The ONE Thing
Psycho Cybernetics
The Alchemist
Siddhartha
The Sun Also Rises (was a reread but better the second time)
The Blank Slate
What have you recently enjoyed?
Your taste is shit
Joseph and his Brothers by Mann
On What Matters by Derek Parfit :3
I'd like to recommend you some books:
The Corpus Hermeticum - Hermes Trismigistus
The Consolation of Philosophy - Boethius
Essays in Idleness - Kenko
Why do you support the destruction of small businesses by buying your books from Amazon, anons?
Because I can get exactly what I want delivered to my front door for cheap.
Cheap
Easy
Better inventory
>tfw you aren't a wagecuck
>tfw you get enough money to buy any books you want for doing absolutely nothing
>tfw you have all the free reading time in the world
I am the patrician reader.
>tfw you are a wagecuck
>tfw you get enough money to buy any books you want but have to work hard for it
>tfw you have no time, at all, to read, and are too exhausted to do anything when you get home
I am the wagecucked reader.
>>7499592
and yet here you are, wasting time on /lit/
>>7499597
When you have all the time in the world, what is a for shitposts here and there?
One can really only know himself and his kind.
Two contradictory ideas that you are ready to believe, at that same moment in time, one being adapted from a certain nietzschean axiom, battle it out and the final arbiter is drawn out from his shell and released in full form, and one then knows, at that exact same time that neither statement is true and that we are judged by passion.
One might be seen as indecisive when one is really wanting to just go along and see how he feels about it. This is one who lives by his principles.
A return to form is needed. That philosophy is fundamentally useless, this is very clear. At this point i realize that i at once comprehend everything and know nothing at the same time. So i will discard offering new knowledge and instead repeat what has already been said in a very hostile way. Abuse shall be the new epistemic standard, and wine shall flow from all cunts at once
You aren't important enough to warrant your own thread on an anonymous image board.
>>7499466
Weeew lad
>>7499466
Ayy stan thread.
>"Would you like to say prayer with the family before eating? Your mother says she always sees you with books about God."
yeah, the gOD Delusion.
>>7499409
>that book is about how atheists must be delusional for not believing in God, right?
>>7499409
>mfw opposite problem
>want to say prayer before eating but know my whole family would make fun of me or get really awkward
Can we all agree on this, familia?
>>7499116
>great lit: game of thrones, no gravitys rainbow.
trash
>garfield
>gone home
>game of thrones
GOod fucking bait
>>7499116
>anime
why bother with capitalization at the beginning of sentences? we have periods. it's great for highlighting names, otherwise it's pointless.
inb4 follow it becuz it's the rule even though it adds nothing mechanical to grammar since we have punctuation and we just convinced ourselves it looks nice.
i don't do it on the internet. it's a remnant from an obsolete medium.
reforms have been tried but they never stick because >muh prescriptivism
>>7499069
>periods
murika
>>7499069
Punctuation and capitalisation are used to rest the eye between sentences. I find it helps me concentrate more on what the author is trying to say, and let's me easily go back through the text and pick up something I would like to read again. Without it, I suspect the eye would be tired far more quickly having less structure to form a natural pause, and reading for long periods of time would be more difficult and distracting.
punctuation and capitalisation are used to rest the eye between sentences. i find it helps me concentrate more on what the author is trying to say, and let's me easily go back through the text and pick up something i would like to read again. without it, i suspect the eye would be tired far more quickly having less structure to form a natural pause, and reading for long periods of time would be more difficult and distracting.
punctuation and capitalisation are used to rest the eye between sentences i find it helps me concentrate more on what the author is trying to say and lets me easily go back through the text and pick up something i would like to read again without it i suspect the eye would be tired far more quickly having less structure to form a natural pause and reading for long periods of time would be more difficult and distracting
I got drunk as fuck for like a long time and was sad because my fiancee left me and I guess I hid a bunch of poems around my computer. I'm just now finding some of these.
"I'm filled with pain and grief
You're a bandit, a heart theif
You excel at your craft
Leaving the wrecked hearts of men in your path
Another love struck casualty
It started with magic, yet ended so tragic
This war is ruthless, cold and manic"
"You wear your heart on your sleeve
Pulled mine out, and wore it with ease
The poison is on my breath
Trying to forget what I knew best"
"You are dead to me
This I know
Yet when I sleep
There is always an empty pillow
A spot for your head
Reserved in my bed
For the day you come back.
I doze off
Thinking of the ghost girl
I met so long ago"
>>7498983
lmao what a fucking nerd
no wonder she left you
>>7498986
>reads books
>calls someone else a nerd
>>7498983
at first i thought that was a pic of a pig's head mounted on a stake. then i was dissapoint.
How does /lit/ feel about this book?
hehe... meme
go back to /pol/
God I love memes!
How does one write an interesting sociopathic character without coming off as pretentious?
Maybe I set my standards too high, and have yet to find good examples, but I'm tired of seeing all these wannabe characters do disturbing things solely for shock value.
>>7498930
What about a character seeking relief and it's less about pleasure and more about the release.
you could frame it more like an illness i guess, but have them acknowledge that they are "meant" to be healthy.
They know it's selfish but it's the only way to cope. Still might be a bit to pretentious.
Make them on the good side. Make them a good sociopath.
Have it so when they talk to the protagonist they come off as unhinged or distant, or if they ARE the protagonist then everyone else doesn't like the looks of them or tries to get away from them or is disturbed.
I remember reading something about how some sociopaths are better soldiers because they feel no remorse, however they still have a compass of sorts and don't want to torture or shoot innocent people because it wouldn't be constructive. Write someone like that. A constructive sociopath. Someone who only sees people as useful tools rather than playthings, and who only sides with the good guys because of his own preconceptions of efficiency and progress.
>>7499023
this is being done all over though. that's the whole james bond series dude.
Do you have a daily page quota?
Or do you have a daily time quota?
I feel like I don't read enough and I'm thinking about using a timer to read an hour a day. Obviously I can go beyond the timer or read at other times of day.
>>7498730
(If you save pic related, I'd recommend changing the filename to CatCatRorschach or something similar; it's a picture of Catcat, Catdog's cousin)
quotas make me shudder. why would you have to force something that is meant to be pleasurable on yourself?
>>7498730
None. I just read when I like, and because I like to read, I read a lot per day anyway.
Post books you're reading.
/sci/ just reads textbooks.
>Euclid's Elements
>J.S. Mill's Principles of Political Economy
>Homer's Iliad
>Plato's Republic
>Darwin's Origin of Species
The Origin of Species is immaculate. An incredible read for anyone wondering how evolution works, even how incipient species originate.
>reading outdated science books
lol you're a retard. if you want to learn about evolution, read a textbook.
>>7498722
Not sure if delusional freshman or delusional NEET
Anyone doing graduate work in Philosophy or other related disciplines? I'm applying for MPhil/PhD programmes in Philosophy in the UK and I was wondering what people's experience with the academy is, especially when it comes to Cont Phil.
>>7498139
a bump bump a
>>7498168
I'm also interested. I'd fucking kill myself if I did more school but I'm in STEM.
I did an MA in ancient philosophy, wantd to do a doctorate.
But the ivory tower is so suffocating and the idea of never leaving school became horrifying.
Really glad I left now.To each his own though.