Best novel by Mario Vargas Llosa?
La Hombre. A prescient novel of tranny living in Peru.
Aunt Julia
>>7636306
Take off your pants you are in the presence of a poet
How much of a philosophical background do I need to read and understand this?
It's useful to be familiar with Nietzsche but that's pretty much it.
Read Schopenhauer and Vico instead
>>7635137
start with the greeks
I'm making a chart of books one should read to understand the allusions and references in Ulysses.
I have seen plenty of anons asking what they should read before Ulysses, so I figured we should just make a handy chart.
Please post suggestions ITT and I will add them to the chart in a few hours.
Poetry of Yeats and Blake.
>>7630304
Also, The Bible obviously. Can't believe you hadn't already added that one OP.
>summa
but why
So, either Jonathan Blow browses /lit/ or people actually read Tommy 'shit teeth' Pinecone outside of meme websites.
Discuss.
Don't know who that is and don't care. The Guardian sucks. "Reclusive" people don't do op-eds in national papers.
my mum reads him lad
PTA made a fuckin Pynchon movie last year m8
I decided while reading (pic related) to cast people I know as the characters in the book. As in I'd envision those real people saying and doing what the characters were up to. Has anyone else tried this? With what book/characters?
From a writing perspective, what you are describing is every traditional novel, ever. Millions of examples.
For casting ... do you mean you want to do a film?
For myself, yes I have written this.
Anybody else like Chuck Bowden? I got into him by chance after finding 'Blue Desert' on a $1 bookshelf and picked it up because I liked the cover.
Really one of the coolest guys ever to put ink on paper.
>>7636317
Edward Abbey/Hunter Thompson/Michael Herr
>>7636317
Chuck Jr stop trying to revive ya daddy's literary estate and get a real job
I just published a poetry collection specifically aimed for the "4Chan" demographic. It's a poetry collection I describe as part decadent travel journal, part sci-fi/fantasy nightmare & part nihilistic daydream.
One cool thing is I describe some of the whoremonger experience in places like Amsterdam & Bangkok if you've ever been curious. Dominant themes are debauchery, madness, loneliness & death.
Check it out if you will (you can view the first 3-4 poems for free to see if you like it): http://www.amazon.com/dp/B01B51ZNN6?ref_=pe_2427780_160035660
>>7636261
You can read a bunch of free stuff at www.jasonkessler.net too. Much love 4Chan.
Hey, /lit/. My friend is describing a book he read in school in 8th grade, but it's been over 10 years and he can't remember what it was called.
He was saying it was like A Wrinkle in Time with unstable dimensions. At some point, the heroine sees a group of stones in a shop, and the keeper asks her to pick just one. Each resembles powers or something like that. He also remembers a black lake where that girl meets another version of herself, who tells her all the things she's doing wrong. There's also a guy who leads her through these fantasy worlds. Sound familiar to anyone?
We're good friends so I can ask more questions if you guys come up with something to ask. OH, and the book MIGHT have had "blue" in the title.
>can't even escape Heraclitus on /lit/
Someone get this nigga to fuck off
>>7636182
What does a book written in the 2000s have to do with some ancient philosopher?
How much does the cover of a book influence the way you read it? Are you willing to pay more for the same book but with a better cover? Are you more likely to read a book if it has an intriguing cover?
General discussion about the physical appearance of books
>tfw only cover available is the movie adaptation one
I dislike when books have pictures of the characters on the cover. Every reader will arrive at an idiosyncratic idea of what a character looks like within the confines of the author's description. To have a picture of the character is imposing someone else's interpretation onto yours before you even begin the book.
Can anyone help me? I'm trying to remember the name of a historian who was pretty fucking based.
>Lived life of a crusader on pilgrimage, traveling on horse through the middle east
>sailed an authentically recreated ship to see if it was possible for aboriginals to reach far off islands
Only vaguely helpful information I can remember is that he was in an article on cracked.com before the site turned to shit. I think he had a Scandinavian name as well.
Do you mean Tim Severin? He's so based I'm pretty sure he's going to be considered a myth like Brendan.
>>7635741
Thor Heyerdahl
Wow he's... great, just great, a joy to ride and an incrediby intelligent man.
>a joy to ride
OP you sick necrophiliac fuck
>>7634958
fuck I meant a joy to read
>>7634958
Wow... you can't even make good threads. You lazy dumb fuck.
>the warosu archive will be back they said
>he's just on vacation they said
why do you need an archive of a mongolese art board?
>>7633425
To direct people to when they make the same threads over and over again.
>>7633471
why does it bother you seeing the same threads over and over again? life is too short for that kind of business.
Hello Lit, in my book club we have one member who believes in critical theory, very much a postmodernist. Which makes it very hard to discuss books due to her using these arguments of critical theory. She is a lesbian and wants to look at every book through a lesbian, female or feminist viewpoint. What is the best arguments to take on critical theory and in particular, post modernism? Counter examples maybe? Or maybe a few philosophers have argued against it? Let me know the best way to attack as it is driving me mad....
more like
Premodern: here's how it is,
Modern: it's not what it was, was it ever?
PostModern: who's to say what is or was one way or another?
>>7633375
you can 'do' critical theory without believing in its philosophical orientations. If she's making a strong case and the only thing you can do is strawman the boogyman of the postmodern, that's pretty childish.
>>7633375
If that's all she's doing with postmodernism she's a boring ideologue
Dont engage her, dismiss her as uninteresting.
>people who criticize a book because they can't identify with any of the characters
>people who write a book off as "too confusing"
>people who call a book pretentious
What triggers you, /lit/?
people who compare pynchon to shakespeare
Lit major here
Our classes have come to
>book x is shit because there are no female characters
>book y sucks because the protagonist is a weakling
>book z sucks because plot
>>7633070
that first one triggers me something fierce because 'relating' is the most narcissistic 'stupid pleb thing to say' when it comes to talking about media and I hear it constantly
Enlighten me.
8=D
>>7632247
>>7632241
This is water