Is Ken follet good?
Are you asking me?
What is the good?
Which lisbon did you want to fuck the most
-lux
>>7743937
How old was the youngest?
Hey /lit/ if you were a woman, what would you be reading?
I just finished Amy Poelher's book "Yes Please". I loved the insights she gave on working with the SNL crew, and her dazzling and courageous bravery described in the face of the hardships of being a female comedian. This woman is funny, sexy, and strong, my new idol in life.
I'm thinking about reading "Is Everyone Hanging Out Without Me? (And Other Concerns)" by Mindy Kaling. It look's like a difficult read so I may have to have my girlfriends read it with me, or maybe consult a booktube overview.
>>7743901
I know you're poking fun at the notion that she's been horribly oppressed, but you have to admit that she's one of the tiny sub-handful of legitimately funny female comedians.
>>7743912
You are the cancer that is killing /lit/. We finally get a thread about a decent book and you want to destroy it, shameful.
Im a 26 year-old male starting to write his first book. I was wondering if there is enough male readers out there who would be interested in a story surrounding 2 male college students and roomates (not homosexual) who are trying to get rich quick by breaking into rich peoples houses. Their aim is to get the money to fit in with the cool crowd of 30k millionaire douche bags in their town and the rich kids at their university. Im trying to be respectful to women and don't believe in sexualizing female charactors so if I dont mask a porn as a story like Game of Thrones or 50 shades could I attract a male audience? And even though im a male author that respects women can a story about 2 dudes with not very female characters appeal to a female audience? Id appreciate it if you could give me brutally honest advice as I want to get it right.
Men generally don't want to read porn. Judging from the way you wrote your post, I don't think there's a lot of hope for your novel in general.
you should probably just an hero now op you're hopeless
Write for yourself, not for a specific audience.
Also this, >>7743856
dont hate me /lit/ but im not usually one for the classics. a couple chapters in and i just google the plot and summary notes just so i know the tropes and concepts. every once and a while though there's always a classic that holds up like The Island of Doctor Moreau (imho). so /lit, does lovecraft hold up or should i just google for the notes? which ones to read and which to skip?
pic fuckin related.
Generally it's agreed that the mythos he founded was good but his writing is mediocre at best, generally poor.
>>7743817
>is lovecraft any good
yes
> should i just google for the notes
no
> a couple chapters in and i just google the plot and summary notes just so i know the tropes and concepts
does anyone actually read a book for its own sake anymore?
if you scroll down a bit you'll see another thread on this.
these are the 4 /lit/ takes:
1) lovecraft is garbage
2) lovecraft was original hugely influential. he's good but not literary.
3) he's not good, but he wasn't trying to be good. a man's gotta eat
4) nigger
>tfw you are from european nonrelevant country
>tfw your book will never be /lit/ meme
Today I Wrote Nothing, or Zettels Traum, may make it into memehood some day
>>7743798
>You will never grow up in the 19th century on a poor farm north of London, read English at Cambridge, pen your magnum opus, and die of cancer leaving your penniless widow with 2 young children
Why live?
>tfw Joyce always looks sort of weak and emaciated in his photos
>tfw he was actually a living breathing person who got shitfaced with Hemingway and probably assaulted others regularly
/lit/, thread with our librarys
my library
>>7743771
half these stupid things mean the same thing. Intending to read/ saving for later
will never read/ purely for show/will never read
I read books for their engaging stories... not the message i'm suppose to receive or the sole fact they're "classics"
Somehow, I feel like this makes me a bad human, but i'm not sorry about it.
I'd take The Golden Compass and Harry Potter over Catcher in the Rye, Infinite Jest, and For Whom the Bell Tolls any day of the week. I keep Jane Austen novels on my shelf to seem more astute, however I only made it halfway through Emma and a quarter of the way though Pride and Prejudice.
Any other plebs out there that pick up books for the story and not the "amazing metaphor and cultural awareness" (no matter how pretentious) a book tries to convey?
what if I don't find stories in themselves to be engaging
Catcher in the Rye is a pretty engaging story. Persuasion is probably the best story of Austen, though Emma is pretty good in that front too.
>reading for plot
Who are some good black authors who don't talk about muh racism
>>7743742
He's just telling it like it is. If you think it's whiny, then maybe that's a you problem.
>>7743752
*tips cabbie hat*
>>7743752
Oh hai taniqua redcoats!
> Muh favorite book is pic related.
How badly memed am I?
why don't you make a thread where you don't post like a retard
what is Gruz 200 of literature?
I don't know. I've seen it though, and it fucked me up a little bit. The scene where he tosses her boyfriend's corpse into the bed was impressively disturbing, and I thought I was pretty immune to disturbing films.
>Cargo 200 (Russian: Гpyз 200 "Gruz 200") is a Russian thriller film from 2007 by Aleksei Balabanov depicting the late Soviet society. The action is set during culmination of the Soviet war in Afghanistan in 1984. The movie's title Cargo 200 refers to the zinc coffins in which dead Soviet soldiers were shipped home.
>Though it claims to be based on a true story, it is in fact based on William Faulkner's novel Sanctuary, which was set in Mississippi in 1929.
OC like the professor of atheism going religion was complete nonsense but funny if you know where the myth is from. A lot of atheism professors became theology professors after the collapse of the USSR and they would naturally tell stories about how they were undercover christians all the time.
Is this book good? Is it about love?
Does /lit/ not read gay black books?
there aren't any black characters in it afaik
it's his best book
>>7743796
His best book is Another Country.
So I was a senior in highschool and just beyond babbon tier brain function. I was scheduled to take an AP literature class and was very excited. Supposedly we were going to read books and short stories, write about it and throw in a little discussion. This sounded wonderful to me. The problem is, once we read the story the teacher would TELL US WHAT IT MEANT and have us write our papers based on what SHE SAID IT MEANT. This pissed the never-ending hell out of me especially since our grade would be lowered on essays if we did not agree on the meaning. Her seasoning was "I am getting my masters in literature, and for that reason have a stronger grasp on the intentions of these authors." It didnt even matter how many quotes and how thoroughly you could support an interpretation, hers was right. It would honestly have been a pleasure if she came across as a bright mind with bright ideas, but instead she seemed insecure about her actual knowledge of the field and was trying to fight her own insecurities and seemed to belong in gender studies with her interpretations always being based around sexism against women. Help me.
>>7743704
Sounds like you need to grow up and be more assertive. Furthermore, you have not yet matured to the point where you have learned to function in an institution.
1. Give your boss, teacher, or professor what they want how they want it.
2. Self motivate and educate in your own time or during allowed discussion groups.
3. Repeat as you acquire merit and awards.
4. Attain scholarship or promotion, or resume fodder leave institutional constraints for better situation.
Stop being a child.
>>7743704
quit being such a bitch. just admit to yourself that you aren't some god-tier student and sometimes you are wrong. plain and simple. wrong. that's why in the beginning of some books, dubliners for instance, there will be an introduction to help guide you through the novel. no one expects you to get 100% on the first read through, but if you do, whoop de doo. congratz. you've gotten better at reading a book.
And as far as your teacher, she is just another thing you'll have to cope with. that's the way some people are. is it great? no. but deal with it and try to get through your course as best as you can. you're only really hurting yourself in this matter. worry about your own interpretations when it doesn't matter, like right now on this very board, where you could be creating a worth while post instead of that shit.
>>7743712
I did all of those things. that entire list was what I did when I saw what sort of teacher I had.
Hey /lit/izens, I'm looking for short story writers of the fantastic genre to read, besides borges, given that my smugness tells me I've had enough for a while.
Chesterton? Woolfe?
Thanks in advance
>>7743664
Wolfe, definitely.
>>7743664
Best short story writer is Chekhov.
Ward No 9, The Bishop and Rothchilds Fiddle are his best IMO
What's the contemporary take on sublimation (or related concepts) in intellectual circles?
Anything that concerns nofap, semen retention, avoiding pornography etc. and isn't biased nor purely scientific/empirical..
Some book recommendations or authors or a tl;dr would be great
>>7743649
>no recycling your semen
dumb as a bag of severe dicks, op.
>>7743653
Does recycling foreign semen count? It's always so disgusting after I came and stale semen probably wouldn't have the same efect..