Give me a good true crime book.
Crime and Punishment
In Cold Blood
the original
Ferdinand von Schirach wrote some that have become a bit reknown
Any good books on how to educate yourself in a subject? or how to develop yourself as a reader?
Start with the Greeks
I think you have to follow text from left to right with your eyeballs and understand what you´re reading, I might be mistaken though
>give me a book that teaches me how to read books
Daily reminder to leave this board as quickly as possible, before your priorities shift to trying to fit in by shouting buzzwords and insults instead of actually enjoying literature.
Thanks
t. 2009 poster
>>7794375
I really hope I never get to the point where I stop thinking about what I'm reading, stop examining the complexities of it, and stop forming my original thoughts on it and "just read, man", relegating word and thought to just another shiny consumable to feel and then discard.
nah that's just something you do initially. Most boards you stop caring and memeing a few months in.
So like.... he won right?
>Stephen King
>on a literature board
no, >>>/trash/
>mfw that one kid rips his own throat out with his bare hands while screaming to the heavens
>>7794366
yes he won, but he didint know that, thats why he continues to walk.
the ending was OK, but the novel itself really terrible...
I heard this is a god-tier book for understanding people. Can anyone on /lit/ verify?
It's the only " text book" I kept from six years in Psychology.
Definitely the definitive social psych book, to the point that everyone in the field is terrified to even try and compete. You will not find another good book that covers the broad range of social psychology issues.
Whether that is right or not is questionable, but if you want to get into social psych, you will find that every other relevant text is building off of Aronson, not competing with him. Generations of social psychologists have been educated based on his writing.
>>7794303
ah finally an answer, thank you.
>>7794303
will this book redpill me?
If your fellow anon wrote an instructional guide named How to Get Over Yourself what topics would you expect it to cover?
A shot in the dark here, but maybe How to Get Over Oneself.
>>7794243
10 seconds after my post submitted I knew I was going to get this reply
This thread up to my post is a great read.
For those of you who are unfamiliar with how problematization works, here is what it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problematization
First of all, I will not outright say problmetization is useless in of itself, rather I will say it is a bad thing insofar as what it is intended to do. The method was developed by Foucault as a *replacement* for polemic, and that right there is an issue, because problematization does not fulfill the function of polemic, and in this capacity it is seriously flawed on two counts.
1. It does not actually argue against the *truth* of a statement, rather it is attacks the motive of a statement.
2. It automatically makes all that is traditional "problematic' simply for being traditional. I consider this a grave error. Has anyone here read Burke? Then you understand why this is so dangerous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_OLom4lvdA
If anyone had a rebuttal to my issues, please post it.
Please go away and don't come back
>>7794140
This is problematic
>>7794150
What did I do wrong?
>I'm a bit of a literature buff. Vonnegut, Green, Pratchett? The list could go on!
>>7794065
could it, OP? could it?
>>7794066
+ GRRM, Rowling, Tolkien.
So I rarely see this guy discussed here, actually i dont think i ever have. Im a big Faulkner fan and i was reading somewhere that Faulkner was asked to rank his contemporaries and he put Thomas Wolfe as number 1.
anyone here read him? how would you describe him? whats his best/worst works?
hes shit
Where do I start with Nietzsche?
>>7794030
the greeks
>>7794037
Already read the Greeks. Now I'm about to start Nietzsche
>>7795098
Chronological
How is this book any different from YA fiction?
>>7794009
What is YA fiction? To me its anything that appeals largely to people age 13- 25, the fact that people within this age range don't want what they love described as being such comes down to their age, pretentiousness, and their wish to be seen as full adults mentally if not physically. Truth is any book you read before 25-30 needs reading again later, you may have read it, but you havent read it as an adult.
>>7794009
Who cares? It's a really good book imo.
Daily reminder that if you unironically enjoy "Stoner" youre a rape apologist
>>7793948
>He... rapes her several times during the book.
>He doesn't seem to have any agency...
The two do not compute. If you lack agency, you lack the ability to rape.
well, i got to at least give her credit for the trigger warning
>I couldn't empathize with the characters
>it was boring
Probably the two most overused and unsubstantial critiques forwarded by these kind of people
I'll be spending an upcoming weekend alone in a secluded wooded location. I don't read horror a lot.
Can I get a top 3 in horror?
Thanks
Pic related. It's about the only horror I've read besides The Bumps.
>>7793904
Lovecraft
Poe
Ligotti
Clive Barker's Books of Blood
Algernon Blackwood
etc
1 The Alchemist, by Paulo Coelho
2 The Fault In Our Stars, by John Green
3 To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee (white)
This might sound like a shitpost so bear with me. I know this isn't traditional horror. But these books make the ordinary reader reveal in a flash human nature in all its horror. The maudlin, hypocritical sentimentality. The thoughtless, shapeless banality, more sinister than any incomprehensible monster of Lovecraftian ken for its very comprehensibility,
just finished reading a bunch of essays by orwell and huxley...wanna get out of highschool core. recommend some patrician essay compilations/books
>>7793886
Gödel, Escher, Bach.
Jean Genet
Is he good?
No. He's positively wicked!
>>7793740
très utile ton commentaire
>>7793740
Folly