Thought about reading pic related. Do I have to read anything beforehand?
>>7845923
The entire western canon. Then you'll be halfway there.
ulysses cannot be read. only re-read.
>>7845924
But that's a meme
>what the author meant
>>7845886
>what some undergraduate twat reads into the text
>>7845886
>what the reader thinks
>>7845886
>Plato's Republic was really a quirky action-adventure romance about a quirky princess with newly-discovered magical powers who must save the kingdom and at the same time navigate an awkward love triangle with her in the middle.
Write the most batshit, outlandish, avant garde, post-metamodernist (etc.) shit you can think of off the top of your head.
GO
OP; - Is...a; a fag?!
Kangaroo notebook?
Idunno.
Haley Carnasus, Parsimons ate, and spit seeds out like God spit men out of Eden, and stepped upon the seeds that they might split, and never sprout, and nothing be of them ever but as salted earth and dessert upon mars beneath sun within world beneath creation of god of things unknown to man who was by god made who by man is worshiped beneath sun.
I ran out of things to say before I was born, it's all worthless words hurled like fistfuls of sand at granite mountains.
I am told there are molecules in brain that there is hope and goodness and (I am told by me) I have seen it. It has seen me, it is not for a meaning but for a brief fulfillment of purpose, it is garbage to simply point out and speak about what is being spoken about.
I hate writing, I hate wanting to be someone who I am not yet, I hate wanting to be admired and loved and suspecting I am not.
I hate journalistic self-appraisal and appeals to "can't we all just get along we're all alike I am like you." This is a swelling void that is a sucking vacuum that can eat everything.
I would rather speak of forests, but I do not know the names of trees, nor can I tell elm from oak, nor have I heart to stomach swallow.
There is foam upon ocean, exhausted analogy. Humans lack the ontological constitution of numbers, product of primes, perfect, I wish my intestines were made of porcelain and amber. My moods are made of terra cotta and I sift swallowing cockstruck sand, say random things to razzle and dazzle you.
You and me, me and you, we are, we are not, we are, we are not, there is nothing to say, language is pointless, but it is not.
Haley Carnasus is a lovely girl and a stupid pun. Footnotes belong in essays, biographies are essays, being candid is forced and fake. fuck man, fuck, do you like this? do you hate it? You must hate it. You can't say you like it or hate it now. You are not a critic, you are a stupid human with pointless words too. Your prose is garbage like mine.
Reading this fucking nonsense, still confused as fuck 50 pages in. What the fuuuuuuck is a sovereign relation of ban? What the fuck is nomos basileus? Why is this cunt even talking about metaphysics and Aristotle? Does this piece of shit even follow any logical structure or is that too much to expect from the fucking continent?
>homo
nice try
>>7845272
Shut up you cunt and help me understand this
State of Exception
Political Theology
etc.
Post yours, rate others
Night Genesis
Inherent Jest or Infinite Vice, not sure
>>7844750
Definitely Infinite Vice, dude. Definitely. That's good shit right there. I'd read that. Mos def fo sho.
What about mine? I'm between Gravity's Meridian or Blood Rainbow. Not sure.
>>7844849
Blood Rainbow is metal af
I'm calling mine Notes From Ulysses
Fresh off the Tao Lin, get it while it's hot:
https://m.soundcloud.com/taolin/two-hour-podcast-about-my-writing-1
It's awful tbqh
absolute madman
go to bed Tao Lin
Opinions on "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"?
>>7844460
The title represents my life.
>>7844466
How do you eat?
>>7844475
you dont eat when you take meth all day
this is a thread about meth, right?
Could this man be considered a philosopher?
Sure, he did some research on scientific matters, such as urinary and fecal incontinence (Screw cancer, let's make advancements on the art of pee and poo), but most of his claims are very subjective and opinion-based, particularly on "the future of and illusion" and "civilization and it's malcontents".
Is he the father of psichoanalysis? A philosopher on disguise? A cocaine-addicted hobo?
Read Freud As Philosopher. Might help to read Lacan too.
>>7847186
Yes he is the father of psychoanalysis. But he isn't a philosopher because 1. His theories were gathered from case studies and is centered around the analytic situation. 2. He's more concerned with answers rather than questions.
Only if you read objective psych to go with your subjective psych.
Is he America's greatest living writer?
Why or why not?
>>7846722
No, because Gass, Barth, and McElroy are still (barely) alive.
>>7846722
> America's greatest living writer
> Not Pinecone
Plebs.
>>7846732
Whatever you want to say about No Country for Old Men and The Road, they are far above this swill.B-but anon, he was just doing it for a fun paycheck!Sure. Sure he was.
Do You know some good historical novels to learn history?
I miss the times when I was not paying much attention to the lessons of history, as I regret it, but I find it hard to read the essays. I find them very boring. I prefer to live adventures and, at the same time learn a little something.
Get something by Mika Waltari
>>7846684
I, Claudius
also that one that was really popular a few years ago about building a cathedral
War and peace
Opinions on this?
I read it many many years ago. It's a decent book if you're not treating it as a guide. It's basically from what I remember a bunch of stories and experiences.
>>7844829
This, it's entertaining. It's also dated as fuck, the kind of thing that worked then don't work nowadays.
>>7844762
It's an interesting read, and it reads like a good magazine article. I would recommend reading it for the lessons that Strauss learns along the way.
Strauss concludes that if he's confident and has something going on in his life, then everything plays out well. He also realizes that hedonistic pursuits should not be one's focus.
Its a fun read overall. Has shitty advice for picking up girls at the bar, but has good life lessons.
How do filthy continentals recover after reading the below greentext? Zizek? BTFO! Hegel? BTFO! Nietzsche? BTFO!
Even Stirner, who I like, wrote a big fat boring book that could have been two pages long at most.
Why does the government give money to those sneaky conniving continentals? False analogies, over-extrapolation, appeals to authority, flowery and dense and incoherent language, over-abstraction, not speaking English, 100% unfalsifiable assertions, disgusting pseudo-scientific use of scientific concepts, the use of fiction / jokes in order to create false analogies, complete ignorance of empirical data... is there no length the Eternal Continental will not go to in order to gain followers and a juicy book deal with Verso or their alternative publisher of choice?
>What you’re referring to is what’s called “theory.” And when I said I’m not interested in theory, what I meant is, I’m not interested in posturing–using fancy terms like polysyllables and pretending you have a theory when you have no theory whatsoever. So there’s no theory in any of this stuff, not in the sense of theory that anyone is familiar with in the sciences or any other serious field. Try to find in all of the work you mentioned some principles from which you can deduce conclusions, empirically testable propositions where it all goes beyond the level of something you can explain in five minutes to a twelve-year-old. See if you can find that when the fancy words are decoded. I can’t. So I’m not interested in that kind of posturing.Žižekis an extreme example of it. I don’t see anything to what he’s saying. Jacques Lacan I actually knew. I kind of liked him. We had meetings every once in awhile. But quite frankly I thought he was a total charlatan. He was just posturing for the television cameras in the way many Paris intellectuals do. Why this is influential, I haven’t the slightest idea. I don’t see anything there that should be influential.
I'm of no help to you, OP. I'm a Medievalist, I think the last 600 years of Western thought have been an awful mistake.
>>7841472
No shit. I'm a Antiquist, I think the last 1500 years of Western though have been an awful mistake.
western thought is a mistake
Can reading books ever be dangerous?
For example, if you're at the brink of insanity, depression or suicide - should you, for the sake of your own, stay away from certain books? Not wallow in the self-despair of Dostoyevsky for example.
Or is knowledge and insight ALWAYS what is good, and needed?
Yes
What is not commonly known, and that any serious reader will experience and have to overcome, is over reading produces a kind of a dependence on books to simply think. This is more dangerous than it sounds.
Yes, there are a lot of situations where it can be extremely dangerous. For example, do not read a book while sitting on train tracks.
>>7838847
The latter. It is the individual that determines how the knowledge and thought of another is integrated, for better or for worse. A certain level of maturity is needed for absorbing certain material in a balanced manner.
What are some /lit/-approved comic books?
None
>>7847253
fuck outta here
What's the edgiest book you own /lit/?
Bonus points if it's not Mein Kampf.
the original edgelord
Maos little red book
The Way of Men by Jack Donovan