How come most people are christians here?
aesthetics
>>9882155
migrants from /pol/
>>9882155
>how come most people who care to post about religion or christianity are christians
Have a guess
>"just be weird!!"
>inspires Israel Defence Forces in their urban warfare to break down the walls of civilian homes and move through them instead of streets
Whoah.... so this is.... the power of French continental philosophy
what is the point of threads like this? neck urself
>>9881986
fuck white people
"civilian" homes in the "peaceful" Gaza strip
>Romans 10:13, "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." Say, "Father in Heaven, I believe that Jesus died for my sins." And God will impart eternal life to your spirit.
WTF /lit/. I thought Heaven was a white gated community? You mean heaven will be full of drug addicts and rap loving degenerates?
The only reason I can function in life is knowing that I'm going to heaven and the scum around me won't. Now that I'm studying the bible I came across this little gem.
I'm so fucking shattered. I'm crying angry tears right now.
WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY!@@!@%$Wdhfjaskluu678980AEKLAES[RVAESDZAS
>>9881911
fuck off Nigel!
am half white and I have been doing my bidding so that I will finally be accepted among my fellow white men in heaven
>>9881921
Ok removing the racist elements still Heaven's going to be filled with shit tons of sick dopers and junkies who only accepted Jesus out of cowardice. There's literally no reason to be good.
My neighbors rap music is blasting at me while I'm trying to read the bible. I feel like God's mocking me.
I don't believe in Heaven anon, but if it's anything like the Bible says you're going to enjoy it and no amount of junkies, niggers or whatever will ruin it for you. Don't get angry about something you have no control over.
Can I get some recommendations on French literature besides Camus? I checked the /lit/ wiki but didn't find anything.
>>9881802
Victor Hugo
In translation?
>>9881802
Molière, Montesquieu, Laclos, Voltaire, Hugo, Maupassant, Zola, Flaubert, ect ...
where is he today?
Certainly not in this thread ;)
>>9881772
He lives in NYC I think.
he's eighty. he has trouble walking, he can't remember things, his eyes are bad, he's balding, his wife is balding and he can't get hard anymore. why doesn't his son call him more often? why doesn't the ipad his son got him ever seem to work? why do the icons keep changing? he watches TV and gets mad at Donald Trump and reminisces about the 50s and 60s when politicians - even the hyenas! - were professionals god damn it!!! he cringes at his early work and wonders why anyone ever read his books. he wonders if he ever had any real talent or if he was just faking it. he looks at that half finished draft on his table and wonders if he'll ever finish it. death is for him no longer some far off abstraction he can ramble on and on and on about in prose poetry, it is real, it is near, it is entirely boring to think about. he bemoans the left, his ineffectuality as a leftist, a revolutionary, his ultimate surrender. he does lots of crossword puzzles and reads Don Delillo's latest book, which he says is good.
Any good books about chess? I fucking suck at it.
chess is a stupid game, computers could already beat all humans at it in the fucking 90s which just shows how fucking lame it is
>>9881285
>A machine with near perfect foresight can beat an imperfect being
Fuck mate, what a shocker
>>9881289
it shows that it requires no intuition or intelligence, just an ability to mentally execute a search algorithm
Reading The Canterbury Tales while listening to this. It's pretty comfy desu.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpUwgruPHco
>>9881198
Also, what music is /lit/ listening to today?
One of my favorite albums desu
What does this have to do with the Canterbury tales?
Why wouldn't you just listen to early music?
How do you take notes while reading?
>>9881182
I don't. I'm not a brainlet.
>>9881183
No, you are. People with good brains know how fallible memory is, so they write stuff down in order to analyze and synthesize what they read.
>>9881193
>people with good brains know they have bad brains.
Your meme sucks. Even the Greeks laughed at any brainlet who needed to write shit down. They knew it lead to memory weakness.
>tfw identify strongly with Raskolnikov
I know that feel. Are you in the process of reading or have you finished the book?
>>9880769
your mom, sister. and best friend keep coming into your room and talking about you while you sleep?
>>9880776
Just begun part 4. Finding Rodya one of the more compelling protags I've read. Haven't read any other Dostoyevsky
What did this philosopher mean by this?
>>9880581
Is it okay for a man like Jordan Peterson to have an ego as he does
>>9880581
what philosopher? i only see the ramblings of the surrogated dad of some internet memesters
>>9880581
He wants to seem like he's not a weak, anxious academic trapped in verbal formulas perennially defeated by circumstance by attacking the 'prophets'
>Jordan Peterson says the basis for truth is utility
>evolutionary psychology is true
the basis of truth is my dick up your ass homo
>>9880358
>Jordan Peterson says the basis for truth is utility
his greatest flaw. pragmatist definition of truth is so fucking autistic
ree
>>9880358
His definition of truth isn't just utility. His epistemological argument is that, since science can only give us an incomplete picture of the complexities of the human mind and human society, that we should worry less about what we think is empirical truth and more about how we should act in a way that's beneficial to us, our family, and our environment. It's soft pragmatism.
>Pic related came in the mail today
Awwww yeah bois, time to stop being a confused piece of shit and get all those juicy answers
>>9879951
Haha
If onlySecond reading, OP
How am I supposed to "enjoy" this series if half the words are intentionally opaque as fuck?
>>9880112
do some research
it's usually coming from latin, greek or french
Holy shit, y'all - I think I just had a Marshall McLuhan moment, and I need muh nerds to hear me out and let me know if what I'm saying is a) already stated elsewhere; b) not particularly insightful; c) factually inaccurate; or d) Logically inconsistent.
I'm an actual teacher working on teachery shit, and I have an MA in Composition. No, I don't teach college. Yes, I could. Technically, I did for a Summer, but it was really not an adjunct position. I'm not planning to publish any of this, per se, so anything you see here may be fully consumed and reattributed to any current works or various academic endeavors that you may wish to splice into your current theories on education, media, sociology, critical theory (my fav), or other Humanity (presumably, though if you can apply it to a hard science or math, please do explain how and enjoy equal free use). This is the goddamn hivemind.
So, now that I've preambled this thing like a bitch, you're probably not going to be that impressed with the actual idea, so allow me to present it as a follow-up to this (what didn't originally intend to be) introduction to my appeal for assistance:
(note: pic unrelated, though technically an appropriate attention-getter, as I indeed seek feedback from any and all "you"s (second person plural implied, though the only English equivalent (curse our anemic pronoun selection)) might be "y'all")
(1/?)
>>9879741
Shit. Very old news and already obvious to everyone. Empirically wrong and self-contradictory.
>>9879741
Okay, so you know how bedeviling it is that people seem to treat words as if they are little more than brain-offal that you filter to some degree and spew out of your buccal orifice like a shotgun-blast of cognitive ballast which you only have to make enough sense with to temporarily require your conversant to make some sort of response, and hope that they don't actually attempt to deal with the content thereof? The word of the year for 2016 was "post-truth," and we are indeed in that era. This is not new analysis.
So, I have this idea about that: what if there was a dual-effect of the devaluation of the written word? This is confusing out of context - there requires an assumption: the written word has been devalued to a point where it is almost equivalent with speech. If this requires further explication, I can support it with ideas, but for now it seems necessary as a sort of theorem upon which we can build more complex analysis. Are you with me so far?
Historically, the reason that the written word carried so much weight is that it was incredibly *intentional.* You could not "accidentally" dip a goddamn feather into an inkwell and painstakingly mark your words upon a page that had no eraser, much less a fucking delete button. If you wrote it, it meant you had training. Education. You were of a certain social class that was the product of a lineage of tradition, most likely, and therefore were granted access to the tools of the elite. Again, this part may start to sound Marxist (not that I'm not to a very large degree, but it's irrelevant), but the idea is that words, when written, carried immense cultural weight in basically every society in which they existed. Until now.
Now, words are texted on smartphones and shot across keyboards in an instant-volley the likes of which might rival Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (a' la the Stoppard play, not the Shakespeare - and specifically the film, through which medium the rapidity and grace of their banter is finally accessible to the ear). Not now, really - it's just a good transition word - but for the past 20 years, really. We're two decades into the democratization of composition, and boy-the-fuck-howdy does it leave a mark!
(2/?)
>>9879749
FUCKING READ THINGS - the actual idea is below.
Kthx
https://youtu.be/WfNiQBXmPw8
So, Lord of the Flies is sexist now? WTF I love Lord of the Flies now.
>305
>101
>204
I don't get it, what are these supposed to mean? I don't have these in my country, I know they're increasingly more in depth but what separates 101 from 102 for example and what 10x from 20x?
>>9879558
think of it like a season of a show
>season3episode5
>season2episode1
ect.
>>9879569
Oh, alright.
Still what makes a "season" end and another begin? Is it just arbitrary depending on the teacher?
I'm 37 pages into this after finally giving in and I like it so far but what the FUCK is this Wardine shit
Had DFW ever actually met a black person before????
>>9879473
wardine be cry that you are so fucking stupid
>>9879473
wardine be cry man
wardine be cry
No but i didn't read that as Ebonics so much as i read it as the stream of consciousness of a young developmentally disabled person
Who is also probably black sure but i didn't assume that to be the cause of the writing style so much as them being poor and uneducated and probably kinda retarded.
>>9879481
Wartime be cry that her dialect would be so embarrassingly butchered, maybe