/lit/ confessions and pet peeves.
We all like to rant and groan, so here's a thread for it. Confess your sins.
I haven't read at least half of all the books I take part in discussing on /lit/.
Probably more, but at least half.
When reading a book, if I see a word not properly printed (maybe a fleck of ink is missing to make the word incomplete) or if I see the paper is a little blotchy, I need to run my finger over it. I assume it's something I need to check - whether the blotch can be rubbed away or if the ink is so bad it comes off from a little rub. It rarely makes a difference but I need to do this everytime I notice it.
>>9890811
You know, most of us can tell people like you haven't read the book you're trying to discuss.
I'm trying my goddamn best. Why do people like this book so much? Am I too dumb to understand it?
>reading this random shit instead of Dante, Leopardi, Mann, Mallarmé, Marinetti, Balzac, etc.
>>9890534
>Not realising Wolfe is superior to half of these
Haven't read it yet. Thinking of reading it though... is it worth it?
Redpill me on the book?
Solzhenitsyn was a nazi collaborator (he openly admits it) and was sent to the gulag (in the british army you'd be executed) for 7 years
most of his claims are unsourced, and he fails to mention how it were mostly communists who became the victims of stalin's regime
read ernest mandel's review of the gulag archipelago
>>9890557
This.
It's entirely bullshit. Don't read it.
If I wanted to resist giving myself into a political ideology and becoming resentful as the world itself fails to meet my newly inherited expectations, how do I go about living my life in an increasingly polarized world? It seems easy on paper, just ignore the things you don't like, but all this posturing about political violence and annoyingly disingenuous narrative building everywhere I look, even among my friends, just fills me with negative, destructive emotion. I can't even criticize the absoluteness of these things that bother me, because I'd effectively be taking a side and alienate others. In addition to feelings of nihilism and misanthropy, I sometimes end up hoping the opposite of what they want happens, which I imagine is how a lot of people end up getting radicalized.
I guess I'm looking for individualist philosophy or literature which deal with this dilemma, how to resist the influence of extremism.
The Forest-Walker, Junger
Eumeswil, Junger
Kierkegaard
Try Ayn Rand's Fountainhead.
I've personally been living a life of recluse. It just seems appropriate that I generally do not socialize.
>>9890211
Are you religious? Religion's quite good for this stuff. If it could see the poorest misers of all of human history through plagues, wars, famines and every other kind of disaster you can think of it probably stands a good chance at also being an effective treatment for '21st century bullshit fatigue' (we really need an officially recognized name for these feelings, it's getting entirely too common).
I hate everyone and everything most of the time but reading my favourite Catholic authors tends to make me feel a bit better for a little while. Chesterton, O'Connor and Wolfe I think are particularly good for this.
Who are some great australian writers? They can be pre or post independence
>>9890077
>australian
>great
Ok ok I get it, but whats the punchline?
>>9890077
Geoffrey Roberts, Robert Hughes, Nevil Shute, Manning Clark, Xavier Herbert, Michael Leunig, Bruce Dawes.
>>9890077
There isn't any, Richard Flanagan is okay and so is Tim Winton. Not great though. Also some Clarke guy, for the term of his natural life. But if you have no interest in convicts and stuff there isn't much on offer.
Skip
Humor = Tragedy + Distance
All humor has at its core a tragedy for someone, but that tragedy is made funny to the audience by their distance from the tragedy either physically (Watching someone else get hurt is funny, but if such pain had happen to the viewer it would not be funny) or temporally (9/11 jokes are quite funny to many Americans now when they wouldn't have been in 2001)
This applies to all humor and all tragedy.
Humor is tragic to those closest to it.
Tragedy is hilarious to those removed far enough from it.
>>9890041
why do i find pic related funny then big guy?
>>9890046
Because you're a sick fuck
Distance = Humor - Tragedy
All distance, all space, is the difference between something that's funny and something that's sad. If something is far away, that is because it is more funny than it is sad. If something is close, that is because sadness and funniness are nearly equal, you neither laugh or cry. That's why distant stars are hilarious, but your nipple is almost neutral.
ITT: /lit/ pics that make you go hmmmmmm
Don't know of a better place to ask this, but did anyone else have a serious change of heart about him after the end of his last video?
>>9889137
NEVER CROSS THE MEMES
>>9889155
Which video? The one where he attacks the journalist who called him "far right"?
>The perfect book cover doesn't exi-
>>9889060
is that painting the perfect cover for every book or something?
>>9889060
>The perfect book cover doesn't exi-
Yeah, it's called simple clothbound with a gilded etched title
Hey, /lit/.
What's up?
Read anything cool lately?
Cool is so last year, most interesting things are hot now.
>>9888940
No, i woke up at 8 am today and still haven't left the bed 12 and a half hours later
>>9888947
That's cool.
I mean, err...
Did you love it? Did you hate it? What would you rate it?
I was completely lost after about 50 pages
One of the greatest books in spanish language. 10/10. Masterful.
>>9888579
I loved it
What are your least favorite words, /lit/? Hopefully not because of definition, but because of sound or usage
Personally, I can't fucking stand "stinky," "sleuth," or "pamper."
amiable.
sleuth is a fucking great word
>>9888681
Hey
shut the fuck up
Do an impression of a writer, other's guess who its is
>How odd I can have all this inside of me, and to you it's just sperm
>>9888322
Burroughs
> Sentence fragments on a page.
>>9888322
>He spat.
>When I was introduced to him (in the sense that I was given the permission to witness his presence, by a man who is now dead and buried somewhere near Toledo, Spain) for the first time, the first thing I noticed was the elongated nature of his brindled face, and the yellow landscape I had seen many times in my other lifetimes.
Isn't the Übermensch itself the mythologizing Nietzsche warns of pursuing?
>>9888205
no
its the overcoming of the human, the all too human
>>9888205
Yes, read Stirner to get a coherent critique of putting things above yourself,
>>9888210
Beautifully said
Is anyone here actually a writer? I have a novel completed right now and my full manuscript is being reviewed by two literary agents and I've had a partial manuscript request from another.
So what are you all doing?
Am I a writer?
I dunno.
Do I like to write?
Yeah.
>>9887934
This.
>Am I writing short stories or a novel?
Yeah.
more than a dozen published short stories in both paper and digital formats, novel well on its way and I'm confident it'll be something worthwhile as I know what i'm doing.
/lit/ opinion about his books?
The Jaunt is his best work and it's like 2 pages long.
>>9887734
I think that Misery is best, or one of bests. This ending, for me 10/10
>>9887727
The man is a legend. He creates some of the most authentic characters I've encountered in literature.
Pet Semetary made me want to have children, oddly.