Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 365. page

>>9897983
I was a well-read Marxist with a Master's degree in philosophy, and I decided to read this book just to see how idiotic the far right is.
But today, I'm proud to call myself a white nationalist, who believes that Jews are at the root of all evil in the world. I realized that the liberal education I had been given was merely a mental straight jacket that insulated me from true redpilled knowledge about how the world really works. From there, I wen't to Hitler's Mein Kampf, I went to Schopenhauer's On Women, t to Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and continued until I was finally aware of how we are being duped by the Jews.
It's frightening how they're genociding us, but if we can only get this book into the hands of all of /lit/ that would be wonderful. We need to get the word out there. It's often talked about on /pol/, and if we can spread the book like we did the Jew "meme" pics then maybe we can elect a proper "anti-semite" instead kike Trump next time.
Do your duty to the white race and read it. I promise you that you will never regret it. The truth of it is so exalting through its sheer penetrative insights that it'll leave you gasping for more redpilled books.

>>9897983
ITS NAZI GARBAGE NEVER READ IT DONT WASTE TIME

>>9898359
but why?

>>9897668
The first sentence is just horrible. Second one is better, but feels like it should still be rewritten. As for your second question, I personally think if you want to show an accent vividly you have to write phonetically otherwise everyone speaks with a generic male or female voice

>>9897668

>In his thick southern drawl, accented distinctively by a semantic ignorance, he politely demanded, "Please, no tomatoes for me!" upon the offering of such an offensive fruit.

>>9897668
>>9897718

>In his thick southern drawl, distinctively accented by semantic ignorance, he politely demanded, "Please, no tomatoes for me, now!" upon being offered such a personally offensive fruit.

>>9897223
>Husserl was a naive Fregean/Platonic realist about entities
Where exactly did you read this?
>the difference between Husserl's constitutive faculty and Heidegger's disclosure
I rarely read philosophy in English so I'm not certain what you mean with these terms, if you're thinking of intentionality then there is virtually no difference (and in principle there cannot be any difference).

>>9897324
>Where exactly did you read this?

One of Dermot Moran's books. I'm reading both his general history of phenomenology and his Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology, so I can't remember which. But one of the questions that bothered me while reading, because I've never known the answer myself and he never answered it directly for several chapters, is whether Brentano, Frege, Russell, and others were as naive as they seem about logical realism. But Moran says pretty clearly, Logical Investigations era Husserl believed that metaphysical realities like the law of gravity were out there waiting to be grasped, whether any human has ever grasped them or not.

I don't mind that kind of realism in principle, like I'm not denying that gravity really exists in some sense of existence. But if he means that all human minds would grasp the truth of gravity in the same way, I start to get worried, because that implies not just that conceptual resources are identical across people and cultures, but that there is only one true form of conceptual adequacy to the real world. I don't mind that kind of naive epistemology in Einstein or even Mach, but in phenomenology it's pretty weird.

However, turns out he repudiated it later, according to Moran.

>if you're thinking of intentionality then there is virtually no difference
No I mean the disclosure of new ontological truth, as opposed to new ontical truth. The disclosure of new conditions of possibility (Bedingungen der Möglichkeit) altogether.

>>9897375
It is important to keep in mind that Husserl had kept changing his views as his philosophy developed. Generally speaking (if I remember correctly), his small book called "The idea of phenomenology" (I'm not sure if this translation is correct) is considered the turning point from early to late Husserl.
>but if he means that all human minds would grasp the truth of gravity in the same way, I start to get worried because that implies... that there is only one true form of conceptual adequacy to the world
But that is exactly what he means. The best example being how he attempts to prove the existence of other people after performing the Cartesian reduction (and consequently abandoning all knowledge). The gist of his argument is that I (in the 1st person) necessarily assume the existence of others on the basis of an analogy, i.e that there have to exist other conscious beings. In addition, after deriving others so to speak Husserl concludes that we all share the same world - the world that is available to me from the 1st person perspective.
>i mean the disclosure of new ontological truth
Husserl didn't write anything regarding ontology (as far as I know) - his phenomenology is entirely epistemological. I've read a clever thought in an introduction to S&Z that Heidegger's contribution to the Husserl's project is that he filled a void in Husserl's phenomenology by coming up with a phenomenological ontology, whereas Husserl was concerned exclusively with epistemology.

>>9896794
Its certainly Autistic. But I guess why not transform the most popular YA novel into a philosophical manifesto? Is there a better way to indoctrinate children?

Bad cover though, should have some harry potter looking character with just enough differences to avoid trademark infringement.

Also, I wonder if JKR knows about this and what she thinks about it.

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE geek-bait.

Idle distraction for anyone else.

>>9896794
>>>/lit/rules/1

we have literally 1 (one) rule fuckface

Jordan Peterson

Freud is highly accused of being a charlatan

>>9896768
Everybody since I am too stupid to counter anything anyone says.

>already infinitely resigned
woah dude only one more step!

>>9896667
If you have infinite faith in your infinite resignation, what does that make you?

Check-fucking-mate, Soren.

>>9896699
For Kierkegaard faith involves a leap across the absurd, there is nothing absurd about belieiving in the state you are currently in and so it is not really faith.

>>9896423
>girl you're dating recommends you a book
>you read on wikipedia that book is about the experiences of women
>"wow such le marxism wow omg sjw agenda wow i better double check this with my 4chan friends"

Why don't you just fucking read it and see if it's good, you fucking loser? christ. i hope she figures out what a disingenuous shrew little autist you are before it's too late.

be a real fucking person think for yourself

>>9896444
fpbp

>>9896444
>how do you know it's shit, it's not even out yet

i mean it was written by a punk for punks about hardcore/punk. what you expect famalam?

>>9896143
RIP D.Boon

But is about fucking him?
that is important

Need help finding a book I read a while ago. It was a fantasy novel with a young boy as the main character. Everyone seems to like him yet views him as a kind of cursed child. His love interest is the baron's daughter whose father accidentally sells out the whole town to a raider pretending to be a soldier. I don't remember much after that.
Also OP, I always figured that she meant he was weak willed and incapable of being enraged.

>>9896030
Alive to outrage in the sense that he isn't fighting back for what is (now) his like he's supposed to.
She's saying Paris is a coward basically.

>>9896030
She's saying she don't want no scrub

always want to but im too scared
do you? if so, where from?

>>9896040
which country you live in?

>>9896044
Vatican

>>9895946
I'd go for the first. But you should also look into Kevin McDonald's Culture of Critique Series if you want to become more wellrounded intellectually

>>9895946
Get the Sping Books edition.

>>9895959
spring*

>>9895819
>and why is it "To Have and Have Not"?
You tell me, I've seen in a few places it's his worst, but I don't know why, I never read it.

File: MV5BMT.jpg (138KB, 326x500px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 326x500px

>>9895819
Redeemed for spawning one of the best noir films evar.

>>9898067
Not that great a film desu senpai

The Greeks

>>9895692
The Greeks

>>9895692
Fuck off gay shit

GUESS WHERE?

FROM THE MOTHERFUCKING MEMES YOU LITTLE FAGGOT

I put a fan under my desk pointing up at me and it's airing out my balls

>>9895688
Unironically Stirner.

Mein Kampf

>>9895579
Culture of Critique Series by MacDonald

>>9895579
Just one:

Ulysses and Us: The Art of Everyday Living
by Declan Kiberd

you read a chapter of Ulysses, then you read a chapter of that book.

simple.