/lit/, I have a compulsion to buy books. Don't get me wrong, I read them, but I end up buying and my backlog is huge.
tfw genuienly tried to stop but i keep buying more books
>>8171980
picture of my backlog from a week ago
about 3 more books have been added
Pff, me too. I still need to finish 5 more books before I'm "allowed" to buy another and while I read a lot, I read everything BUT the books here brought last.
I also have this problem
I think it stems from a desire to have a big ass lobrary to loan shit to anyone who coukd use it
did I get the best possible poetry compilations? I got the norton anthology of poetry and the norton anthology of modern poetry, as well as "poems for the millennium" volumes 1-3. It's like, I wanna find new poetry, but I'm also hoping that there's gonna be some cool badass poetry in here besides just some boring shit that talks about god and love and shit. I have high hopes for the norton modern and volumes 1-3 of the poems for the millennium (especially the dadaist part). There isn't like, some ultra badass compilation of poetry that I could have gotten right? I'm a fudge packin crack smokin satan worshippin motherfucker okay I don't really smoke crack or worship satan or fuck my mom but I am like really outside of the norm xD You don't know me shut up!!! SHUT UP!!! I SAID SHUT UP YOU BITCH!!! WOOOOAAAAAAA!!! HUH HUH HUH HUH UH HUH HUH HUH HUH HUH WOOOOOOOAAAAAAA
Just listen to trap rap
>>8171953
You probably won't even read 90% of the poems you just bought.
>>8172665
Probably not, but I will read the ones that I find most interesting, and sample a little of each author, as I was doing this morning. I gotta say, the old stuff in the norton anthology of poetry is really fucking difficult to understand. Hopefully the newer poetry will be less epically vague and I can get some sort of sense of what I'm reading from it.
ITT: We pretend this is not 4chan, converse politely and intellectually as we do in real life. Be a gentleman.
>>8171891
sage faggot
>>8171891
fuck you nigger
build the wall, you faggot kike
FREEbook thread.
Willing to take requests on ww2 diaries of which i have quite a lot in pdf format from anyone who can provide me with Three New Deals from Wolfgang Schivelbusch.
Have you got Junger's "On Pain" or Speer's "Spandau diaries"?
>>8171895
Also Ernst Von Solomans "The Outlaws"
>>8171895
have got Spandau, sadly not junger
What was his problem?
>>8171867
He was a faggot and a failure. He put his feelings on a paper so other faggots and failures could relate to someone.
>>8171867
AIDS
his repressed faggorty.
How to put Roman traits in a corporation or government in a cyberpunk novel?
If you'd researched Rome you wouldn't need to ask this
for what purpose
>>8171807
Don't need to be condescending, /lit/
seriously, what's yalls problem? why can't you fucking talk to each other like people and why is it a fad to call people autists? be cool man, jeez
|CUMMIE| /FOR/ |MUMMY|
>>8171788
Thou art one of simple mind.
>>8171794
Thou art one of simple mind
;)
This is a selection from a word frequency list.
I've removed the connective words like "the" and "is," as well as the most culturally unique words.
Can you guess what the original work was?
>>8171694
Something McCarthy?
Would seem typical of genre garbage
Hey /lit/,
I have a problem and maybe you'll have a new perspective or two to share with me.
Basically, I want to write a short story that covers a niche of our society. And I want to say, a niche, nothing more. This is not the WHOLE world and this is not HOW THINGS REALLY ARE, it's just a slit of society I have been watching lately.
Now, my linkage is wrong, but it may be very representative, thatswhy I took it.
Here it goes: Mass shooters and other extrem societal deviants (always MEN*) are always seen as monsters, but society never admits how men, unlike women, are thrown to the grinder. Some get on top, some turn out monsters, all suffer.
Now I've based this assumption on a simple yet scary premise of »boys dont cry«. From the start, in order to get people/citizens to go to war, to do hard work, to even take pride in harsh shit they have to put up with is an emotional encripplement. While girls are seen as ones who can cry and express feelings, who are guarded by society (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlFAd4YdQks), men are thrown to the wolves.
Now I«m trying to write a short story and I tried a few times and have always failed. In every writing, I have fallen into two traps: (MALE)Character is either percieved as complete monster OR he is reduced to a child(suffering was not done to a boy but to a child. Could be a girl, too).
So. A story where man is crippled because he was a boy-child. Got any ideas how to approach it?
*society deems them as Always men. You'll find male shooters all over google, while female will be like a note in wikipedia.
oh god
You're not writer.
Is Dostoevsky good?
>>8171568
It depends, for me sometimes it's a little slow.
Depends. If you're reading for plot, no.
If your reading for characters and reflection, he's one of the best.
>>8171568
Dislike him. A cheap sensationalist, clumsy and vulgar. A prophet, a claptrap journalist and a slapdash comedian. Some of his scenes are extraordinarily amusing. Nobody takes his reactionary journalism seriously.
All you need is here.
>>8171560
Does it contain info about the goddess Kali?
I know this will sound silly, but I saw her during meditation once despite not knowing anything about her (not even her name) at the time. She had bigger boobs in my vision, but that was probably my imagination working overtime. In any case, she's far more interesting than I expected (>muh silly animal gods), she sits on a dude, is topless, holds swords and skulls and decapitated heads. You may spin it any way you want (personification of becoming and the falsehood of identity, etc.), she'll always be the goddess of fucking and killing to me, even when it's destruction of self-identities or narcissistic enjoyment.
>>8171560
"Through the study of the scriptures alone or with erudition one can not realize the Atman, and even through the intellectualism and the debates in the classroom"
(Katha Upanishad, I, II, 23)
"The wise man, having studied the treaties of religious and secular knowledge, completely abandon these treaties, as one who looking for the seed leaves the rind"
(Brahmabindù Upanishads, 18)
"All that you have studied is but a set of words" (Chandogya Upanishad, VII, I, 3)
"In a frightening darkness enter those who live in ignorance, and in an even worse darkness those who have only a theoretical knowledge" (Svetasvara Upanishad, IV, IV, 10).
Why even read, /lit/? Don't you realise reading is useless?
>>8171591
>I know this will sound silly, but I saw her during meditation once despite not knowing anything about her (not even her name) at the time. She had bigger boobs in my vision
it reminds me...
>In June 2012, some Hindu leaders became upset at the inclusion of several Hindu gods in Smite and the fact that they are player-controlled. The deities that were in question were Kali, Agni, and Vamana, and there was particular opposition to how Kali was dressed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smite_(video_game)#Depiction_of_Hindu_gods_controversy
Should I read Nietzsche in any particular order?
I'm aware that Nietzsche can easily be misinterpreted and I don't want to fall into the usual pitfalls people make when reading his works directly.
Are there any other philosophers I need to know to read him? I've read the Greeks (pre-Socratics, Plato, Aristotle), Spinoza and Schopenhauer so far.
My former philosophy professor told me that Beyond Good and Evil is the best place to start, while Thus Spoke Zarathustra can be rather vague.
https://www.amazon.com/Portable-Nietzsche-Library/dp/0140150625
BGE full text when you get to it
Geneology full text too
>>8171553
Nietzs he recommended reading all his texts in order. BGE isn't his best work despite being well known. Maybe, if you don't want to take the chronological route, start with Twilight of the Idols? It's an older text, but it's like a summary of his ideas and it's short and rather accessible if you have the right mindset (not screaming "muh arguments, p > q motherfucker!" every sentence for instance).
>>8171630
Anyone who obsesses over muh arguments will never make it into any of his books, when reading the N-God you must understand that he thought that whether something was true or not wasn't the key thing to be concerned with.
Which version of the bible would you recommend me to read and why?
>>8171398
KJV unless you happen to know how to read Hebrew and Greek and are allowed access to the original texts.
the Koran.
>>8171398
KJV with a good critical apparatus, unless you have Latin/Greek/Hebrew, in which case the Vulgate/original NT/original OT respectively
>that that
>had had
There's nothing wrong with had had. I can't remember seeing a that that anywhere though.
>>8171392
James and John, who are required by an English test to describe a man who, in the past, had suffered from a cold. John writes "The man had a cold," which the teacher marks as being incorrect.
James, while John had had "had"; had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.
English truly is the best.
>>8171397
You don't think that "that that" ever occurs? I don't quite agree that that is the case.
>Started reading Gravity's Rainbow
>About 200 pages in
>Have to pretty much just power through a lot of the time and accept that I don't fully grasp everything that's going on. I usually figure things out after a few pages, though.
>Lately feel like I don't grasp any of the things I read the way I used to.
>Feel like my focus is leaving me and I'm getting stupider
Anyone else have the same thing happen?
What do?
Once you get to Part 3, it gets easier and he actually sticks to somewhat coherent storytelling. Also remember it's all a meme :^)
>>8171379
It's good to take notes as you go along, it makes it a lot easier avoiding the red herrings later on in the book
Pynchons my fav writer for sure because my fav thing in books is goofs, gags, jokes and rambunctious behavior, and his books are full to the brim of it. Every novel is like one of those novelty snake cans, you open the book & POP you get a face fulla snakes and you fall back cackling. The mad mind, the crack genius, to do it! and then you think hmmm whats he gonna do next, this trickster, and you pick the book back up and BZZZZZZZZZZ you get a shock and Hahahahahah you've been pranked again by the old pynchmeister, that card. "Did that Pynch?" he says, laughing yukyukyukyuk. Watch him as he shoves a pair of plastic buck teeth right up into his mouth and displays em for you- left, right, center- "you like dese? Do i look handsome???" Pulls out a mirror. "Ah!" Hand to naughty mouth. And you're on your ass again laughing as he snaps his suspenders, exits stage right, and appears again hauling a huge golden gong.