This thread is to ask for the best translation for foreign texts.
I'd like to ask what is the best translation for Politics by Aristotle.
>>8252793
Lol
What are the best translations for ANY Spanish work? Any suggestions appreciated, preferably anything by Juan Rulfo.
>>8252863
For Borges, it's Norman Thomas di Giovanni. He worked with Borges personally, who was conversant in English enough to evaluate the translation work. Unfortunately there is an issue with the estate (that largely amounts to a personal conflict with widow Maria Kodama), so the work is hard to come by. It was only briefly in print if ever, but it's available online with some resourcefulness. Barring that, the original translations (by Anthony Kerrigan, James Irby, and so on) are also quite good. The work of Andrew Hurley is deeply idiosyncratic (and commissioned by Kodama to spite di Giovanni) and is to be avoided. (Sadly this is the translation in the otherwise-attractive Collected Fiction and Collected Non-Fiction.)
Why do normals pretend that 500 pages is a 'long' book?
Literally one evening of reading.
>>8252534
You can finish that in three days, two if you push it at 200-300 on the first evening
>>8252534
Literally bait (which I just literally bit).
The thing is there are few 500+ pages books worth reading
What are some good horror tragedy books? Something psychological and sad
the haunting of hill house is exactly what you're looking for
>>8252266
Story of O by Anne Desclos maybe? Not exactly horror but it definitely gives you strange feels.
Holy FUCK! I read 3 and a half pagss of the preface, and I feel I sufficiantly understand the concepts (in their vagueness and abstraction), but I just feel so overwhelmed by the thought of diving into this enormous book. It arrived in the mail today and I felt it's weight in my hands and it's thickness, I spent some time just getting through each paragraph, where I was constantly stopping and re-reading sentences because I felt I hadn't caught the meaning (ironic I'm talking about meaning, right? Ho ho ho ho ho ho). Lit...
honestly i tried to keep up with the maths in the first couple of chapters and eventually ending up just skimming it and reading the dialogues which were super well done as a classicalfag familiar with all the shit bach does in a musical offering
>>8252253
It's an obfuscation of undergraduate automata theory with some cool references posing as a theory of consciousness.
I read it and liked it enough
But i wondered how any of it was useful
Post tip-top-tier literature from your country
I'll start:
Uuni, by Antti Hyry, Finland
Canada
Leacock - Sunshine Sketches of a Small Town
Carson - Autobiography of Red
That's it.
China:
None.
Does any notable thinker actually promote nationalism?
For me, it seems like one of the biggest spook that is growing, festering on the sheeples for populism and increasing the conformaty. When will man finally evolve into the self-actualized wonder we have the capacity to become?
Do we really need a nation? The nation is just a glorification of the state, a pride in something/someone other than yourself, which in my opinion is one of the biggest illusions one can have.
What does /lit/ think?
>>8251949
>The nation is just a glorification of the state
It can be, but in many cases it is a glorification of culture.
Besides, you only know what you've lost when it's gone forever, so be careful what you wish for.
I think internationalism makes political sense as a form of co-operation, but I don't think that nation states should be destroyed, because national sovereignity keeps supra-national institutions from becoming too powerful if you ask me.
Nationalism or any idea that one culture is better than another is pure horseshit that only completely ignorant adults and mentally inept edgy teens on 4chan subscribe to
>>8251977
Culture should be cheerished, but it should not be associated as a political power like it is today. Culture and power should have nothing to do with each others.
Wether the state should exists or not is a different topic. Globalism isn't something i promote either though.
What writer comes to mind when you see this painting?
>>8251927
Kierkegaard or Nietzsche because of this website.
>>8251927
Strindberg.
whoever wrote casper the friendly ghost
JR is back in print!
>>8251499
fuck off. seriously?
>>8251527
oh shit.
he's not lying.
>>8251499
Two words:meme magic
So what's this board about?
Not sure
It's about proving how much better you are than everyone with your obscure tastes. I am the only person to read the naughty poem jesus wrote on his sandals.
text based waifus, the purest kind of waifu
Which one should I read first?
>>8250630
Catch 22 then Moby Dick, Catch 22 is a lot easier to get into. Don't bother reading Brave New World.
Bottom to top
Why the fuck are you posting this again?
Does free will exist, or is it merely an illusion that arises from brain phenomena?
http://www.strawpoll.me/10685773
>>8250619
I've seen a wild rabbit napping in the sun
>>8250619
Why can't free will be a product of brain phenomena? I can't help but think the whole debate is just a game of semantics.
>>8250637
You are overlooking the illusion part.
What's the point of "Young adult" literature? When I was a kid I went from kid's books to just reading "Grown up" books. Mostly in science fiction or fantasy. I never really set foot into "Young adult"
What's your experience with it? It just strikes me as weird. Like, the authors don't want to write kid's books but they're also not good enough to write "adult books" either. Somehow that's worse to me than just writing kid's books
>>8250515
It's for normie manchildren who want to feel sophisticated for being "readers" but don't actually like reading.
I thought it was books written by teenagers for teenagers
It's for big dum dums
After finishing Moby-Dick I became a full-blown prosefag. I'm still a pretty new reader, but what should I read next?
>>8250366
jesus christ what a woman. name for this sperm worm?
Nothing else will come close to Moby-Dick.
The Border Trilogy, if you love prose
>and tortillas
reminder he didnt start with the greeks
He literally did though
He was a professor of classics whose first book was about Greek tragedy
>start
>when Herakleitos your main man
kekekekekekekekeke
I feel like I have a concrete understanding of existentialism, and I want to move onto another branch of philosophy. I was directed toward phenomenology so I decided that existential phenomenology should be a good introduction for me. I purchased Being and Time today and I plan on reading it, but I'm interested to hear what /lit/ thinks about Hedeigger, Being and Time, and phenomenology in general.
>>8250153
So, you've dabbled in existentialist philosophy, and now you're going to Heidegger? Who on earth recommended that you should do that?
What are you asking?
>>8250153
Heidegger is incredible, I'm also reading being and time.
It's far more dense and "real" philosophy (a la Kant) than any of the main existentialist guys though, so be ready for metaphysics.
In fact, I highly recommend you go through his short essay "What is Metaphysics" before you begin Being and Time.