How would a Dystopian Utopia and Utopian Dystopia settings look like?
Those words are antonyms.
>>8263375
Dystopian Utopia is the Utopia gone wrong, Utopian Dystopia is the Dystopia gone wrong/right (I guess this depends on your perspective desu).
>>8263466
>he can't into dialectics
>tfw slowly losing the will to keep working on your book
How do I escape this slump?
>>8263361
Take a break, it's not like you have any deadlines you have to meet
>>8263361
"Been working way too much need to get out and get fucked up
Whats going on, where's it at
Make some calls to make it crack, lets see...
I need money, drugs, a ride
And a spot with hot ones inside"
Ever try thinking for yourself? I know it's an alien concept but trust me you should try it.
Is there a single novel that does timetravel right?
I have a friend who believes that one of the reason videogames are an artistic medium is because it is the first medium that told a good time-travel story, and was successful in doing so because of the interactive nature of the story. Is he right?
>>8263358
depends on what you mean by "doing timetravel right"
>>8263388
Timetravel tales that aren't inconsistent, paradoxical, and also shit.
I agree, Undertale is the first story to do time travel right.
What is your opinion on Norwegian Wood?
Recommend realistic decent books about love and relationships. I'm dreaming about having a gf
It's shit.
>>8263340
Sure if you're a gf-less NEET this will make your peepee hard
The main character doesn't do anything and is utterly uninteresting but gets QTs throughout the whole book
Read it when I was 20 and sexually inexperienced. Was feelsy and the writing was Murakami, which I like. I am not nor have I ever been patrician. I don't think I've read any other books about love and relationships, at least not directly.
Which novels feel like consuming a Pepsi™ cola and a hamburger at night in a fast food place while watching the world pass by? Possibly with fries?
Other than Haruki Murakami, of course. Thanks.
>>8263276
Banal contemporary realism. Pick pretty much any literary fiction book from the past year.
>>8263276
Raymond Carver?
>>8263276
Bright Lights, Big City
Who is it?
>>8263127
Yikes. I haven't read Tao Lin before but Jonathan Franzen is one of the worst writers I've ever read.
>>8263150
The Corrections is actually a good book.
>>8263150
Agreed, The Corrections is one of the worst novels I've ever read.
I love old noir and hardboiled films. Are there any novels which similar vibes? I enjoy the early-mid 20th century aesthetic
>>8263104
The Big Sleep, or anything by Raymond Chandler.
The Maltese Falcon.
>>8263104
The Postman Always Rings Twice
although I don't doubt you've seen the movie, id still recommend reading it.
>>8263104
You could easily Google for books.
Never been to /lit/ before but I'm 45% of the way through this and it's blowing my mind.
>>8263057
someones gonna tell you your taste sucks just because you're new
>>8263057
Dislike him. A cheap sensationalist, clumsy and vulgar. A prophet, a claptrap journalist and a slapdash comedian. Some of his scenes are extraordinarily amusing. Nobody takes his reactionary journalism seriously.
>>8263091
it's ok. I don't have much experience with classic lit. I'm just happy I decided to take the plunge with this one.
Will I be able to enjoy this book or is there too many old world ponds and English metaphors that'll go over my head?
I'm going to read it anyways, any suggestions for preparation. Oh and go fuck yourself
>>8263049
>>8263049
It's literally a book written for children. For your sake I hope you don't have any trouble reading it.
>>8263049
if your post is illustrative of your grasp of english then i suspect any english text would be difficult for you
also just get a copy of the annotated alice and you go fuck yourself too
If the Targaryens are immune to fire, why did Dany's grandfather burn to death? Or is it just that she's immune to it?
They're not immune to fire retard
>>8263001
>Immune to fire
Fucking moron showfag, they have a tendency to resist fire but aren't completely immune to it.
>>8263001
Targaryens used to be fireproof, but now it's a lost trait--or was until Dany, either because a) she's a genetic throwback or b) magic has woken up in the world. Probably a combo of the two. Several Targaryens have burned trying to prove they had the right stuff.
Is perception really reality?
>>8262829
wow, such pepe. much rare
Probably not but it's all you'll ever know so may as well treat it as such
Doesn't her story confirm that women love domineering, aggressive and virile men?
>>8262764
>Women tend to be attracted to masculinity, more at 11
>>8262766
>implying Healthcliff's brutish, emotional nature is 'masculine'
>>8262769
>implying it's feminine
re-reading moby dick. ishmael just got to the place in nantucket with the dank ass chowder. made me mad hungry so i ordered ramen. what other books have good food descriptions/make you hungry?
>>8262727
Game of Thrones has very detailed descriptions of every single banquet.
>>8262727
Joyce.
>>8262727
Dream of the Red Mansions
Help me, my prose is pretentious as fuck. It's just how it comes out. Is this something I should fix? It seriously comes out like some 19th century dickbag.
Just think more consciously about the tone you want to take. Everyone has that "phase" where they write in the way they think actual writing sounds, just practice.
don't write stuff and you'll be okay
>>8262664
Write down the "truth" in the clearest way possible , like you're talking to a third grader.
If you still think your shit is interesting after that, then start playing around.
>why yes, I believe that those interested the humanities should be forced to study the hard sciences! No more uneducated writers and philosophers, and furthermore they must engage in manual labour! Thus we will produce truly well-rounded men of wisdom and knowledge.
Is my fedora ironic? We will never know.
>>8262630
I believe everybody wishing to study at the tertiary level should be forced to take a year in math, logic and philosophy. The essential problem with humanities these days is the lack of rigour, which comes from a lack of understanding of anything having to do with proper reasoning or epistemology etc.
I believe that waiters should tip customers who make less than them
>>8262630