so do we take this shit literally or not?
allowing non-clergy to read the bible ended civilization so stop
Some parts are obviously literal, some parts are obviously figurtive, some parts are obviously mystical. And some aren't obvious in which they are, but we have plenty of ancient saints to explain them to us.
>>9931932
Non clergy were always allowed and urged to read Scripture in the east.
Do you take the library literally?
>Any poet worth his salt can write prose. But not all prose writers can write poetry.
Oh fuck. W-was he right?
>>9931702
Poetry is for faggots anyway
>>9931702
of course, poetry is literally held to a higher standard
I've had an argument about a single punctuation mark before
>>9931714
>of course, poetry is literally held to a higher standard
Hardly, its way waaaay easier to get away with being a mediocre poet than a mediocre writer especially these days.
>I've had an argument about a single punctuation mark before
Oh never mind I'm talking with one
Seriously, where the fuck do I start? What are the first five books to read and in what order?
Genesis, Exodus, Numbers, Leviticus, The Recognitions
>>9931598
Just read Mein Kampf
>>9931598
Start with the bible
Is literature a hobby for only high IQ people?
>>9931183
For some, sure.
There's bad literature, too, though. I find that women read more than anyone I know, and they all read trash.
>>9931192
>not having a girlfriend who's a Proust scholar
kek
Anyone else find that ol' Melville drags it on a bit at times? I mean, he had an entire chapter dedicated to the color white.
That's one of the best chapters.
I'd be happy if he stretched it twice as long.
I think the entire purpose of the book is to drag on.
Shut the fuck up
What is /lit/s opinion on deckle edged books?
Just got this beautiful son of a bitch and it feels really good
dislike, it's a distraction and i don't understand the appeal
are they trying to make the book appear less mass-produced then it is?
Some spergs on this board complain about how they can't grip the pages well or something. I don't have an issue with it besides it being completely unnecessary.
I don't like it. I like clean, smooth edges.
Joyce is the cancer
Beckett is the answer
based
>>9930767
Anyone who thinks Post-Modernism is degeneracy and Modernism was more respectful to Western Civilization needs to read Beckett
>>9930783
Challenge accepted, which book?
>Uni Lit department releases list of "Recommended POC authors."
>Includes Homer, Plato, Sappho and Virgil
But these are the worst white males of the lot
>king of homos releases a fat poo
>it has OP's sperm on it
>>9930594
>Sappho
>male
Pick one
What are some good books about serial killers or crime?
In Cold Blood
>>9930457
La Bas!
Sort of.
I'm a fan of this type of writing, but I get freaked out easily. Makes me start thinking everyone is a serial killer. Good thing I keep my phone handy.
huey lewis and the news
Popular threads on /lit/ right now
>Books about curbstomping liberals, nu-women, celebs, and jews?
>Did the Holocaust really happen? Even Peterson thinks Hitler was satan
>What was meant by this /lit/? Is it true that people should stop reading white males authors?
>I took a Chicano Studies class to raise my GPA and "because of the recent tragedy at Charlottesville" I have to write a 5 page essay on this book.
>[Marx thread]Uhhhh, look at me! I'm a massive faggot! Uhhhh, seize the means of production!
>If America is the culmination of Western white civilization, as everyone from the Left to the Right declares, then there must be something terribly wrong with Western white...
>PREACH SISTER! Don't you just *hate* neurotic white male writers /lit/?
>what are the best books on gender studies?
Are there any books about this phenomenon? About people actively seeking out things on social media to get outraged about? Or about people who all agree on something -- e.g. the inferiority of other races, or women, or how dumb liberals are, which 4chan ostensibly does -- but nevertheless feel the compulsion to endlessly regurgitate the same stuff either by indulging in clickbait articles, falseflagging, etc.?
To me, it seems like the most inane thing imaginable, so I'd like to understand the psychology. You see the same thing when you go to /pol/ and, I'm sure, it's left-wing equivalent: people who go to great lengths to create an strawmanned Other but still incessantly have to keep reminding themselves to keep fanning the flame or reducing the perceived evil Other to a charicatured ideological figure. Same for, say, /r9k/ and how everything revolves around female inferiority, etc.
I genuinely want to understand the workings of such a mentality, so I would love some recommendations. It's such a weird phenomenon. I'm sure ressentiment is a huge part of it.
And before people feel butthurt, we can all agree that this also happens on other sites, with different political leanings. I merely want to read about something that I find so weird when I browse this particular site, i.e. people who purport to be convinced of something, but nevertheless have to keep reminding themselves by actively seeking out things to get outraged about.
>>9930260
When the mainstream discourse is completely dominated by one perspective then people will find other outlets to complain. Academia and media are so heavily leftwing that people go to anime forums to blow off steam.
>>9930268
Please don't post trash.
Why does Peterson never mention Stirner?
Is he too incompatible with his philosophy?
Abolish Bill C-16, PLEASE!
Because Stirner exposed the ideas of religion, tradition and morality Peterson desperately struggles to find justification for as the meaningless spooks they are.
Stiner BTFO'd that spooked out hack Peterson a hundred years before he was even born.
>>9929741
Because Stirner falls into the category of games which are easy to play, according to Peterson. Just call everything a spook and you suddenly don't have to justify anything you do. You are good to go. You don't need excuses and you are letting yourself stay unsorted because lmao dude spook who cares. It's not healthy to think of fundamental things as meaningless.
Holy fuck why is Greek History so hard to read? Its like I'm reading a bunch of bullshit bedtime story you tell some kid. Like what the fuck, did these people document anything worthwhile or is it just a buncha made up bullshit like sailing and fighting sea monsters and killing snake women?
If this isn't a fucking joke, then congratulations on taking babby's first step to understanding how history was once written and how it's progressed since then. How do you think you even got to the point of believing that history should be factual and useful and backed up by evidence? Because these guys stumbled around in the dark for your sorry ass 2400 years ago and invented a genre of writing just so you could whine about some of the greatest writers of all time not catering exactly to your expectations thousands of years later.
>>9929739
Oh come on. You're telling me these schizophrenic freaks wrote about monsters and gods as an actual depiction of life back then? Like they genuinely believed a minotaur guarded their buildings? No way, either the Greeks were a buncha liars hyping their own bullshit or people found some fiction and somehow interpreted it as fact. Like how people from the future are gonna discover books like 1984 and believe that's how it really was.
>>9929724
Maybe finish Herodotus and move on to Thucydides.
My girlfriend broke up with me recently, and its pretty much devastated me. I've come across some money recently, and I've decided to finish this semester and then go live in seclusion for a while. I'm thinking a nice quiet, preferably not too expensive mountain town where I can focus on walking and hiking and writing.
Suggestions?
do not fall off cliffs
Aww sage that's really sage rough sage I hope sage that everything sage works out :(
>>9929536
>its pretty much devastated me
Haha faggot.
Learn to not be emotionally dependent on others.
>age
>location
>current book you're reading and how do you like it
>22
>Washington D.C.
>The Sea is My Brother-Kerouac
Actually really like this. Big fan of On the Road and Big Sur so I was interested in this "lost novel." It was a pretty early work so I didn't expect it to be great. It's not on the level of his other stuff, but better than expected, and interesting to see a sort of beginning level of his style.
>>9929472
>age
23
>location
Pakistan
>current book you're reading and how do you like it
Gulag Archipelago. It's just my type of lit.
>>9929488
Also I forgot to add; I love stories set at sea/on ships etc. If any recommendations let me know, though I have read Moby Dick
why does /lit hate this again?
1. Not as good as We
2. Box of spiders was lame
3. Not as edgy or relevant as BNW
4. Orwell was a pseud
It's popular
>>9929407
Orwell fought in the international brigades against Franco. He insisted that he disagreed with totalitarians yet still clung to marxism as if there was a chance it could create a benevolent, fair society. Therefore, he was a naive dingus.