>when literature -- culture, really: music, art, filmand anime-- just keeps getting better the more you engage with it
>when each experience rubs some form of wisdom on you and you have a larger accumulation of context with which to engage every following experience
anyone else get these feels?
>>8296398
i have a notebook where i shit out some stupid ideas every now and then and i wrote down that exact same concept or whatever like a month ago, it's a great feeling
>>8297229
(it's the bottom paragraphs for both pages)
>>8297229
Nice diary. Would read
Hello /lit/. I'm a 18yo that failed out of high school, I'll be retaking my exams next year. I always found writing to be a daunting task, but how do I improve and get good at it? Are there any textbooks?
Your writing is shit because you don't read.
If you want to write read classics.
Otherwise it'll be shit.
Start with the Greeks.
>>8296534
This is good advice. And Aristotle even has a bunch of guides on writing and that.
How seriously do academic historians take Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals?
>>8296313
It's not really writen as a true history. It's a story that helps you understand worldviews and the sentiments and conditions which create them.
>>8296313
is that wonder woman
>>8296331
It's meant to be a history of the conditions that created Christian morality, as well as the conditions that created the morality it replaced.
As someone who's already read Bartleby, Typee, Benito, Billy, Moby, Mardi and I've got The Confidence-Man queued up, I'm wondering: are all of Melville's works (at least, the ones I haven't read yet) worth the time? I read Typee as a youth because my english teacher told me I'd enjoy it saying, "you'll like where it will take you." I've heard Omoo is basically a rehash of the first, and that Redburn and White-Jacket—while being more mature works—aren't on the same level as even Mardi or his novellas.
How did you get into Melville? Did you stop at Moby Dick or keep going? Bartleby, Benito or Billy: which is your favourite?
>>8296282
I got into him with Moby Dick, and stopped after that, though Moby Dick was amazing. Is some of his other work on the same level?
>>8296282
I kept going. So far, I've read Moby-Dick, Pierre, Clarel, The Confidence-Man, and Bartleby. His prose is god-tier and his stories like Pierre and The Confidence-Man have an experimental and modernist feel to them. Moby-Dick is still his best, even though Pierre comes close—funny, tragic, weird as fuck.
Don't force yourself through his oeuvre, but at least give it a chance. The Confidence-Man is great; Melville is in complete control and really fucks with you.
I've read Moby Dick and Bartleby. I thought Bartleby was really good, but not "amazing." Moby Dick is by far my favorite book.
Who is the final boss of literature?
>thatsnothowtheforceworks.gif
Seus
David Foster Wallace
tl;dr I cannot write my essay (semniotic analysis of song lyrics) and I am losing mental stability over it. HELP. PLEASE.
I'm doing a semniotic analysis of Empire Ants - Gorillaz. Specifically the lyrical content. This is a plea for someone to shed some light on how to approach this.
I can interpret what the lyrical content is saying but I am actually at my wits-fucking-end on how to analyse this and make it into a sensible, cohesively structured essay that discusses metaphorical meanings and deconstructs signifers and the signified.
WHAT THE ACTUAL MOTHER-FUCK I AM LOSING IT. I DON'T GET WHY THIS IS SO GOD DAMNED HARD. FUCK!!!
>>8296254
semniotic? did you mean semiotic? you did spell it as semniotic twice so I assume it can't be a mistake...
Wow... I've said and written 'semniotic' since first being put onto this assignment... gross misunderstanding on my part... I never even once noticed google correcting me. You've already shaken the foundations of this for me. Thank you anon.
>>8296337
You ignorant pleb, thou shall study, semniotic bastard. Have you ever read a book in your entire life, fucker?
Where to start with Dostoyevsky?
>>8296106
the notes from brothers karenina
the greeks
>>8296106
Crime and Punishment
The Idiot
Brothers Karamazov
Shorter stories
Demons and The Possessed if you want more
i have become deeply cynical, disturbed and jaded. everything nice seems naive, irrational or deluded.
im not claiming to be the ultimate rational thinker, but within my thoughts i cannot find where i am wrong. but the thought of going to a state of knowingly-irrational complacency is even more depressing than my current state. at least being sad identifies that things are bad.
"a critique of pure reason" has an attractive title to me for this reason but i am no philosopher and havent ever read philosophy
is this the wrong book to read for insight on this
is this worth reading or should i just stop being a colossal faggot
i didn't read any of this but you are gay
Wew, lad.
The book definitely has nothing to do with what you think it does.
How could Epictetusian stoicism and Nietzschean aestheticism be philosophically rectified
How about you start thinking about it.
>>8295954
by defining "Rectification" as the process elaborated in/undertaken by their works.
ism cannot be rectified. they can only influence better new ways, that will eventually get fixed in new isms.
I really wanna learn French so I don't have to rely on translations for a lot of things I read. Have ny of you tried Rosetta Stone? Does it work?
What have you tried?
(sorry i'm drunk posting)
Duolingo. Currently at 40% and I feel like it works. I'm slowly starting to get pretty good at French.
Just do a couple of levels every day.
Once I finish the Duolingo course i'll go onto something more technical i.e. textbooks.
>>8295976
Seconding this. There's nothing like immersion, and so once you have finished learning the basics of grammar and vocab, try reading one of your favorite (simple) books in French. Then try some French films.
>>8295952
l'école... j'y suis allé
I once read a book for english class in high school called 'Jasper Jones'
Despit being boring and badly written, the author awkwardly shoehorned in references to books like Moby Dick and To Kill a Mockingbird so that the reader knew how smart he was
And that isn't even mentioning the obvious main character self insert
>>8295932
Are you by any chance Australian
>>8295965
Fuck yeah mate
>>8295932
d a v i d ~ f o s t e r ~ w a l l a c e
a
v
i
d
`
f
o
s
t
e
r
`
w
a
l
l
a
c
e
Well /lit/, I want to start reading Evola, what's the best order to read his books in?
>>8295844
You're making one of the best choices in your entire life, OP. Prepare to reach transcendence and realise the state that the world is in.
Revolt Against The Modern World > Men Among The Ruins > Ride The Tiger, is the order in which to read the primary body of his work - each book captures his thought and philosophies well.
>>8295920
Revolt Against the Modern world is really fucking expensive. If it's his most important work, why is it not printed as much as other books?
>>8295920
Where would The Doctrine of Awakening fall? The premise seems fascinating
>ywn live a full life like Rimbaud
>>8295814
>ywn love a fair twink like Rimbaud
>>8295814
Rimbaud was a qt
Is he worth reading?
For some reason I thought he died at 27 and was like yeah he had a full life but he died at 37 and it's a pretty average life
What do you think about /lit/ being in an anime website?
Is it good?
Is it bad?
I like to discuss the merits of both as far as storytelling goes. Too bad about faggot mods though
>>8295830
But what do you think of it?
I don't think about it.
I watch anime occasionally and read manga just a little less than I read books.
Nothing wrong with it.
Book of the New Sun and Black Company are decent, Name of the Wind is fucking cringe, but holy shit this book is such a better read than any of them. Such strong characterization. Is it worth sticking with?
I closed it like 3 chapters in. I thought it was going for "intentionally bad and trope filled" like a b movie and that's just not my bag man
Abercrombie has decent characters but does fuck all with them.
You're literally better off reading GRRM
>>8295990
I find character-driven fantasy a nice change of pace from tedious world building.