Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 3273. page

>>8316133
It's pretty great but at the end Bruce Willis is a dead people

>>8316133
Dumbledore dies.

I finished it about a week ago. If you're not enjoying it now you probably won't, its style is consistent throughout.

>>8316130
>that piece
what piece?
this piece?

>>8316141
piece = book

try the joke instead

Idk, but I thought Growth of the Soil was overrated too. Hunger was the only other book I've read by him and I enjoyed that, but he doesn't really seem that important to me. But I've also only read him in English.

Shameless bump.

>>8316198
I'm starting to believe that I'd need to read the book in some Norwegian forest to feel what he wants to convey.

I'm just waiting for the first guy to post the cover of Mein Kampf. I'm pretty sure that joke hasn't been made before on /lit/.

Manifesto del Futurismo

>>8316109
Not a book, but I really enjoyed this old article from Umberto Eco in the New York Review of Books
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/06/22/ur-fascism/

The Great National Novel seems like a purely USonian meme. Everyone else seems content with just having a national epic.

>>8316038
It's the same kidn of thing, really.

>>8316038
Yeah, I think it's because the USA is too new to have a national epic, so they have to settle for a Great Novel. Although I suppose the colonists might have produced a national epic if they hadn't been such assholes to the native population.

>>8316005
Better than the film.

The film is better

>>8316005
the novel and the film are equally great

I don't understand the hype

>>8315864
>quixote instead of quijote
>Spanish

Fuck all Spanish literature ever.

>>8316811
nice b8 m8

Neruda a shit.

>>8315863

Borges
Vallejo
Paz
Pizarnik

Nicanor Parra if have a sense of humor.

good luck, amigo.

>>8315863
Bequer
Mario Benedetti
A important one is Ruben Dario

Also the Romanceros are so good (the older the better).

>>8315851
out of the top 10, only four are difficult to read, and IJ is just a meme

What do you mean by difficult?
Difficult as in, hard to understand what's going on? Or that the themes and meaning of the book is hard to decipher?

File: 1424956996098.jpg (48KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x375px

Are you suggesting the Hobbit and Fahrenheit 451 are difficult to read?

>>8315842
In the words of Trump, the art of the deal is the second greatest book after the bible (but the bible took 11 people to write...)

Enjoy this masterpiece, be prepared to make the greatest deals of your life, and reread, my friend.

File: warcraft.jpg (30KB, 266x320px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 266x320px

>>8315850
All of the humour aside, do you know the name of the publishing style of this type of book?

It's also similar to the Warcraft books.

Do you mean mass market paperback?

>I haven't seen Adorno on here since I started shitposting.

lurk moren ewfag

>salty
Time to kill yourself.

>>8315823
I enjoy the bump, but I would consider myself well versed in this boards spooks already. I'd enjoy some feedback on this however.

I just finished an essay by Peter Sloterdijk, and he seem'd to reference the frankfurters a lot.

Ask your questions better you stupid cunt.

Flann's so fucking godtier.

Try The Third Policeman if you haven't yet, then be disturbed by the fact he wrote it in 1939 and that atomic theory was too new to be published til 1967, when readers would get it.

>>8315813
>he was dead whole time xDDDD
dogshit

>>8315777
You'll kill yourself?

Good riddance

>>8315762
Go meet people, you faggot

No Longer Human

Becoming An Hero by Flimbus Digglewhit.

>>8315750
>>>/mu/