What went wrong?
Nothing, its a great book.
Or did you mean the main character?
>>8399717
>did you mean the main character?
Yes.
>>8399723
He understood that normies are evil
https://www.4chan.org/banner-contest/lit
>tfw bad banners
>>8399605
I kind of like a couple but yeah these mostly suck
needs katie, joker rape, please no corn father, or commentaries on gallic wars read/expected/got
i like the one with the dictionary lol
Hey e/lit/ists, I am writing a medieval low-fantasy novel.
Assume these things are applied:
- Matriarchy because women have more magic power than men.
- Normally, women are the ones who initiate relationships, sex.
So I need some suggestions for this:
- How should pregnancy work?
>Pregnancy gives women more magic power?
>Change how does the pregnancy work, like... men are the ones who can be pregnant.
>?
I am not a native English speaker. Should I make any grammar mistake, please don't kill me.
I am not a feminist or anything. I just want to use the concept to make social commentary.
Can you give us an idea of the plot? Pregnancy giving women power isn't that original. (Not that it has to be.) I think a bit of plot would make this question easier.
>>8399588
mpreg is always the way to go, gotta tap that fetish audience
Honestly?
This sounds gross and fetishy, have you tried talking to /tg/ about it?
TheyyWelove that shit over there.
"This is not writing, this is Barbara Cartland - and Barbara Cartland at least has the courage not to commit hara-kiri over it."
-On Yukio Mishima
/lit/ blown the fuck out
>>8399577
>non-entity says something about an entity
?
>>8399592
>Peter Ackroyd
>non-entity
>>8399577
>it may be that Nabokov is fascinated by his own work, and so continues to harass and worry it in order to extract some key or secret code which will justify it all; or, more probably, it may be that his talent has long since atrophied and he is condemned to the constant reworking of his original material, to press some scent out of the already heavily pressed flower […]. When a novel strives too hard to become literature, it falls into literariness. Nabokov’s words are hollow and external, and he lays them on with a trowel. All that is left is solemn persona playing with himself and that—of course—leads to blindness.
On Nabakov
Most great people had done something great at 25.
If you haven't done shit at 25 you will most likely never accomplish anything in life. Enjoy your day, now.
>OP attempts to pass his psychological buck onto others
nice try bud
>>8399557
Greatness is subjective. Sage.
>>8399557
Frederick Douglass was 27 when he wrote his Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, so I feel ok.
>Well Anon, we dont normally come in to contact with non-Oxbridge writers but when our old drinking club friend from Trinity College insisted that we read your work, we decided to give it a chance, and we were impressed enough to give you this interview. We need to ask you some questions before we can consider considering it for publication.
>It obviously appeals to certain online subcultures and youths in general. You do have your own active Twitter and Facebook accounts with a built up online presence, correct...?
>Though Im sure you have a SnapChat and Instagram audience at the very least...
>Surely you vlog on YouTube...?
>Thanks for the information Anon, well be in touch if we need anything else!
>look at how diverse we are
>>8399502
If I had all those things, I certainly wouldn't be wasting my time talking to you cunts, I'd be self-publishing.
>>8399528
What are you attempting to express with this post?
lmao he struggled to get through Blood Meridian because it 'disturbed' him too much.
What a fat fucking pussyhole.
>>8399472
>tfw you will never be patrician enough to be moved that strongly by literature
I want to feel but I don't
>>8399558
It's called being overly sensitive, not patrician.
>>8399559
>tfw not sensitive enough to be moved that strongly be literature
It feels exactly the same
What are some /lit/ approved podcasts?
>>8399441
radio lab and in our time are good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKTMmbGiqOc
I bookmarked this earlier today, looks like she's got some good stuff (don't have to watch the vid, they're in the description)
>>8399722
Looks crazy. Also, what is it with women and the attraction for parapsychology ?
>want to read a non-fiction book, usually philosophical or political
>start reading it but soon find out that it's a response to another work
>stop reading it and start reading the other work
>find out that too is a response to another work
>etc
>have to read a load of books just to understand one book
Why is this allowed?
>>8399440
Context clues and Wikipedia. Don't actually set out to read full length works unless you're genuinely interested in their content, otherwise see the above mentioned.
>>8399440
>It's another 'I want to understand absolutely every single reference' episode.
No wonder you autistic fucks never read.
I'm reading Schopenhauer's The World As Will and Representation having only read the Greeks and a handful of his essays (which are what got me interested in him). I'm doing okay so far, I just Googled a summary of his first work that he recommended one read first. I can piece together most of what he means by context clues, despite him asserting that one has to read a library before tackling his work.
So is this vaporware?
Vampercore?
>a cumming penis
>>8399467
>projecting this hard
how do i get a stroke of genius ?
>>8399399
ask carol vorderman to give you a handjob
>>8399399
eat out of the trash can of ideology
>>8399399
Eat sausages every day, smoke and drink heavily. It will come to you.
Who are some poets with styles similar to the lyrics of Townes Van Zandt?
i've only listened to Live at The Old Quarter (tho i've listened to that a lot) what do you reccomend from him?
>>8399356
s/t, Our Mother the Mountain and Flyin' Shoes are all great releases. I'd say everything he released in the 60s besides his first album (For the Sake of the Song) is worth a listen though.
I'm curious about Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. The animated disney film is one of my favourites and I don't know if I will enjoy the book(s) as an adult.
Is it purely for children?
Thoughts on Beckett's trilogy?
>>8399194
>Read Waiting for Godot back in the spring
>Now reading an anthology of some of his lesser-known drama like Krapp's Last Tape/Act Without Words
Are his novels similar? I fucking love his brand of blunt, humorous surrealism.
>>8399200
Krapp's Last Tape has similar elements to the Molloy trilogy.
>>8399194
beckett is lit incarnate as fuck man, like i can imagine any one of you fuckers chain smoking binge drinking and spinning yarn with him lol
Did Quentin fuck Caddy?
Quentin was a cuck
No quentin just got pissed when other guys fucked caddy but he was a pussy and never had the balls, Caddy fucked swagged out fuckboyzz who could get it
>>8399171
Caddy's daughter's name is Miss Quentin. There are myriad reasons why Caddy would name her child after her late brother, but the Faulkner-fact of the matter is, late in the book she is literally the last vestige of Quentin's namesake. I think she fucked Quentin. Taking into account the book's emphasis on ancestors and decedents, it's the only scenario that further promulgates the chronictoxicfamily themes to the readers while at the same time giving due diligence to the actual cast of the book and not Somefuck Randy catcalling Caddy on the periphery.
I am Confucius. Maybe mencius? Anyone take this book seriously?
Define what you mean by taking it seriously. Using it as a means to understand some of the motivations behind certain historical people's actions would make sense to me, I would assume having not read it.
The art of war section is pretty straightforward. But the Confucius part doesn't seem to have a purpose.
Overrated. Highly disappointed and overrated.