It's coming
>actually buying books
>>8410780
You make me sick.
Any blind Anons here? How does it feel to be a blind person on an imageboard? Share you experiences with us.
My feelings aboard this board are fine and dandy but although I am able to see clearly so I am unsure as writing this message whether the aforementioned feeling pertains to this thread but perhaps you could tell us whether it does, friend.
>>8410726
You're funny. Let's chat sometime. <3
yeah, I'm blind, what of it
you're all just a bunch of fucking dweebs anyways, i got my hot ass girlfriend to type this shit and after she sends it i'm gonna get that morning pussy
How many books do you have to read preemptively, or how high does your reading level have to be to finish a book like Gravity's Rainbow? I read 1984, The Stranger, The Metamorphosis, The Catcher In The Rye, In The Miso Soup, and The Wasp Factory but a lot of other books are pretty difficult for me, like underground man, the passion according to g h, or nausea, which I just straight up never finish when I try to start reading them.
So how long do you think it will take me to get to the level required to tacked books like infinite jest, gravity's rainbow, or ulysses?
>>8410691
You either can, or can not. You can't 'advance' in reading level by practice. You either grow into it, or you don't. This is not a video game where you 'level up'.
>>8410720
Only intelligent responses please.
>ulysses
You need to have read 29 books, including at least 2 written before 500 AD and 8 from between 1600 and 1922 AD. You also need to be familiar with the mechanics involved in penises.
>gravity's rainbow
You need to have read 26 books, including at least 1 written by a German author, 2 from between 1945 and 1965 AD, and 2 from between 1965 and 1990 AD. You also need to be familiar with at least one penis
>infinite Jest
You need to have read 3 books, including at least 1 of over 100 pages and 1 written for ages 10 and over. You also need to be familiar with masturbation.
what is best ethics book or moral philosdopher?
Ulysses by James Joyce
Infinite Jest by Whoever The Fuck
Third Meme Book
Ethics by (((Baruch Spinoza)))
Aristotle ofc
can anyone recommend some pro-fascism or fascist literature? i want to become more well-versed in the subject but don't know where to begin or who to read, bar the obvious people (pic related)
Lit did I fuck up? I was introduced to nietzsche when I was 14 and I started reading beyond good and evil when I was 15. Didn't understand it but tried to decode what I could. I then at 16 I developed a love for philosophy and started learning about Plato and Aristotle not reading there works but just learning what they created. Now recently I started reading alot of religious existentialism like spinoza and kierkegaard. So what I'm asking Is I will read everything over again but how do I officially start to read philosophy so I can understand what I'm reading as well as progress to harder things like hegal.
>>8410612
Pardon the bad grammer on my phone and half the screen is cracked
>>8410612
It'd not a fucking booklist. Read what you want, all philosophies are incredibly personal and different for all humans anyway.
The only real order with philosophy is references and you don't have to read those linearly either.
G R E E K S
R
E
E
K
Sstart with'em
ok can we get a board for like all types of books regardless of popularity or genre? because this board majorly sucks for anyone wanting to discuss anything that isn't one of the handful of /lit/ approved books. you snobs just spam abuse and endless memes at anyone you consider a plebeian. seriously, we need a separate board for all books so that /lit/ can finally die.
how about you separate yourself from this board and never come back?
>>8410606
reddit.com/r/books
r/books
is franzen the only living truly great american author?
>Franzenstein
>great
He's not looking too good.
>>8410595
no, franzen is not good
Can there be self-awareness/consciousness without language?
woof
RYes. Language just consists of arbitrary words attached to ideas and objects. Without knowing a spoken language, you would still develop a method of attaching meaning to objects, in order to recall, compare, and think about them.
Doubtful, or so it seems to me.
One can certainly, or obviously, have a sequence of contiguous sense experiences unified, perhaps, by an underlying and continuous will to survive, albeit unconsciously. In that case, a subject emerges, but - it would seem to me - the subject would be entirely ignorant of its own status 'as subject'. Unless, of course, the memories which that subject accrued - which would be sense, rather than language, impressions - i.e. the bitter taste of poison, or pleasant smell of pineapple - could dictate his/her behaviour in such a way that the present recollection of past pleasure or pain would - at the moment of recollection, or recognition - influence the internal identity of the subject (e.g. the self-awareness that 'I' enjoy 'that' pineapple) in a manner which is non-reliant upon language. Is that not a form of consciousness? The anticipation of future pleasure based on the recollection of past pleasure? Memory isn't strictly linguistic, but it does give shape to our future and present behaviours in a manner which might be considered 'conscious'.
finished my first book in literally years today lads
>>8410514
good for you
>>8410514
What was it?
>haven't finished anything in one and a half weeks
>way behind where I wanted to be for this summer
>almost incapacitated by my feeling of guilt towards myself
>Seneca quotes haunting my sleep
>can't masturbate in peace
>
>this fucking guy
Finished my first book in years today /lit/!
Finished the Iliad, but what disappointed me was that the Trojan horse was not in the poem? was that early on in the war or something?
Anyways, it feels good completing a book, it's motivating desu. What should i go to next?
>he's literally starting with the greeks
we got another one boys
>>8410423
It's all good and well that you're reading again. Hell, it's even sort of okay that you're actually starting with the Greeks, but you don't start with The Iliad you moron.
Get memed.
>>8410431
I can only become interested in a piece of literature if it is in some way related to anthropomorphic animals.
pls nobully i wish to broaden my intellectual horizons and this is how i'm starting
i don't want to stay this way forever
there's this whole realm of literature related to a species of anthropomorphic ape that actually exists, it's called "literature"
saged.
>>8410378
>actually exists
Please I do not understand i thought the point was that literature could be about anything
Is non-fiction regarded more highly than fiction I am new to all this.
Watership Down could work. Full of feels and rabbits.
How much time do you spend on /lit/ and reading books in a day?
>>8410349
>on /lit/
2 hours
>reading books
8 hours
$5 of time
>>8410357
How do you have so much time to do that? Student, NEET, or just a gay faggot?
Of all the Scandinavian/Nordic languages, which is the best to learn for literature?
Should I learn Icelandic, even if just for the sagas and such?
Are you interested in any of the individual cultures or particular regional lit?
I'm thinking about learning one of these languages myself, but it would depend on which place I visit. Since I'm a poorfag it seems unlikely I will ever get to that point so I'm not pursuing it myself.
I'm Danish, and I think you will get the furthest with that language. Just my opinion.
>>8410342
Yeah too bad you all sound like retarded ducks choking on ice
t. Swede cuckboi
whats some swashbuckle core works besides Dumas?
Stevenson
Sabatini.
>>8410330
Is twenty years after worth it?