What does /lit/ think of this novel? How much of it do you think really happened?
>>8523955
sloane?
>>8523970
Zanzibar?
Fuck you guys then
Hello /lit/
I fancy buying The Library of Greek Mythology but I see two versions being recommended. The Loeb Classical Library version or Oxford World's Classics.
On Amazon I notice the latter has less pages, does this one have less content?
Any recommendations that aren't these two? Thanks
Loeb books are bilingual so they have the text twice. OWC are more for the non-specialist reader.
>>8523941
Ah, thank you anon. Do you know if the bilingual part accounts for why the The Library of Greek Mythology is split into two volumes?
so the real reviews are in..... and they aren't good. welp what did you expect? i went to pick my copy up and exchanged it for J R, good move?
>>8523871
I haven't read (or even started) Jerusalem, but am in the middle of JR right now and am enjoying it. Though I do find it quite taxing to read so it is taking me a while. I've probably taken 10 or so days just to read the first 250 pages
>>8523871
what negative reviews? reader reviews or professional?
>>8523900
reviews aren't bad in either case, actually. OP is just baiting with a "I take my opinion from reviewers" number
i think it might just be parodying the common sentiment
What the fuck is this. This isn't even bait.
>>8523853
Fucking Bombadil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEzhxP-pdos
Are you a bookworm, /lit/?
Real bookworms don't hold books by the spine otherwise you risk bending or putting unnecessary weight on it.
i will put my worm in her book if you catch my drift
nah i'm a vidya slug
I'm curious who you have the most books by on your shelves/ in your readers. I went hard mode and left out genre fiction and children's or YA books, since those authors are prolific and tend to write in series--so if you read them at all, you probably have a stack by them. Here's my list of fiction and poetry authors I own five or more books by:
Margaret Atwood, Jane Austen, A.S. Byatt, Italo Calvino, Joseph Conrad,
Robertson Davies, Charles Dickens, Fyoder Dostoyevsky, Margeurite Duras,
Umberto Eco, William Faulkner, Timothy Findley, Elizabeth Gaskell, Grama Greene,
Anne Hebert, Shirley Jackson, Henry James, James Joyce, Evelyn Lau, William Morris,
Toni Morrison, Alice Munro, Robert Nye, Michael Ontaatje, George Orwell, Salman Rushdie,
John Steinbeck, Mark Twain, Jane Urquhart, Charles Williams, Eiji Yoshikawa.
Poets: Dionne Brand, George Elliott Clarke, Leonard Cohen, T.S. Eliot, Dylan Thomas,
W.B. Yeats.
>meme authors
>>8523851
I listed several I've never seen mentioned on /lit/. Why not tell us what's in your collection, o meme-proof one?
>>8523832
>Kobo Abe
>Ryūnosuke Akutagawa
>Kenzaburō Ōe
>Ray Bradbury
>Richard Brautigan
>Italo Calvino
>Osamu Dazai
>Philip K. Dick
>Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
>Shūsaku Endō
>Robert Hans van Gulik
>Saikaku Ihara
>Yasushi Inoue
>Kazuo Ishiguro
>Tove Jansson
>Yasunari Kawabata
>Donald Keene
>Yukio Mishima
>Ōgai Mori
>Haruki Murakami
>Sōseki Natsume
>Kenneth Rexroth
>William Shakespeare
>Junichiro Tanizaki
>Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev
>H. G. Wells
>Banana Yoshimoto
Has anyone made a legible English version of Finnegans Wake yet? Where you just get the story using regular words?
>>8523810
interesting b8, never seen this angle before. good luck anon.
>>8523810
Fuck off, anime pedo
>>8523810
if you remove the gimmick it loses the only scrap of artistic merit it brings to the table.
does it disgust you knowing how little the average person reads? most people are so ignorant of literature and they seem proud of it for some reason.
>>8523797
No.
There's more to life than book-reading
>>8523809
like what
You rather be Dante or Michelangelo
>a guy who black people name their kids after
or
>a guy no one names their kids after because it's too fancy
I pick the 2nd
D
>>8523753
Fucking awesome post
Can someone recommend me books related to long distance relationships?
>>8523719
Kafka's letters to Milena
It's a bad idea and she will cheat on you by my diary desu
>>8523723
already read it
>>8523733
I still without getting why would someone cheat to the person they care about
Spoilers for pic related below. Much of what I discuss here is taken from the site containing annotations to the Recognitions.
So how are you supposed to discern that Anselm castrates himself? The text reads: (page 645)
>On all fours, he trotted down the emptied platform. He paused for a moment and raised his head to look round him; then he went on, and bumped open the door to the men's room with his head. It was empty. He rose to his knees and reached into his pocket. The crumpled picture he threw into a toilet. With his other hand he undid his clothes, and opened the razor. He paused so, staring up at the dim illumination of the weak electric bulb, his voice audible only then, -In nomine . . . though his lips continued to move, without a tremor, as his hands worked quickly, with deft certainty, unseen.
There is literally nothing that tells you this is what happened. If you go back to page 103 where Anselm first appears, there is a brief excerpt that reads:
>Slightly offended by Bach and Palestrina, short memories reached back, struggling toward Origen, that most extraordinary Father of the Church, whose third-century enthusiasm led him to castrate himself so that he might repeat the hoc est corpus meum, Dominus, without the distracting interference of the rearing shadow of the flesh.
In addition, right before the castration scene, you get, on page 635,
>Anselm came toward him, crushing the orchid under foot...
Recalling page 201, where Gaddis calls to attention:
>the orchids, blossom, not questioning the distant Greeks on how they got their name, driving innocently from the devil's residence in man: that part which the angels cut from the monk Helias.
Am I missing something obvious on how you were supposed to understand what happens to Anselm without recalling all of these throwaway references? Most of the other major plot points in the book were, though not beat into you, not nearly as subtle as this. In fact, I had actually known of the Anselm castration prior to the book and I still "missed" it when I actually got to it.
Please come discuss here https://discord.gg/SWkzH7Z
you must know the saint who shares his name dumbass.
>>8523705
god why do stupid retards even try to read.
Is this book worth reading? I'm not very well read in Philosophy. I've only read a select few of Plato's dialogues, but I'm interested in the subject.
>Bertrand Russel
"no"
>>8523702
Russell is a meme. Only worth reading to give historic context to Wittgenstein
>>8523714
this
>when the novel doesn't include minors having sex
You cant really shit on him for that here when half the people like loli porn and 25% more think 13 should be the age of consent with a 40 yr old man.
>>8523708
4chan isnt /b/, fäm
>>8523670
Is this the best criticism of Green you can come up with? Pathetic.
So I just finished this today and I think my brain is broken. I thought I was a leftist but...but I just don't know anymore. Has anyone else had this experience? Awesome book btw.
looks like you took the cuck pill and got cuck'd cucky
>>8523647
Stop shitting up this board with your unfunny threads
>be me (I'm OP btw)
>read Atlas Shrugged
>mfw
Holy.....I want more.....
Any other books like this my fellow /lit/izens? I thought Catcher in the Rye was my fave book but this takes the cake!
How has the /lit/ you've consumed impacted upon your religious beliefs? Were you reaffirmed reading certain philosophers beliefs, or did they shift your world view?
posting knee chi because obvious reasons
>>8523617
The fedora meme scared me into pretending to be religious
>>8523617
>religious beliefs
life made me irreligious
lit made me realize that theres no such thing as atheism