Browsing wattpad, found this guy. Hasn't written loads yet, but their way of building atmosphere's really good imo. Opinions, and similar stuff to this?
https://www.wattpad.com/story/79683414-fragmented
>>8601126
are you serious?
>>8601126
Truly, we have found the next William Shakespeare! Get OP's wattpad story to Penguin!
>>8601132
What do you mean, am I serious?
Can you reccomend some lit on rebellion, revolution, theory on revolution etc.
Avoid obvious plebe stuff (The Rebel, Bakunin, Marx, Stirner...)
>>8601101
Bonnano, Armed Joy (pleb)
For Ourselves, The Right to be Greedy (pretty bad but an attempt worth reading)
Wilson, To the Finland Station
Balestrini, The Unseen
Elbaum, Revolution in the Air
Draper, Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution
Scott, Hidden Transcripts
Guha, Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency
>>8601118
also Schmitt's Theory of the Partisan and Badiou's Theory of the Subject
Mencius Moldbug
http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/07/democracy-as-adaptive-fiction.html
List three of your most recent reads and get a recommendation
•Collected poems of Robert frost
•the stand
•complete Ezra pound
>>8601076
The Wasteland by T.S. Eliot
>Sound and the Fury
>As I Lay Dying
>Ulysses
The Brothers Karamazov
Romeo and Juliet
Catch-22
>>8602488
Picture This by Joseph Heller. Then Babbitt by Sinclair Lewis. Then Something Happened by Joseph Heller.
I really like his ideas but hate his flowery prose.
Can you recommend me writers in a similar vein who don't need 2000 words and a poem to get to the point?
>>8601026
try reading walden at a slow pace, it's actually a very comfy book if you read it in the right spirit
Maybe Ernest Hemingway would be... more your speed, anon.
>>8602040
>Hemmingway
Halfway through this. I had no idea what it was when I picked it up. This shit is good. You people like it?
Well, what's it about anyway?
>>8600965
It's excellent!
>>8600972
Some bitch caught in a lame ass marrige. She probably gonna fuck that León dude
>professor briefly mentions that he is hosting a symposium with some academics where they'll be discussing literature
>tell him that I am part of an elite internet community that unquestionably reads more patrician and intellectual stuff that they do
>Advise him to throw out some of the old dead guys they'll be reading and instead pick up Gravity's Rainbow and Infinite Jest instead as a topic of conversation
>looks at me bewildered and asks if I am serious
>Those two great postmodern works are part of the 4chan literature canon and they're voted top in our poll of /lit/'s favorite books
Why are academics such plebs? He genuinely thought that David Foster Wallace was an inferior writer to Virginia 'the roastwhore' Woolf
>>8600938
>He genuinely thought that David Foster Wallace was an inferior writer to Virginia 'the roastwhore' Woolf
He is.
and his NAME IS THOMAS PYNCHON
dun dunna dun
dun dunna dun
>>8600938
Does anyone here work in or around academia? Any stories, anecdotes, insight into the current state of affairs? I'm slightly intrigued.
>largest current threads on /lit/ are two threads about video games, a John Green thread, and a science fiction and fantasy general
How do we save /lit/ ?
This thread will surely help.
>>8600931
Not by posting whatever the fuck that ayy lmao doll creature is you posted.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.inquisitr.com/3572882/milo-yiannopoulos-buying-4chan-alt-right-superstar-plans-to-make-offer-that-could-save-image-sharing-board-from-closing-down/amp/?client=safari
we don't
I want to read the Qur'an. I want to read the Qur'an that actually Muslims would read but with an accurate English translation. Nearly every Qur'an on Amazon is full of negative reviews that tell me to get another edition that is full of negative reviews that tell me to get another edition.
Isn't there a standard edition? What is the typical Qur'an that people would read?
Haleem, Oxford
honestly though if you're reading it in English you're so alienated from what actual muslims would read its just silly to be picky. Being pedantic about the authenticity of of the translation is like fact-checking the mini version of Paris they built in disney world
>>8600964
Why? It shouldn't be a grand mystery. We're dealing with language, tangible finite things. If the Arabic says one thing (or is even using a word that can mean several things but Muslims actually understand it to say x) then choose the best possible word and provide a footnote that explains the ambiguity.
I just don't want something that is clearly trying to "make a Westerner think the religion is more peaceful than it is" or which "is biased to make Islam seem more violent than it is."
I just want to read the book, a standard version that a person who wants to read the Qur'an would read.
>>8600980
Fuck you, motherfucker!
Best literature released in 2016 so far?
I haven't read anything published this year.
>>8600876
for me
Does /lit/ think I'm a big guy?
You can't impress anyone with books.
color me impressed
>>8600860
>no Mein Kampf
You are not truly redpilled. Digging the Rand and pro-capitalist stuff though.
Does anyone have some 20th century horror recs? Already checked the wiki, looking for something pretty short.
Thomas Ligotti - Grimscribe
>>8600792
thanks, but even a bit shorter than that. im looking for something in the novella range, I have a lot of shit to squeeze in this month.
>>8600797
It's a collection of short stories. Some of them are only a few pages.
ITT: Memes that actually live up to the hype.
>>8600732
Stoner is literally babby's 1st literature. Read more, pleb.
Infinite jest
>>8600732
lolita.
I thought about something new.
ITT, state the philosophers you feel advanced and adept at understanding. Then we ask each other questions about those we want to know more about.
If you want to call someone a faggot for subscribing to a certain philosopher, that's fine, but at least give a reason for it, so there can be a discussion.
I'll start:
Derrida - Benjamin - Adorno - Agamben - Heidegger
>>8600714
What is Heidegger's relationship with existentialism? Did he care about authenticity and angst and all that sort of thing?
>>8600724
It's difficult. He really is the framework for Sartres thought, it's very obvious. The phrases "existence precedes essense" and "(in)authenticity" (eigentlichkeit / uneigentlichkeit) are all from Being and Time. There are some important differences too though.
First of all, Heidegger tries not to make value judgements about peoples lives. The "inauthentic" life for him is the most common and isn't judged negatively in any vulgar sense. "Bad Faith" and the discipline of criticizing people for not being in enough pain is Sartre's thing.
He isn't interested in God as he pertains to authenticity. Sartres euphoric atheism was his own addition to his analyses.
Biographically, Heidegger found Sartres work to be extremely lucid and interesting in the beginning, but changed his mind later and told him he was shite. Possibly because of Sartre's marxism, though.
Was this sufficient answer? I might be forgetting something.
>>8600724
Oh yeah, angst is a big thing in Heidi though. It's almost theological.
He distinguishes angst from fear, by saying that fear is fear of something in the world (eg. ontic phenomena), whereas angst (Angst) is the fear of being-in-the-world itself, the ontological fear that comes with with possibility to make choices and thus being incomplete in and of oneself. Death in this analysis is the final possibility and the only one that you cannot outpace or push in front of you. Death is thus the most certain possibility, that "completes" the possibilities of the Dasein.
So yeah, a LOT like Sartre in this department.
>reading translations
>not learning the author's language
>not meticulously remodeling your domicile to authentically replicate the living situations of the author when he wrote the work
>>8600696
this reminds me of the /vr/ users who play on a crt, with original hardware, and make their senile mothers drive them to the store to get the genuine sensation of being a kid in the 90s and getting and buying a new videogame.
>>8601167
This is a thing?
>>8600696
>he doesn't dig up the authors corpse to have sex with it
Any texts that explore this?
>sex
Church Fathers
>body
Greeks with few exceptions
>>8600678
Starting Strength
>>8600678
All religious texts.