or was it just easier to be a polymath during his time?
>>8640585
Remember Newton wrote more on Teology than he did physics.
European intellectuals from the 17th,18th,19th century were probably on average more intelligent than today's academics, lets be honest
education today sucks, back then it was required to master greek and latin before you were even allowed in college
>>8640593
That's not Newton, that's Leibniz
I resent the five weeks of my life I gave over to it; I resent every endlessly over-elaborated gag in the book, like the ten-page riff on why video telephones are unviable, or the dozen pages on the teenager who won all his tennis games by playing with a pistol held to his head, or the thousands and thousands and thousands of words devoted to pharmaceutical trivia on all sorts of mind-altering drugs; and I resent especially the 96 pages of tinily typed and deliberately pointless endnotes and ‘errata’, 388 in total, which make the novel a two-bookmark experience.
You *knew* what you were in for. Above all you should resent yourself for not dropping it 1/4 way in if you weren't enjoying it.
>>8640554
Pretty much. You either like Wallace or you don't. If you don't, don't commit yourself to a thousand pages of him.
>the dozen pages on the teenager who won all his tennis games by playing with a pistol held to his head
That was the highlight of the book for me. What didn't you like about that?
Top tier Fiction released in the last ten years.
I'll start.
10:04 - Ben Lerner
>>8640516
What's this? I like that cover
That cover is fucking me up real bad, it doesn't make any sense. Why is WTC on the east side of lower Manhattan? Why are their bridges coming out of midtown west?
What is your opinion on using audio books for epic poetry such as Paradise Lost or the Odyssey?
Why do you care about my opinion? If that's the way you enjoy them, more power to you.
>>8640498
Too much of paradife loft will go over your head.
Odyssey is fine but I'd prefer reading it. It's not better because "thats how homer did it". That is a meme.
is ok i gues. You miss some of the beauty of the form though.
I tried getting into this novella about a year back after seeing an adaption of the book into a short TV mini-series. After about reading little under 1/4 of the book it began to feel like a grind. It felt like I was going through too much meaningless writing to only be exposed to a few truly good areas of the story. What's your guys' opinions? Should I return to War and Peace if it is truly a notable work, or should I simply leave it partially unread?
>>8640478
Tolstoy was a behemothly overrated hack. Your critique sums up his problems nicely. The mini-series is far more concise.t. millennial pleb
Read whatever you want. If it bores you put it down. Ezra Pound said people are fools who read the classics because they're told to and not because they enjoy them. Novels are for pleasure, it's not homework. You don't have to read War & Peace if you don't want to. A lot of people find it tremendously good and interesting, but if you don't, go do something you do enjoy. Life is not that perplexing.
>>8640493
this. Tolstoy is only good for the way he could observe life. You can't learn much about literature from him, and W&P, regardless, is bloated and relatively substanceless compared to many other works.
my body is ready
>>8640465
For Heffley to delight us by his majestic prose and gracious pictoral accompaniment is to live, lads
>>8640483
is this post-post-modernism? everyone who says literature has not progressed in the last decades should read this first.
>>8640465
My diary desu
What do you read on the john?
/lit/
I just watch this spider that lives in the corner and wonder what life is like for a bathroom spider
"Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law"
So, is he trying to say, "Fuck your personal whatever, do only that which is right for all" or am I missing out on something vital here?
Sort of. If by "right for all" you mean, "right were everyone to do the same action in the same situation," then yeah.
>>8640402
>right were everyone to do the same action in the same situation
Is this the nature of universal law?
>>8640388
Nope.
Act only if you wish everyone would act the same way.
Which is better?
>>8640349
Idiotic thread. Obviously The Jest.
>>8640359
Surely you bible
>>8640349
Both have similar merits in terms of style. On the whole, I'd say the bible is more all-encompassing, however it's insightfulness is less consistent. Maybe I'm biased by the cultural significance of the Bible, but I'm inclined towards it. Good question, though.;.
Wait, this is not a joke, i actually want to know.
I also know this has been asked, probably, at least a hundred times this month, if i were to guess because i am new on 4chan, but again, i am serious about this question.
What is the neon genesi evangelion of Literature?
Thank you for your time.
catcher in the rye
>>8640258
my twisted worldnow fuck off
Rimbaud, born on this day in 1854.
" Genius is the discovery of childhood at will"
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/detail/54559
>>8640209
>when the laudanum kick in
Why was he so qt, bros?
all these niggas talkin bout rimbaud's boipussy but didnt that nigga top verlaine and thats why they found rimbaud's cum up verlaine's asshole
I think Mexico and America. They've given us so many good writers. DFW, Don DeLillo, Paul Auster, Ernest Hemingway, Margaret Mitchell, Isaac Asimov, Isabel Allende, Roberto Bolano, and others. Admittedly not all of those were born in those countries, but they lived there for long periods of time.
>>8640111
>Roberto Bolano
>Mexican
>Isamov,DFW, Dellilo
>Good
>No Mention of France
Did they replace your blood with Memes? Did it hurt?
>>8640111
Russia.
Are you dumb or something?
>>8640147
LOL
Who was more right, /lit/?
I'd say Hobbes desu.
>>8640107
Hobbes' state of nature is regarded, more or less universally, as the most realistic nowadays.
I also think that, as time goes on, we are seeing that Hobbes' argument concerning the need for an absolute authority (be it a sovereign or otherwise) was more and more justified.
>Political """Science"""/"""Philosophy"""
>>8640132
>more or less universally
By who?
>we are seeing that Hobbes' argument concerning the need for an absolute authority (be it a sovereign or otherwise) was more and more justified.
Where?
Fuckin' weasel words...
Is anyone here able to unmemeingly give an account of why and how this is so life alteringly insightful
>>8640104
Just read it you fucking pleb
>>8640104
I could. He is talking about the the relationship between man and "society". His wisdom and the price for those who read him the right way, is profund understanding of yourself, the people around you and your relationships to them. His book is a script, behind all other scripts. For those wise and able to have ears for what is silent to others, he goes way beyond "Historischen Materialismus".
>>8640264
nah, cba
I had the most beautiful and positive sexual experience of my life recently, and I'm rattled. I feel like I've missed a certain emotional or even sensual component of sex for a long time, like I've been too emotionally immature to handle it.
Is there any book that deals with something akin to this? It feels almost like the antithesis of sexual experience/desire as portrayed by good old Henry Miller, if that helps.
tl;dr anon had a positive interaction with a female and can't process it or something like that
statutory rape is illegal, anon
>we are so socially inept and pathetic that sex is like a religious or metaphysical experience of Nirvana
>>8640087