Any of you guys ever thought about limiting your reading to a few specific authors and works that you would read and reread over and over in order to improve your writing?
I’m considering doing this semi-permanently. I’ve read a shit ton of books, especially over the last three or so years, but I’ve also realized it would probably take a lifetime for me to read every single classic even one time through, and that saddens me.
This is my list of books I feel would be worth repeated reading and internalizing over the long term. Is it a good idea? What would your list look like?
>Homer – The Iliad and The Odyssey
>Virgil – Aeneid
>Ovid – Metamorphoses
>Giovanni Boccaccio – The Decameron
>Complete Shakespeare
>King James Bible
>Miguel de Cervantes – Don Quixote
>Robert Burton – The Anatomy of Melancholy
>John Milton – Paradise Lost
>Laurence Stern – The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman and A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy
>Victor Hugo – Les Misérables and The Hunchback of Notre-Dame
>Herman Melville – Moby Dick; or, The Whale
>George Eliot – Middlemarch
>Fyodor Dostoyevsky – Notes from Underground, Crime and Punishment, The Idiot, Demons, and The Brothers Karamazov
>Leo Tolstoy – War and Peace and Anna Karenina
>Marcel Proust – In Search of Lost Time
>James Joyce – Dubliners, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, and Ulysses
>>9931340
>Any of you guys ever thought about limiting your reading to a few specific authors and works that you would read and reread over and over in order to improve your writing?
no
>posting women and gay jews
kill yourself
those are classic books and all, but you probably won't sell much by picking up their habits. That isn't what sells, aka it isn't what normies want. Read some Pynchon or Stephen King or some shit like that, not the ancient works people study for school.
>>9931360
>literally one woman
>don't respect authors that are too popular
>but I want to become a famous and popular author
>don't read books that normies are raving about
>but I won't read anything but certified "classics"
Fuck, me too OP. And I hate myself for it. I'm going to read a few important classics then only what I enjoy
>>9931359
>not enjoying classics
What does /lit/ think of the Baconian theory of Shakespeare authorship? As far as I can tell there's no real evidence it happened, but also no evidence otherwise...
>first day of class on shakespeare
>someone asks professor if shakespeare wrote under a pseudonym or the plays were written by someone else
>professor says "We're not supposed to discuss that in this english department, but I will say that i've not seen a shred of evidence that this occurred, yet it is interesting that this theory keeps coming up, and..."
>suddenly random girl has a seizure
>everyones in panic while we get campus health
>class dismissed
Somewhat suspicious to me.
>>9931188
I WILL MAKE A JOKE ABOUT SHAKESPEARE WAS BLACK
THEN YOU SAY 'WE WAS A KING'
OP
DID U KNOW
SHAKESPEARE WAS BLACK WOMEN AND WHITE DESTROY HER LEGACY THROUGH RIGHT WING??HEHE MAKE THE MEME
>>9931198
Don't EVER post in my thread without my permission again.
The Marlowe theory is my favourite. Makes for a good story.
Are there any other philosophy books that contain exercises?
Some way to practice/explore the philosophy I mean
>>9931178
Other than logic, the only exercises would be actually understanding the concepts offered. Try to think of objections to them, and how theyy woyld be recieved by the author. Try to think of examples in life, reword the concepts yourself.
>>9931178
Flip through some tai chi or qi gong books, seriously
>>9931178
Ouspensky's The Fourth Way, and his In Search of the Miraculous (Ouspensky pretty obviously and significantly influenced RAW btw) contain general and important exercises in the Gurdjieff system RAW mentions (in terms of self-remembering, self-observation, and abstaining from expressing negative emotions). Idries Shah in a sense also has philosophy books containing exercises, because he says that reading the Sufi teaching-stories he gives and pondering them from all given angles, focusing on the ones the interest you less purposely and seeing why they don't interest you as much, trying to unravel the more opaque ones, etc., etc., is itself a Sufi exercise.
How can Anglos compete?
>>9931149
This thread is now about how superior the white race is!
Alert /pol/, alert /r9k/. Let's show this cuck what's up. Bring your best infographics and your best insults.
>>9931157
Fuck off
>>9931149
Worst Murakami
>hurr durr rehashing the same exact ideas book after book at least Nabokov only got his little girl fixation after one book
>ha ha look at this kitty cat that has magical fucking powers and shit
Go read Coin Locker Babies and Almost Transparent Blue
This is water.
And this is the well.
What am I in for?
The best book ever written by man or woman
Basically this:
Well, ah'm at one. Ah'll see ye back here at two. Ah'll gie ye ma tie tae pit oan, n some speed. Buck ye up a bit, let ye sell yirsel, ken? So let's get tae work oan they appos.
They placed the application forms on the table in front of them. Renton's was already half- completed. A few entries caught Spud's eye.
- Hey. . . what's this man, likesay? George Heriots . . you went tae Leithy man .
- It's a well-known fact thit ye nivir stand a fuckin chance ay gittin anything decent in this city if ye didnae go tae a posh school. Nae wey though, will they offer a George Heriots FP a porterin joab in a hotel. That's only fir us plebs; so pit doon something like that. If they see Augies or Craigy oan your form, the cunts 'Il offer ye the joab. . . fuck, ah'd better go. Whatever ye dae, dinnae be late. See ye back here in a bit.
>>9931101
I can't read that shite.
any good books about dog feces
Fuck off
>>9931075
lale kidneytriggered name ale trolled to death based and gay
Why haven't you donated to Wikipedia, /lit/?
>>9931070
I'm skint.
>>9931070
I don't care enough
If they shut down another site will offer the exact same service for the exact same cost to me, which is free
If it doesn't, too bad, the trajectory of my life remains nearly unchanged either way, I'd rather use my limited funds on anime figurines
Wikipedia is wholly funded by the CIA, this is just a ruse.
Why is this allowed? Why do you people respect this man?
nobody gives a fuck go back to /tv/
>>9931068
who
>>9931068
You aren't on le redpill boards
Books Transport you to a New World Edition.
>/SFFG/ Recommendations:
FANTASY
Selected:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21329.jpg
General:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21328.jpg
Flowchart:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21327.jpg
SCIENCE FICTION
Selected:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21326.jpg
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21331.jpg
General:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21332.jpg
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21330.jpg
NPR's Top 100 Science Fiction & Fantasy Books:
>https://imgoat.com/uploads/6d767d2f8e/21333.jpg
Previous threads:
>>9930888
>>9925939
Has anyone read Gemma Files' Book of Tongues
>wild west priest is magic
>has sex with a legit psychopath gunslinger
>kill a bunch of people
>fuck around
>Ancient aztec goddess stirs shit up.
>shit goes down
>accidentally doom the whole goddamn world.
and that's only book one
I fucking love it. I haven't seen anyone mention it.
Hello I'm kaladin wow it sure sucks to lift bridges those damn light borns I don't like them one bit. I miss my daaad
How can brandon fill up so many pages with so little?
>>9939046
I'm skeptical, Gemma sounds like a female name
Post some music to accompany this. Instrumental, or subdued vocals at most.
>>9931065
Sunbather by Deafheaven.
>>9931065
https://youtu.be/b45jpDpXCtI
len steal my sunshine
>store won't buy a book I want to get rid of
>I walk back to the section where its author is kept and abandon it there
>>9931051
woAh no WAYy
>tfw you're backed up with so many religious books including gifts and loans you haven't any time for secular reading
Forgive me, Shakespeare
hey outis
glad to see you here
i gonna study philosophy at the university, but your posts make me think that it's empty ..
give me some recs
>>9938952
For philosophy? Parmenides, Heraclitus, Plotinus.
For religion, On the Acquisition of the Holy Spirit, The Ascetic Homilies of Isaac the Syrian, and The Way of a Pilgrim
hey /lit/ first time visiting this board, what is your take on audiobooks? Is it a suitable substitute for visual reading?
>>9931047
For genre fiction and such, sure.
For literature, no.
Overall not good. Reading and listening are very different activities. There is the problem of comprehension w audiobooks in that you miss a lot by naturally zoning out periodically but more abstractly I think you also miss a deeper connection with the text and its poetic elements by not reading the words for yourself.
I listen to pop lit like autobiographies while I exercise if the author/subject is narrating though.
>>9931049
It depends on the literature. KJV was written to be heard, as was Shakespeare.
But OP it is definitely not a substitute. It's a different experience. You can say reading a play is no substitute for seeing a play, and you can also say seeing a play is no substitute for reading a play.