Bought this.
What am I in for guys?
Read it and then make a better thread.
>>8820368
it's good, though I don't see why Gogol had to include that somewhat over the top rape scene
You're in for a shittier version of the divine comedy.
I'm not a writer.
I'm a wronger.
I write wrongs
not tragedies.
No joke, OP, somebody in a creative writing course I was taking one time introduced herself that way.
All she wrote was slightly edgy yaoi.
holy... i want more
I feel like I've been tricked by /lit/ again. I'm 50 pages in, does it get any better?
shameless bump
>50 pages
at least get to a 100 before you judge
>>8820310
What's bad about it?
Discuss.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgaDb5eQkvc
>>8820285
we're over cliff.
He's a pleb. Luckily I don't give him ad revenue by reading the titles of his videos since I know they're devoid of deep analysis and Wikipedia provides better summaries.
If you really have an urge to discuss youtube "critics" I suggest you fuck off back to /mu/
Have you guys actually read this? Type something that proves you've read it. Also general Ulyssess thread. I'll start.
"come come pussy, come"
>>8820257
>OI FUCKEN FARTS
This Joyce fellow truly was a genius
The scene where Stephen's in the pub expounding on Shakespeare and art to some of Dublin's literati and then he doesn't get invited to some exhibition for young poets hit me hard.
>>8820257
Quotes from the first 6 chapters shouldn't count
Where is the Ancient Greece, Gothic England, Renaissance Italy, 1920s Paris, 1930s Vienna, 1960s Woodstock, 1970s New York, 2000s Internet of today?
with the snowdens of yesteryear
>>8820269
What?!
>>8820253
Here in Ecuador there´s a thriving independent music scene of such quality unsurpassed by other countries i know. I usually listen to foreign (aka anglo) music and also very sceptic about my own culture, but i have to say, these musicians are producing some of the best music i´ve heard
Why do so many millennials have blogs on Deleuze and throw around his lingo like it's common knowledge?
Hipsters like to pretend to be smart enlightened post-modern critics
Eventually one of them has something explained to him in a college class
He then uses that knowledge to show off that he is the smart hipster post-modern critic man
The other hipsters copy what he says until absolutely everyone is going
>ahhh yes, indeed but you see, quite verily, rhibozomes.. rhibozomes for the win!
Me on the right
>>8820247
They're very accessible, they outright allow for whoever to interpret their work however, and shit like RHIZOMES really captures people's imaginations.
I wanted to make the love interest a burly guy with a beard, but it's YA too so everyone assumes the guy will be a Chad or a Chad with glasses so will this hurt?
Also, will it be YA if the girl is turning 18 in the novel and the guy is 24? I hate writing about children...
>hates writing about people at prime age for all types of character development
are you five desu
>>8820232
The youngest I would write is 16. No children.
>>8820230
>First book
Male is a mid-20s, 6', beer bellied, hairy, and likely straight guy who is big into survivalism, hunting, fishing, hiking, and so on. Pretty much kinda like a lumberjack.
Female is a... mid-30s was it?... chubby, fairly short, and straight woman ho is a feminist. Due to circumstances in the novel, she's not been able to shave regularly, so her pits/legs have become hairy even though she'd prefer them not to be.
>Second book
Male is a College student in his 20s (I think 28, specifically) who is just about finished. He's around 5'10 or 5'11 I think, is a writer, fairly thin as I recall, long hair typically put into a pony tail, and enjoys frequenting pubs or going to an indoor shooting range in town.
Female is a girl, recently turned 18, who is short, very thin, pale, freckled, redhead, painfully socially inept, and had a VERY fucked up relationship with her father to say the least. There's quite a lot of friction between them, but he seems intent on helping her to open up, even though it causes some turmoil of his own.
>Third book (being written)
Male is a somewhat short and thin fellow with dirty blonde hair and blue eyes. Lives a solitary life in the woods near a cliff with an insane collection of firearms/mags/ammo in a not-so-distant future. Sort of like Mad Max I guess, but more based around firearms/ammo instead of vehicles/fuel. Not much of a sense of humour, quite quiet, and would much rather stay on his own and not bother with other people, but circumstances have made it so he must get involved.
Thus far, there is no female protagonist, however might have figured out a female antagonist.
>Children
I'd like to pull a 'Lolita' and try my hand at a romantic novel including paedophilia. I've not read Lolita yet, so at least I know that I won't be influenced by it and my own book would be a genuinely unique work. I'd say the youngest I'd go is... probably 13. I'd prefer to stick to around 14-15 though. Back when I was a teenager, I had a relationship with a couple 15 years olds (legal in my country) so I could possibly include some scenarios of my own experiences. Probably won't make it a HUGE age gap though, like 30s+ with someone under 16. I'd also like to try a novel that includes incest, but we'll see. It's nice to write under a pseudonym.
So was he actually a psychopath, or just a poser sperg?
>>8820106
I don't think there is a definitive answer. There is a lot of evidence that it was all in his head, but my room mate reminded me of the taxi driver scene, which seems to indicate that at least parts of his murder spree were real. /lit/ hates on BEE so much but I love him, especially American Psycho.
>>8820106
It is intentionally ambiguous.
It's alot more satisfying to me if he spend his nights murdering faggots walking their dogs and no one cares because muh shallow 80s consumerism.
If it's just in his head I don't know what you would takeaway from that other than a shamalamadingdong teir twist ending.
What does /lit/ think about this books?
>>8820020
>tell me how I feel about this
Kys
>>8820034
Are you mental?
>>8820020
One of my favorites
I believe the consensus of this board is that it's too reddit to be discussed so people pretend not to like itthey're half-right
/bailey/ general
Pirates aren't even a mythical creature edition
FAQs:
>How do I into Bailey?
Browse your school's bookorders and keep an eye out for the ten-book megapack. The first ten are very important to Eddy and Melody's relationship and establish the Mrs. Jeepers subplot, which gets expanded in the Super Specials. After that you can read around (but chronological order is strongly recommended)
>I'm ~20 years old and I want to become a Bailey expert. If I read them every day, will I make it?
Almost certainly not. If you haven't been reading Bailey since at least the first grade then you're going to miss out on most of the subtle psychological variations in the kids' investigative processes i.e. Liza subverting Eddie's deductive reasoning through her own inductions, but Howie satirizing her analysis with an introduction to the problem of induction. You can still admire Dadey's wordplay and her monstrous implications though
>Do I need to know the historical Western mythographies and regional idiolects to appreciate Bailey?
Eh... It's not required for the main series, but it helps bigtime in the Holiday Specials.
>>8820007
I never seem to get a chance to post this.
>>8820190
Wasn't there another edit of "Dracula doesn't Drink Lemonade" or am I imagining things?
Who is your favorite philosopher?
Cioran
>>8819977
Why Descartes?
Convince me to real this novel Also, I'm strict believer of rationality.
But nothing is real, anon. So it won't matter if you read it or don't
>>8820000
Go to bed Viper (also check'd those beautiful quads).
>>8819973
>Whatever, I don't really care
>It's not important
>I'm bored
>your age
>your job (highschool and college kids fuck off)
>your /lit/ related ambition
>21
>NEET
>writing my diary, desu
>24
>graphical designer (going for a degree in translation next year, because fuck it)
>publish a novel (I've written two), keep writing until the day I die, translate Gaddis, Gass or any other autistic writer for my native language
>>8819956
Translating which languages?
What are books to base my life on? I've been reading Seneca Letters to a Stoic and for the first time it rubbed me the wrong way that he didn't "practice what he preached". How do I know this way of life is possible if the person preaching it didn't live it.
It's like living the life of Jesus when a) he probably wasn't real or it was heavily exaggerated and b) you look at history and the world today and see so many proclaimed christians living their life contradictory to Jesus.
The whole world's a sham. I hate being cynical and bitter but nothing is concrete. Laws are fickle, good and bad don't exist. It's all based on what's best for society (majority) at the time. In Ancient Greece it was normal to fuck little boys but now it's not. I'm not a pedo but don't tell me it's illegal because muh morals. Spartans didn't have a problem with it. Monogamy is a social construct. Sometimes I want to be monogamous with my future wife but other times I get horny and want to be polygamous and want her to fuck other men. My disney side is competing with all this cuck porn. (as in I don't know which one I want) Do I want to be promiscuous? Epicurus said I should to be happy.
The only thing that's calmed me a bit was that Seneca said to avoid "mass crowds" because they infect the mind with vices. And I believe that is true. Whenever I find myself listening to pop music (yeah i know) and see the attractive women and attractive men, I suddenly yearn to be attractive and to possess an attractive women. Even going as far as planning to hire a escort in the near future.
Porn doesn't satisfy me but I still do it because I get pleasure from it. It is a vice. But I was always under the impression that it was normal for a man to masturbate to porn. So it seems impossible to quit it. I always go back to it because of that.
>>8819918
start with the greeks
The Ego and Its Own
>>8820164
>The Ego and Its Own
is this b8 or you srs?