I've been reading books most of my life, but I'm absolute shite when it comes to choosing good ones. Can you guys give me some recommendations?
>>8919390
there's a sticky for that purpose, but i'll bite: what do you like?
>>8919394
I've red most of the critically acclaimed stuff like 1984, Fahrenheit 451, The Kite Runner and that sort of thing. I wouldn't really know what category/genre that would be in though.
>>8919407
read* shit
How do I cope with the fact that the entirety of me i.e. "myself" is just an amalgamation of everything I am influenced by and not unique or new at all?
I literally cannot be myself because there is no way to know who myself really is.
Start things and try to finish them.
The problem of authentically "being oneself" disappears when you actually set out to "do" anything; your success or failure will constitute whatever you were as you continue to "become" whatever it is you are.
Why do you feel the need to be unique and new?
All people know are things others remembered and shared with them; basically all of those things are/were derivative of something else.
That's just the way it is.
>>8919320
>you take this anon's advice
>you have been influenced by him
there's no escape op
Closet bisexual?
>>8919301
Doubt it. Not the way he wrote to Nora.
I think Joyce was even more red-blooded than most "Greats" were. His biggest competition was Proust, and we all know how Proust was.
>>8919301
No way. You can't hide your homosexuality as a writer. Just ask Lawrence.
Not even "closet."
Where should I start with Lester Bangs?
>>8919229
He doesn't look like he does
psychotic reactions and carburetor dung
here's a primer:
http://www.oocities.org/tracybjazz/hayward/van-the-man.info/reviews/astral.html
>>8919229
With his Metal Machine Music review.
>reading ATD
>it's a chums of chance chapter
>mfw
Why isn't this work of Pynchon's not discussed more often? I'm about 2/3 through and I'm seriously blown away. I'm actually reading it because I went to the bookstore looking for M&D and settled for this instead.
>>8919219
People see that it's not treated as Prime Pynchon and they see that it's a thousand pages, so they decide it's not worth it. desu because it's more accessible than GR it goes by a lot faster than that one.
>>8919289
>desu because it's more accessible than GR it goes by a lot faster than that one.
i don't understand that at all. ATD was near impossible for me to follow even as reading it. GR is crystal clear just by memory.
It's just so big...
Kinda new to /lit/ are there other flow charts like the greek one?
>>8919188
Oh boy are there!
At the very top you'll see a link under 'Recommended Literature'
Theres loads there
>>8919188
My personal list:
"Mythology" by Edith Hamilton
"A Brief History of Ancient Greece"
The Iliad by Homer
The Odyssey by Homer
Theogeny, Works and Days by Hesiod
The Oresteia (Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers. Eumenides) by Aeschylus
The Theban Plays (Oedipus Rex, Oedipus at Colonus, Antigone) by Sophocles
Medea by Euripides
The Frogs, Lysistrata, The Clouds by Aristophanes
Euthyphro, Apology, Crito. Phaedo, Meno, Republic by Plato
Metaphysics, Nicomachean Ethics, Eudemain Ethics, Politics by Aristotle
Kobo E-Reader recommendations? Which Kobo E-reader should I invest in?
>getting spooked into "supporting independent book merchants" instead of just getting them off amazon or itunes
>>8919173
>Implying I'm going to buy my books
What's the deal with him?
He saw in many which ways.
>>8919164
One eye on the intrinsic meaningless of life.
One eye on the bitches.
What is /lit/'s opinion on "Into the Wild"? Going to read it right now, I want some discussions when I get back.
>>8919135
My ex girlfriend said she loved the movie. Never watched it, and never will because it makes me remember that fucking bitch.
>>8919204
It's pretty good. Forgot it was based on a book. Might read it myself now.
Into Thin Air is better tbqh
Post essential opiumcore
>>8918981
Flowers of Evil is essential opiumcore
Who here /drugaddict/?
>>8918986
Me, well not really addicted but preparing some poppy tea now
Degenerates get out
what did he mean by this?
he's just bragging about being a certified edgelord
He is implying that intellectualism should not be restrained to the binary spectrum of "healthy" or "unhealthy" labelling - that no scholarly paradigm is dangerous.
>>8918950
He misunderstood what they meant by intellectual health. People were asking Foucault to stop having sex with the bugchasing students.
>"can't even begin the describe the horror"
>proceeds do describe it
Was he retarded?
>can't even begin to understand anything he's read
>proceeds to make a thread about it
Was he retarded?
help. how do i into hyperbole. sos.
>>8918915
It pisses me off how everyone criticizes Lovecraft's typical "undescribable horror" when it's the BASIS of his work, perhaps the most original and aesthetic notion he came up with. It's the very kernel of his works, that which distinguishes him from the mere dustbin of unknown, long past fantasy and science-fiction and horror writers. The notion that language is inadequate to describe reality, and that the true, transcendent reality that can't be described by language is itself horrifying is what raises him a notch above all the other forgotten horror writers. There's a genuine philosophy behind his horror stories, one that might make you stop and think for a moment. Is he Joyce, Proust, Melville? No, definitely not, his prose is as convoluted as theirs but in a worse way, but he's at least deeper and better than other horror writers for the philosophical nature of his works.
Criticizing the (admittedly on first glance cliched and trite) "undescribable horror"-trope in his works means you don't understand Lovecraft.also, he was only describing what he could of it, what could be described by language and comprehended by the speaker's mind, that's the point
what do we think of Malazan here? how does it stack up to other contemporary fantasy
It's absolute shit.
>>8918839
>we
We don't read Malazan or fantasy here. You're looking for the containment - i mean genre thread.
>>>/lit/sffg
The only fantasy series that even comes close to being "literary", in my opinion. Dont listen to faggots who've never actually read a book, read it and decide for yourself.
If you read this incorrectly you will always be a pleb no matter how much you learn or how many books you read.
so what if i am???!??
Subvocalizing masterrace is finally vindicated
it syas "a brid in teh teh buhs" rigth?
Ive been drawn to the idea that Bram Stokers Dracula is a good book, never read it, is it actually a good read or have I romanticised the idea of it?
Starts out really spooky, get super boring in the middle, hits all the victorian cliches, and then evolves into this adventure montage before ending in a really anti-climactic way. If you're really into vore you might like the fly eating part.
>>8918885
HA okay looks like ill give it a go, cheers
It has its moments. Van Helsing's dialogue is always long-winded and tiresome but that was my only major gripe. I'd recommend it.