Is it safe? Is it good? Is it God-tier literature?
pls respond, at least my jap friends
>The GREATEST Japanese science fiction novel of all time.
It says that on the cover. Doesn't that answer your question?
>>9948967
marketing
I want to know your opinion because you are real people
You might be full of this discussion but i will ask anyway. What is lit`s opinion on Brave new World. How much came true, what didn`t and how overrated is it?
And what do you think about Island and can Aldous ideas be actually used to better society?
schöne???
can someone explain to me his use of the word 'pneumatic' ? seems like it is used throughout the novel to refer to plump women in a neutral way [sometimes they self-refer as pneumatic, whence the "neutral" I guess] but for some reasons it sounds very close to a back-handed compliment (airhead... that was what I thought when I first read it)
also im not a native but I believe it is not used outside of this book
>>9948843
> having a well-proportioned feminine figure; especially : having a full bust
How do I get a literary agent? Is it even possible anymore? I already sent queries 200 times earlier this year, should I just do it again and again?
Go to a convention perhaps
>>9948671
Edit your query letter famalam.
On /t/ there's a Great Courses thread, if you do a little link-hopping you can find the series titled "How to Publish Your Book." Download it, watch it, and pay attention. Pretty solid advice, especially concerning the query letter.
Outside of that, try and get some short stories published. It's a means to an end, but it's also fun to enter contests and do the submission process yourself. Having published a thing or two lends you credibility.
If you're too lazy to do either of these things, you really have no business writing a novel in the first place.
>>9948754
what contests do you submit to? I write science fiction
Will I get pussy if grills see me reading Wuthering Heightsand liking it?
Guys who like women are weak world af
Real men fuck cute shotas
>>9948590
No, you will BE a pussy.
ITT writers virtually all of whose works are worth reading. Pic related.
I honestly can't think of anyone else other than some people who only wrote like one or two books
>>9948582
Tolstoy's FICTION. All of it.
All specifically literary Whitman=Leaves of Grass and some short, lovely prose pieces.
More than a few here have read all of Pynchon's and/or McCarthy's books without giving it a second thought.
>>9948582
sempre cara mi fu quest'erma imageboard
Alright, as far as I can tell, self-promotion isn't banned on /lit/, so I figured I'd be upfront instead of trying that obnxious astroturfing "hey guys look what I found ;)))" shit.
For the last month and change, I've been working on an online project called Sermomancy.
https://sermomancy.com
The concept is simple: A story told in 1001 parts, of 1001 words each, posted DAILY for 1001 days.
This means a final word count of 1,002,001 - and a time to completion of 2.74 years. So this isn't a small undertaking.
Part One, which encompasses chapters 1-30, finished posting last night, and the first chapter of Part Two will post a few hours from now.
The story is complicated and multi-layered (if it wasn't, it'd be pretty boring considering its vast word count) but I'd say it broadly comes under the umbrellas of fantasy and mystery, with the overall framing device of a Victorian-adventure-story type journey.
Basically, I'm curious as to what people think of what I'm doing, and what I've written so far. So far it has little exposure beyond my immediate friends and family, and while feedback has been very positive so far, obviously it's gonna have been kinda biased by nature.
A little warning: It starts off kind of slow, in my opinion. I think the biggest weak point is the second chapter. Maybe you guys will disagree, though.
Jesus, this is why you should proofread even 4chan posts. So many "so fars," and that "obnxious" typo.
Apologies!
>fantasy
No. Go away. Waste your time elsewhere or with something else.
>>9948551
Did that word make you think of dwarves and elves and stuff?
If so, perhaps I should find a better description.
Which book should I read off this?
they all look so fukn good boys, which one do I read first?
>>9948521
BotNS
>>9948530
which?
What are your thoughts on Knausgaard? Have you read his 'auto-biography', My Struggle?
As for me, I definitely enjoyed it as a whole but sometimes his prose wasn't as compelling.
For me he's at his best when he discusses literature and neglects describing his early breakfast in 5 paragraphs. If he'd release an essays book I'd be among the first to pre-order it.
Autumn is gonna arrive in my mail in a few days, I'm pretty excited to dive into it.
>>9948509
He has an essay collection called "Sjelens Amerika", but I don't think it's been translated to English.
>>9948509
Autumn is really disappointing. Paulo Coelho tier tbqh
>>9948509
Pretty sure he is /ourguy/
Where do I go after I've started with the greeks and resumed with the romans?
Byzantium, Japan, Nordic mythology, Slav mythology
Anything on it's history, wars, what life was like, history of philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Xenophon ect and their works.
Thanks!
>>9948448
Bump
>>9948452
It's that time again
Bump
Here's a free Yale course, with lectures and syllabus included:
http://oyc.yale.edu/classics/clcv-205
If you like lectures, search torrent sites for Kenneth Harl's Peloponnesian War course
The Yale guy also has a really good book on the Peloponnesian War which makes reading Thucydides a lot easier. (Incidentally, the Yale guy was Harl's PhD supervisor I think.)
The Yale course uses Pomeroy's book Ancient Greece, which is OK. It also has a shorter version for dummies that you shouldn't get. Personally I prefer big clunky books like Bury & Meiggs History of Greece to the Death of Alexander, though a bit outdated, and the intro chapters can be more boring than you want because they are mostly archaeological and "big history" (guessing about trade routes and daily life, rather than getting into traditional Ancient Greek narrative history). Might want to skip ahead.
Thucydides is fairly hard to read, and helped a lot by the Landmark Edition of his book which includes maps (though I think the translation is older and slightly stuffier than more recent, more readable ones).
Herodotus is easier to read and has a Landmark edition too but you might not need it, and I think its translation is TOO readable and its giant size not worth it. A library card helps with this, to avoid wasting money.
Xenophon concludes Thucydides' account and his major works can be read pretty easily.
Plato is Plato. Lots of good books on him. For Aristotle, I'd recommend Rist's Mind of Aristotle, at least the introductory first two chapters, to get a plausible overview of Aristotle's thought that is concerned with historical plausibility and not written by some modern Aristotelian analytic philosopher with axes to grind.
If you can stomach it, Windelband's History of Ancient Greek Philosophy is still good for a traditional summation of the various philosophers, but it's hard. Most people probably wouldn't read this anymore, but it was helpful to me because it was thorough, and so many books are afraid to be thorough these days.
>got extremely drunk last night for the first time in about 5 years
>almost zero recollection this morning
>open my Packard Bell laptop
>notice Word document is open
>open it
>find a 33,000 essay basically articulating the reasons in favour of a major genocide in the near future
What the fuck happened here? Anybody else experience this sort of thing? Is this why Hemingway said write drunk and edit sober?
Faux and homo-sexualis
>>9948412
as a normie, you can safely delete what is written
>>9948412
post the essay or it didn't happen
Does reading make me loose eyesight? Does it matter if i read on a monitor or on paper? Depends how big are the characters?
>>9948293
Sight without Glasses by W.H. Bates. Worked for Huxley
So the Black Sun just happened. Supposedly materialism is upon us now. Do anyone of you have any good info or old books about the black sun or old Astrology?
>>9948275
lol no
What is the Black Sun?
>>9948279
The Black Sun is a third planetary body knows by all ancient cultures from vikings to aztecs. (((Officially))) it is when the moon goes infront of the sun, but if you you nerd yourself into the topic youll find out its anything but.
How accurate is this image, /lit/?
>>9948203
I'm a fan of Nazism. I'm redpilled. Let's take back our white women. Praise Lord fucking Kek
>>9948203
Rommel hated the Nazis and wanted Hitler dead. This has to be in the back of anyone's mind when evaluating Rommel and all he did and didn't do in ww2. He remains an enigma, lucky in war, unlucky in assassination plots.
>>9948326
he was hardly even involved in any assassination plots
he knew about it, in so much as he was approached and turned them down and didn't say anything afterwards about it
What went wrong?
this guy was fucking avant-terrible. its hilarious. kis.
>>9947985
This dude came to my college and crashed at one of the areas party houses. I'm under the impression he does that a lot. He put on a pretty entertaining show. Props to him for doing it, I agree though, the cloud videos are absolute shit.
And I'm not sure he ever made anything all that great
>>9947985
I don't know who he is, but I still want to kick him in the teeth.