So I have a question:
Have any other anons ever felt pure anxiety before beginning a literary project?
I've written short stories, poems, one-act plays, even a memoir and never felt a single tinge of anxiousness before writing them.
I currently have an idea for a novel, which conveniently enough I get to execute for a college course, and for some reason whenever I think about it, I experience a sharp, piercing sense of anxiety in my gut. And it isn't because I'm afraid that it might not be good enough, or people might judge it too critically. I don't exactly know why it is. I do know that my conception of the story, structure, style, etc. is clearer than it ever has been. I feel like I'm onto something sincerely good.
So again I ask: has any other anon had this feeling? Of near-panic at the thought of writing—of midwifing a piece of fiction from mind to paper?
And if so, what might it mean?
>Anon reads a lot, I bet he's really smart!
>Just read genre fiction and parrot /lit/ opinions about complicated literature
>Anon, you've always got your head buried in a book, why can't you find a job? Just use your book smarts
>>9026486
>they're right you know
Most of the time and for most people, the manipulating of your image to convey a sense of knowledge through nice presentation and eloquence is the right way to go. It's all about presentation - how you appear to others. Even if you where well educated and versed, if you do not convey an according image no one will give a shit.
Educate yourself and stop whining fag.
Good luck
>why don't you apply at the library anon?
>>9027434
>Most of the time and for most people, the manipulating of your image to convey a sense of knowledge through nice presentation and eloquence is the right way to go. It's all about presentation - how you appear to others. Even if you where well educated and versed, if you do not convey an according image no one will give a shit.
Why should I give a shit whether they give a shit? The only people you really need to go out of your way to impress are your employers and people you're trying to get in bed with. Let everyone else think what they want.
Why is the murderer a sexy character? I'm reading a book about how murder mysteries and true crime became popular and it occurred to me to ask you. Why do you think the murderer, Ted Bundy or Jack the Ripper, is so easily eroticised?
Pic related is an attractive criminal but not a murder, just seemed relevant.
>>9026471
Plays by his own rules
Killing and sex are linked deeply in the human psyche, check out Grossman's Art of Killing for an in-depth exploration
>>9026471
because women like to be raped by big strong men. that simple.
Just bought the Iliad, what am I in for?
>>9026385
I don't know. Over in /swtg/ we are reading Mythology and A Brief History of Ancient Greece. I suggest you join us and read these works for historical context and a general frame of reference before jumping into the Iliad.
>>9026385
Drama. Lots of drama from mainly Achilles.
>>9026385
Its basically Capeshit tier. Don't expect anything special by modern standards
The first half is much more dense, but the feverish and impassioned pages-long monologues of the second half redeemed it for me.
Here is what I gleaned from it.
>Being overly conscious/cultivated is a sickness, leading to self loathing, anxiety and doubt.
>The man of heightened conscious is not a man of action. To act, one must be at ease and without doubt.
>Knowledge and civilisation does not improve man as a rule. It cultivates questionable tastes, including pleasure in blood, and humiliating others.
>Man is unreasonable by nature due to his free will, and will act capriciously against his own self interest and profit. Thereby, utopias are not viable.
>Women are a regenerating influence
>The protag is unhappy due to a lonely upbringing, pride, and being unfamiliar with good life. This is agitated by an elevated consciousness which is derived from books and urban life, and self-destructive behavior. This makes him turn his back on life, friendship, love, and opportunities.
Am I being facile, or did I miss something? Maybe you can say so. I Preferred Crime And Punishment but I enjoyed this and I can imagine rereading it in the future to get a better grasp on Dosto's intentions.
>>9026336
>Being overly conscious/cultivated is a sickness, leading to self loathing, anxiety and doubt.
I believe that he was fundamentally the same when he wrote his memoirs and when he was in school.
If you liked Notes from Underground then read his other short stories, especially White Nights and A Gentle Creature. They are very easy to read, and have more emotion from the romance angle than Notes from Underground has.
>>9026336
>Being overly conscious/cultivated is a sickness, leading to self loathing, anxiety and doubt.
Not necessarily. It's important to not the historical context of the novel and consider how society treats Zverkov and the narrator.
The narrator is undeniably a well-educated and smart man. Society, however, fully rejects the narrator who is forced to work a menial, miserable job and be entirely unhappy with his existence.
Zverkov, on the other hand, is a piece of shit, yet Zverkov is the type of person whom is lauded by Russian society at the time. Keep in mind the footnote at the beginning of the novel, where Dostoevsky indicated that this is a work of fiction, yet such men must exist, because these are the types of men that Russian society produces.
At the time Russia was still essentially operating under feudalism. Europe was moving towards democracies and republics, and their philosophy was influencing Russian society. So Russian society was extremely backwards compared to European society at the time, yet Russian citizens had access to revolutionary European philosophy. This is one of the many reasons that there are not many renowned Russian philosophers; Russian society stifled dissenting thought, but some authors (such as Dostoevsky) could get away with pseudo-philosophical novels.
>The man of heightened conscious is not a man of action. To act, one must be at ease and without doubt.
The man of action thing really boils down to the narrator's interaction with the officer that the narrator perceived as disrespecting him (note again, Russian society's dismissal of the narrator, and the narrator's awareness of this dismissal). The officer doesn't give two shits about the narrator, but the narrator becomes obsessed with earning some abstract respect.
When the narrator bumps the officer the narrator is elated, but only temporarily. This whole man of action thing is a result of the narrator's simultaneous inferiority/superiority complex.
I'm typing a lot and need to sleep. I love discussing this novel, so I'll check this thread tomorrow if there are responses. Have a good night, /lit/.
I love this book but it depresses the shit out of me. One of the most memorable parts for me is when he talks about how man is the master of ungratefulness. You can think everything you've ever wanted is X and once you achieve/get it you'll quickly lose interest and become depressed again.
Which should I read before bed /lit/?
>>9026311
Calvin and Hobbes.
calvin & hobbes
>>9026311
That's the smallest fucking picture ever posted. Read the manual for your potato phone.
Do any of you read philosophy/psychoanalyz books to try to find a way to escape your own pathetic life?
It's hard to admit, but I do. I try to read book after book about philosophy or psychoanalyzes with the hopes that I will somehow understand enough to fix my pathetic state of being. Yet after having read a lot of books, I'm in the same state of mind, or I might even say in a worse one.
>>9026137
>Do any of you read philosophy/psychoanalyz books to try to find a way to escape your own pathetic life
>Escape
What have you exactly read Anon?
>>9026137
This character you're portraying sucks.
>>9026168
With "escape" I didn't mean escapism but rather finally lead a happy, or rather not so shitty, life.
I have read a lot of the Greeks, but after realizing that reading philosophy hasn't actually offered me anything positive in my life (what I was seeking) I took a break from philosophy and got heavily invested into psychoanalysis. I have read interpretation of dreams, ego and the Id, introduction to psychoanalyzis, on murder and melancholia, I read some Jung and some books by some unknown authors only to realize that the more books I read the more I realize that nothing helps.
>>9026199
I am a worthless neet, I tried working for years but it didn't help so I just went back to being a neet on welfare.
Is this the best fucking thing ever or the worst fucking thing ever? https://youtu.be/h-9L7Uv1Ei8
>>9026112
Neither, its just reddit tier
>>9026124
Not all peculiar things have to be Reddit tier, pal.
Different question:
Is it the smartest thing or the dumbest thing?
>read Gravity's Rainbow the first time
>didn't understand shit
>listen to the Gravity's Rainbow audiobook a couple months later
>everything starts to make more sense
The audiobook is pretty good, lads, I'd reccomend it.
>>9026053
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PTZOuKx09k
I dont know if that is or can be true man, maybe if you at least also had the writing open in front of you, you could always pause, and rewind and listen to a paragraph or sentence multiple times I spose
>>9026053
This probably means you have better auditory working memory. Try repeating this again with another book.
>>9026053
I'm listening to Gravity's Rainbow audiobook right now and although some sections/themes are confusing, I think I am doing a fairly good job of keeping track of the important things in my headand I just check summary sites to make sure I'm not completely mixed up sometimes.
Donald Trump and Thomas Pinecone attend all the same events. They have met multiple times. Trump's favorite Pynchon book is Mason & Dixon.
>>9026008
>Trump
>Literate
This gives me a far less favorable view of Pynchon then. I wouldn't expect him to be friendly with an authoritarian.
Have you ever seen Donald Trump and Thomas Pynchon together at the same time? Neither have I. What could it mean?
What's the most coherent and defensible meta-ethical position?
>>9025976
If you need to ask
non-cognitivism
non-naturalistic moral realism
>book is set in the author's home town
>main character is an author
>book takes place in my anus
>>9025697
>main character has daddy issues
Who's this?
I don't know, but I recognize the photo.
It was taken by a friend of mine, known affectionately as "nigga who about to get cut."
Some Guy.
>>9025713
It's spelled Sum Gai
What's /lit/'s opinion of The Art of the Deal?
>>9025651
What are yours?
Kino
>>9025659
I haven't read it but I see it as interesting insight on the man behind the flair. I don't have the money for it until tomorrow but I plan on ordering it soon
Was there any writer before or after him (until the 19th century at least) that pondered life, death, and meaning as deeply as he did in Hamlet?
>>9025638
Who?
>>9025629
I remember when i first moved to united states for university, we had to read hamlet in one of the english classes. I was very happy as i had never read shakespeare before. Then, i read it, and i kept thinking is this it?
This is the guy that only anglos have the audacitynto compare to cervantes/goethe/dante?
>>9026277
de gustibus non est disputandum