>tfw my crippling anxiety is coming back
What are some books that will help me with this?
The Young Girl's Handbook of Good Manners for Use in Educational Establishments by Pierre Louys
my cock by mike hawk
>>9168150
Mein Tagebuch by Toby Honayst helped me immensely
I LOVE BOOKS
OHAYOU /LIT/, LET'S DO OUR BEST AND READ AS MANY PAGES AS POSSIBLE TODAY
>>9168049
I WILL DO MY BEST
>>9168063
l-let's... n-n-not..
>write something
>read it later
>cringe so hard i have to delete it all
>>9167960
>write something
>read it later
>cringe so hard I have to burn my house down and move to another state
>write something you hate at the time
>read it later
>hey, this is actually pretty good
> write something
> read it again
> shit, this is pretty good
> wait a month
> read it again
> fuck this is good
> submit it to Omni Reboot
> "we'd like to pay you $450, here's a PDF contract"
> fill out form, return it
> wait a month
> nothing happens
> politely email them
> "we aren't accepting submissions at this time"
CUNTS.
i should have stuck to my guns and insisted "you already sent me a contract, you feeble drobe", but the website has been dead ever since. poor interns are probably sucking cock for cappuccinos.
What are some good essays on the concept of "genius"?
It seems what a genius is has shifted from an achievement of almost miraculous level, to genius being someone in a constant state of being.
I feel Hollywood movies like pic related are dishonest about such a concept. The character in the movie ia more like a Renaissance man, large amount of knowledge in a lot of scientific, political and artistic fields, than someone of genius.
Right, that's called 'knowledge'.
I wholeheartedly believe that anyone has the potential to become an innovator, you just have to put the effort into understanding the world rationally, and well.
This site, reddit, lesswrong. They all help, because you can DISCUSS concepts on here. You can help yourself progress through life with others and push yourself upward through progressive understanding.
>>9167901
This movie and Finding Forrester, are cringefests of maximum proportion, both by Gus The Hack.
I hate cheap expositional fragments like the kid in Finding Forrester lecturing some guy about the history of BMWs or Will Hunting telling Robin Williams's character his painting is shit by spouting artistic techniques he butchers.
Normies are like wow that guy knows stuff, i now believe he is a genius!!
>>9167909
>I wholeheartedly believe that anyone has the potential to be cool
>you just have to put the effort into understanding the world rationally
>rationally
>or else ur not cool
>allows for actual discussion
>says he, being a rational thinker all throughout
Does reading this book make you realize almost every economist other than Adam Smith is unironically retarded?
"Realize" implies uncovering a hidden truth. So no.
>>9167905
Are you implying that Adam Smith is ironically retarded or not retarded at all? There are a couple more possibilities but these two are the most basic.
>>9167899
No but it's worth reading. George and Smith have a very similar view towards absentee landlords and rentiers but George ends up becoming too libertarian about other non land based rents and the means to combat exploitation.
"But in their blind quest for uniformity, they will never eradicate conflict. Globalism will only replace wars between nations with wars within former nations. It takes battles that formerly took place on borders and spreads them from street to street. It’s possible that rather than global harmony, endless and irrevocable conflict is globalism’s true end game.
Whether by accident or design, a sick irony about globalism is that it often poses as a humane antidote and a form of ongoing karmic retribution for European colonialism. As the argument goes, the fact that France unfairly colonized parts of Northern Africa means that the righteous thing is for Northern Africans to culturally and demographically colonize France. Apparently these dreamers’ parents never taught them that two wrongs don’t make a right and will likely lead to more conflict and bloodshed."
- Jim Goad
Any other writers with the dark wit of Jim Goad?
>>9167833
>Jim Goad
If only his name was Don T. Goad-Meintoreadingthisassiniedrivel
we must secure the existence for our white children, fuck those french cucks
>>9167879
no, we must love those in need and help them through our good actions.
your racism is a prison that you have constructed yourself out of lies and hatred. destroy it as you would a bird's nest.
>>9167906
Why would you destroy a bird's nest you dumb cuck?
What's the deal with Harlan Ellison?
>>9167784
damn I thought he was black. guess I'll buy one of his books
he's kind of a prick in interviews. he did write a pretty banging short story, though, so maybe that excuses it.
>>9167799
i always thought he was black too, desu. i think harlan sounds like harlem and ralph ellison is a famous black author, so its a subconscious kind of thing.
>>9167784
Download Uncle Harley's books. It infuriates him.
Is it a bad idea to listen to music while reading? If not, what music is good for reading?
depends on the genre. Like orchestral for action/ fantasy, piano and violin for classics.
I guess it sorts of works if it's low volume.
>>9167774
I listen to music when I write, because I write in short bursts, I'll sit and think for 5 minutes and write for 30 seconds. When I'm reading it is at a fairly constant speed, and music just distracts me.
Every day until you read it.
Are you reading Gravity’s Rainbow? Have you started and then stopped out of frustration, confusion, laziness? Have questions about the plot, themes, context, references? Want input on interpreting a specific\section of text? Think the book is a big bullshit meme? Think Pynchon is for hipsters? Haven’t ever touched the book but are curious?
Well, then this is the thread for you! I will field any questions you have and share with you all that I know about this fascinating, beautiful, and terrifying work.
I haven’t read GR in a couple of years, but I’m about to start another read through. I’ve read the first 200-200 pages many more times than I’ve read the last 400 or so. There are probably about 40 pages of really, really difficult material, some of which I still can’t parse, but I’ll give you my impression of whatever. The best thing you can do is to jump in and feel like you’re drowning. I first peeked at the book when I was 17/18 and didn’t finish it till I was 25/26. Also, make sure GR is your first Pynchon novel; don’t try and “ease into it” with 49 or Vineland.
I will accept nothing but the total conversion of the browsing population.
To the guy in the last thread who had a question about a tarot passage involving the King of Cups, I was thinking about a totally different passage more in the center of the book.
If you post the page numb though I'll read it and give you my impression.
>>9167723
>Think the book is a big bullshit meme? Think Pynchon is for hipsters?
But both of these assertions are true and self-feeding. Few if any people still read it for any literary value it might have but rather as a bragging by a group of people who revel in the "undergroundness" while clearly only having parse it and read the wiki site. Why make a thread to encourage these insufferable cunts to ask questions so they can fake having read the book and act smugly superior to everyone else?
Is British candy really as bad as Slothrop made it seem? Also the chapter about Blicero and katje and the oven thing seemed to last forever.
Give me Satanic books.
>>9167687
That there Satanic Book, OP, is also a great book. Maybe Huysmann's best-- the astrologer in the tower, the interpolated history of G d'R, the kooky Madame de C-- HUGELY underrated.
Can we have a stupid questions thread on /lit/?
Could some Latin scholar clarify something with me?
With a word like "concessum", how do I know when to use that as opposed to the other
"concessus", "concessa"?
>>9167560
Not helping with your homework kiddo.
any books that defend narcissism? or that will convince me to do immoral things for money?
Is it even worth asking where to start with Aquinas? Is it even as if I would understand him?
Read the Small Summa.
Then read the De Malo.
Then read the big Summa.
Finally when you're so holy you levitate, tackle the Summa Contra Gentiles.
Start with Aquinas by ignoring the tubby bitch completely.
> "The Sacred Hog of St Hubert's"
> so fat when he died they had to pull down a wall of his house to get the body out
>>9167516
Was he really that fat? Lmao
Why doesn't the church ever bring that part up?
Is psychoanalysis practical philosophy? what's the difference between using other philosophies to change your life and psychoanalysis?
>>9167139
No.
Marketing is practical philosophy.
>>9167268
fuck. That's depressing
>>9167139
Psychoanalysis is not philosophy (unless you subscribe to esoteric lacanian values). It's more like a talking cure. the resolution which the analyst draws out of your words aren't necessarily statements of fact or poignant philosophisations, their only use is to encourage you to rethink your current position and direct you towards making positive changes to your life. Always remember the signifier is arbitrary, you aren't going to make a startling philosophical revelation through psychoanalysis. That's not its endgame.
name philosophers than are or have been interested in chance, randomness.
>>9167079
Don't you mean mathematicians? Any attempt to properly investigate randomness is a mathematical effort, and anyone who pretends otherwise is wrong.
TALEB
>>9167100
you might be right, but i'm a humanities fag, so i need philosophers, i need good texts on the subject.
I think some old /lit/ fucker must have just died.
Nice old RCFs.
>always the same shit
why are you Americans so monotonous, so limited?
>>9167048
here's your (you)